Was thinking about this earlier. There is no actual transitive properties to being transsexual or transgender. By all scientific standards a “trans” person is accurately described as pseudosexual, or an imitation of another sex. It is abundantly clear that “trans” has no complete transition, it is an imitation, and in most cases a mockery. A transient state requires a completed transition, this is of course impossible for “trans” people because they can’t remake their dna or grow ovaries/ testes. Pseudo is the only apt description for someone who believes they are a different biological makeup and attempts an imitation of that makeup.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
Ok good luck with that, see you in jail after Bill C-36 passes
I expect some of our users will be saying this after more authoritarian laws around the world successfully pass.
Oh well, let's do our best until then! :D
I'll save you a seat by the swingsets.
Also, I'm going to petition that jails get swingsets. It's transphobic not to, after all.
What you've posted makes perfect sense in objective reality. Sadly the lgbtqwtfbbq live in a delusion that states trans women are women, and trans men are men. This delusion is the accepted and approved reality according to our betters.
I've seen LGBTBBQ and LGBTWTF used separately but something about the two of them combined make me spit my drink.
There's an anon here using it for his/her/schkgler username
I read pseudo as pedo at first. It must be the universe trying tell me something.
Ah! I'm not the only one then!
Yes it is a bastardization of transvestite which is just about changing clothes.
Always the fucking Germans. :P
Kinda but not really, it's just a bastardization of the cis-/trans- nomenclature from Latin. Trans(across/opposite)-vestite(clothing wearer) means wearing clothes from the opposite sex, likewise trans-gender means being the opposite gender from your sex whilst cis(same side)-gender means being the same gender as your biological sex.
Except most of them have dropped the pretense of sex/gender being separate terms now they've successfully wedged out any objections to their delusions based on observable biology, and are now just pretending that they actually are the opposite sex.
OP is slightly confused in that nothing about the "trans" part is supposed to be short for transient. But they're quite right that "pseudo-woman" would actually be less of an etymological mess of a term than "trans-woman" is and help sidestep the motte and bailey'ing that goes on with the constantly shifting sex/gender definitions.
No I think that's a reverse rationalization and they started calling themselves transgendered (don't forget transsexual) because they didn't like transvestites. Then they created an etymological foundation for their new terminology. You're right about the sex/gender delineation. I hadn't noticed it but you hardly hear the "SEX AND GENDER ARE DIFFERENT!" propaganda any more.
Transvestite is the oldest term; first coined over a century ago and, given the massive overlap in communities, likely the cause of the inception of the other trans- terms. Transient clothing wearer would mean they're "occasional dressers", not "cross dressers".
It just doesn't make sense for the cis-/trans- roots to be a post-hoc rationalization when the original transvestite term doesn't make sense the other way. It just got bastardized into transgender and trans-man/woman as part of their weird semantic degeneration games.
Ok I think we're saying the same thing. I don't supporting the "transient" interpretation either.
True that! It makes a lot of sense that way.
Transvestite: someone dressing up as the other sex.
Transsexual: someone having surgery to look like the other sex.
I prefer transsexual to transgender, because the concept of 'gender identity' is an invention of the pro-pedophilia, child-abusing Dr. John Money.
I have posted on this before on here, but I think it is worth repeating: If you actually delve into their own content such as their own lgbta wiki... and see what they actually have there it becomes quite clear gender is almost a meaningless term. Gender is basically a personality trait/quirk/obsession to them in most cases. I mean by their definition it makes sense. For example on the comments on that wiki someone asks the question: "Ok so sex is like the parts you have and gender is how you feel" and someone responds with yes. So gender literally is personality trait/quirk/or obsession to them.
Seriously check out this:
https://lgbta.wikia.org/wiki/Category:Gender
and scroll down to the alphabetized list. It is INSANE. Hundreds of genders, and legit every single one has a flag almost.
ADHD Gender, OSGender [you identify as windows linux or mac OS], Floatgender, Ditzygender [basically you are ditzy or aloof it says], dragongender and more.
Here is a fun one I just found: Ph4ntomzgender. From their wiki:
"Ph4ntomzgender, or phantomzgender, is a non-binary and agender, yet masc-aligned gender. It feels masculine in the way a feminine blue is masculine. It often changes like a "stringy glob monster," and can sometimes melt into another gender. It feels like a demonic eldritch beast, but can also sometimes feel human" --- That one is more normal sounding than most of them...
