And you're right, I was hoping Walsh would have retorted "A woman who can't bear children still has her reproductive organs; she's still categorically a biological female even if she can't produce children."
I presume the heat of the moment gave him a bit of brain fog, but the point extends to a fact he already put forward about the biological differences between men and women. Just because some of those properties that define the sex no longer work (i.e., a man who shoots blanks) doesn't mean they're no longer categorically that sex.
I mean, put your self in his shooes. Imagine having to talk to that thing to explain to it why it's an idiot. In the business, we call that an Automatic Brain Fog Generator.
Well said.
And you're right, I was hoping Walsh would have retorted "A woman who can't bear children still has her reproductive organs; she's still categorically a biological female even if she can't produce children."
I presume the heat of the moment gave him a bit of brain fog, but the point extends to a fact he already put forward about the biological differences between men and women. Just because some of those properties that define the sex no longer work (i.e., a man who shoots blanks) doesn't mean they're no longer categorically that sex.
I mean, put your self in his shooes. Imagine having to talk to that thing to explain to it why it's an idiot. In the business, we call that an Automatic Brain Fog Generator.