Was thinking about this earlier. There is no actual transitive properties to being transsexual or transgender. By all scientific standards a “trans” person is accurately described as pseudosexual, or an imitation of another sex. It is abundantly clear that “trans” has no complete transition, it is an imitation, and in most cases a mockery. A transient state requires a completed transition, this is of course impossible for “trans” people because they can’t remake their dna or grow ovaries/ testes. Pseudo is the only apt description for someone who believes they are a different biological makeup and attempts an imitation of that makeup.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
Ah, yes. The traditional "a vanishingly small number of exceptions with unique circumstances disproves the rule, bigot" non-argument. A classic.
Though, the
really tells you as much as you need to know, right from the get-go.
5% or it doesn't exist as an object of concern. I like science. Science demands 95% accuracy from the hundreds of peer-reviewed studies I've read. Outliers are ignored in most peer-reviewed studies.