Or "Starcollector": From their wiki:
"Starcollector is when somebody collects genders related to stars and other space related things. Examples of genders one might collect are Stargender, Spacecoric, or Caelgender. Those were just examples, as people can collect as many as they want. These can either be fluid, or static "
Wtf does it mean to even collect a gender?!
Fina example "Puddlegender":
"Puddlegender is a xenogender that is described through puddles. It can be combined with other gender(s) or used alone and by anyone. Sometimes it's cloudy, muddy, obscure, and sometimes it's clear as day. It can be a big or small puddle and it can have any components in it. Leaves, ice, etc., and of course, water. There can be ripples if so much as a drop is added, or it can be still and calm. Sometimes it grows, sometimes it shrinks, sometimes it stays for days and sometimes it's completely evaporated. But it's still there, waiting to form a puddle again. "
They even have different gender "alignment systems" for categories of gender paradigms such as crystal alignment system, galactic alignment system, color alignment [including things like Paintgender for multiple genders in that system]. Or then they have general terms like Octogender for if you are someone with exactly 8 genders.
My point is, at this point gender even to them is a virtual meaningless term. They are one step away from accepting that by their definition literally just means your specific personality meaning everyone just has their own gender known as themselves.
My IQ dropped 5 points whilst reading that.
I like it! It is both a better technical description and a denial of the premise that people can change sex by wishing.
Of course the real designations of faggot, degenerate, or freak are the most appropriate but we aren't always amongst friends and need to sometimes remain optical.
I am actually concerned that regressive leftists could try to get us vanned if they see our ip addresses.
Fleeing to eastern Europe will be a bitch.
You need better things to worry about.
Personally I like to say Trans-Identifying, TIM wishes he was a girl and TIF wishes she was a boy.
Ersatz-sexual? 🤔
As long as you say the magic words, males can become females and vice-versa.
If the "right" had any sense of strategy or pragmatic unity this would take off. It has a pretty good chance of being a decent linguistic killshot.
They are abominationsexuals.
pseudogynism? Both greek words.
You do realize all of this is being promoted by Pseudo Intellectuals?
I mean, that's why the "sane" trans people call themselves trans-man or trans-woman. The problem is, the sane people who do this (yes, we know they're technically mentally stunted because of their ailment, but let's at least give these people the benefit of the doubt) are outnumbered by the firebreathing retard activists from Twitter/Tumblr/colleges.
Obviously the one you all heard of the most is Blaire White. She doesn't call herself a woman, she calls herself a trans-woman, and she's done videos before where she said specifically "I know I'll never be biologically a man, the best I can do is try to look as close to a woman as possible". or something to that aspect, and that's why she specifically uses the trans-woman label.
Pseudo would work as well. Trans types who go this route are a bit more tolerable to deal with because at least they admit they won't EVER be a "real" man or woman, but if that shit lets them live their life and they don't preach that retarded ideology I can tolerate their presence.
Emphasis on tolerate. It should not be promoted.
Ah, yes. The traditional "a vanishingly small number of exceptions with unique circumstances disproves the rule, bigot" non-argument. A classic.
Though, the
really tells you as much as you need to know, right from the get-go.
5% or it doesn't exist as an object of concern. I like science. Science demands 95% accuracy from the hundreds of peer-reviewed studies I've read. Outliers are ignored in most peer-reviewed studies.
This is a blantant lie, you are talking about swyer syndrome. 1. they are undeveloped xy treated with female hormones because they never grew gonadal genitalia. 2. they are intersex, are ALWAYS INFERTILE, and never grow or develop eggs. 3. The only reason Swyer "women" can have children is through a donor egg, so once again, no xy genes making eggs. This has nothing to do with trans its a misnomer argument with false claims like what you made. Intersex people are a known born deficiency that is adapted to the easiest gender because it makes their life more normal.
You once again are defeating your own point, you are arguing that because we can transplant viable female organs into another body. That organ is never "theirs", their body will reject it without medication and lifelong medical intervention, just like any organ transplanted from one person to another. All you just said is we are getting better at playing Frankenstein, which once again point to pseudo over trans.
Did you even bother to read the materials you linked?
unassisted pregnancy is unheard of, but no reports of fertility in a 46,XY woman
The study literally says this is freak mutations over generations and is entirely hereditary. Once again, they had to Frankenstein the pregnancy.
who had a successful pregnancy through in-vitro fertilization by oocyte donation.
Once again, in both cases, they were pumped up with numerous female hormones to make their body simulate pregnancy because they couldn't do it naturally. This was again with a donor egg, so not even the Swyer trannies genes.
