Was thinking about this earlier. There is no actual transitive properties to being transsexual or transgender. By all scientific standards a “trans” person is accurately described as pseudosexual, or an imitation of another sex. It is abundantly clear that “trans” has no complete transition, it is an imitation, and in most cases a mockery. A transient state requires a completed transition, this is of course impossible for “trans” people because they can’t remake their dna or grow ovaries/ testes. Pseudo is the only apt description for someone who believes they are a different biological makeup and attempts an imitation of that makeup.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
Ah, yes. The traditional "a vanishingly small number of exceptions with unique circumstances disproves the rule, bigot" non-argument. A classic.
Though, the
really tells you as much as you need to know, right from the get-go.
5% or it doesn't exist as an object of concern. I like science. Science demands 95% accuracy from the hundreds of peer-reviewed studies I've read. Outliers are ignored in most peer-reviewed studies.
This is a blantant lie, you are talking about swyer syndrome. 1. they are undeveloped xy treated with female hormones because they never grew gonadal genitalia. 2. they are intersex, are ALWAYS INFERTILE, and never grow or develop eggs. 3. The only reason Swyer "women" can have children is through a donor egg, so once again, no xy genes making eggs. This has nothing to do with trans its a misnomer argument with false claims like what you made. Intersex people are a known born deficiency that is adapted to the easiest gender because it makes their life more normal.
You once again are defeating your own point, you are arguing that because we can transplant viable female organs into another body. That organ is never "theirs", their body will reject it without medication and lifelong medical intervention, just like any organ transplanted from one person to another. All you just said is we are getting better at playing Frankenstein, which once again point to pseudo over trans.
Did you even bother to read the materials you linked?
unassisted pregnancy is unheard of, but no reports of fertility in a 46,XY woman
The study literally says this is freak mutations over generations and is entirely hereditary. Once again, they had to Frankenstein the pregnancy.
who had a successful pregnancy through in-vitro fertilization by oocyte donation.
Once again, in both cases, they were pumped up with numerous female hormones to make their body simulate pregnancy because they couldn't do it naturally. This was again with a donor egg, so not even the Swyer trannies genes.
How many are there?
its a lie, hes making the claim that Swyer syndrome is "female". They are basically men who never develop gonads, are always sterile and require hormonal treatment during puberty just like every other tranny.
How you contort yourself to try to defend the indefensible is quite funny.
Trans 'women' are a subset of men, yes. Their delusion is no reason to distinguish them.
Nah. There's no such thing as 'transition'. That is an impossibility. If a group of people decided to 'transition' to being a whale, that would not change their ontological status. Nor these loons.
Then that is to be dealt with. But you don't deal with it by surrendering. Once you buy into their nonsense, you have already lost. Once you pretend that delusional men are women, you have removed the very ground on which you can stop any of the other things.
It is the only position that has a chance of winning. Saying A through Y and then trying to hold the line at Z is an impossibility.