Person cant give birth naturally, is pumped full of hormones like a factory farm chicken and has such mutated DNA that its XY karyotype is not strictly XY, but XY, X, and XX.
93% 46,XY, 6% 45,X, and <1% 46,XX in the ovary
In other words this person is an amalgamation of Swyer Syndrome, Turner Syndrome, and normal female. Guess which part made the egg? Like I said, hereditary abnormality where the 7% won the roulette wheel, which also means that the egg did not grow from the XY karyotype.
Like I said, this person is an amalgamation of Swyer, Turner, and Normative XX.
I am correct, Swyer syndrome is always infertile, this person was a XY Predominant. An amalgamation where the 45X and the 46XX in the person allowed for fertility. I know this is difficult for someone not versed in karyotypes, but you're trying to argue something the study states is explicitly not the case. The fact of the matter is the small amount of 45X and 46XX created the fertility, none of the 46XY did. You are clearly confused or grasping at straws, the study itself states clearly that the subject is Not XY but XY predominant. If my right eye is blue and my left eye is blue/grey/brown then my eye color is not blue.
Again a lie, no doctor would ever state that. An infertile woman can carry another woman's egg and birth it. They did not create an egg, they are merely an incubator.
you are the only one shifting goalposts, you claimed XY women can have kids, this is a lie. You claimed the XY predominant woman is XY, this is again a lie. You are now claiming I'm shifting goalposts because according to you alone someone who has multiple sex karyotypes is somehow only XY. Let me put this very simply for you (46XY) does not equal (46XY, 45X, and 46XX).
How many are there?
its a lie, hes making the claim that Swyer syndrome is "female". They are basically men who never develop gonads, are always sterile and require hormonal treatment during puberty just like every other tranny.
How you contort yourself to try to defend the indefensible is quite funny.
You either have a Y or you don't, end of story (except for chimeras but I think only 10 chimeras have been identified. There's no one with a Y chromosome who can give birth, full stop (and again in theory a chimera with part of their body made up of XY could give birth if their reproductive system was XX (or XXX or XXXX or anything without a Y really, but again 10 have been identified).
Chimera? Over 50 have been proven to have multiple DNA, but its suspected there's a lot more out there since the test for it is not applied often.
There's claims that full-on hermaphrodites (both sex organs fully in place) have sired children and given birth, but IDK how believable that is.
Where does that number come from? If you run down the "100 cases" number on wikipedia the original source is an off-hand comment by a random scientist with no source.
Because there's FUCKING 10 of them. Literally 1 in a billion, and it's not an XY human that can give birth it's literally two siblings mashed together. If the brain is XY and the gonads are XX that's really fucking neato, but it's still an XX reproductive system; it's a man walking around with his sister's reproductive system. You will never meet one. I will never meet one.
Not really. Seems to me that you're upholding delusion against reality.
Good. Neither will I.
Trans 'women' are a subset of men, yes. Their delusion is no reason to distinguish them.
Nah. There's no such thing as 'transition'. That is an impossibility. If a group of people decided to 'transition' to being a whale, that would not change their ontological status. Nor these loons.
Then that is to be dealt with. But you don't deal with it by surrendering. Once you buy into their nonsense, you have already lost. Once you pretend that delusional men are women, you have removed the very ground on which you can stop any of the other things.
It is the only position that has a chance of winning. Saying A through Y and then trying to hold the line at Z is an impossibility.
And which was then promptly debunked, to which you were unable to formulate an objection.
What a joke. It seems you have a great lack of the human condition if you think that grafting a womb on a man will make that a woman.
And that's why it is called an analogy. 'Transitioning' is not a thing. You cannot transition from one gender to another. You can only be a sad knock-off attempting to wear another gender as a costume.
I agree. That is because they buy into the presumptions of the tranny nonsense, at which point it becomes impossible to resist it. I've seen some say that they will 'misgender' trannies. How stupid are these people? No, you correctly gender them.
It's never been a thing, nor will it ever be, because it's an impossibility. You can say that some people have the delusion that they are another gender and the delusion that they transitioned from one to the other, and that I would agree with.
And my position was closer to yours before I did my research. How ironic. As for kids, it will be pushed on them if we adopt your position, that this is OK and legitimate. In that case, why not push it on kids? You cannot resist it.
They're not women. So they don't belong in bathrooms intended for women. It's simple common sense.
hahahhahaha, call me when it stops being necessary to dilate for life if you don't want your """""""""vagina"""""""""" closing up