Was thinking about this earlier. There is no actual transitive properties to being transsexual or transgender. By all scientific standards a “trans” person is accurately described as pseudosexual, or an imitation of another sex. It is abundantly clear that “trans” has no complete transition, it is an imitation, and in most cases a mockery. A transient state requires a completed transition, this is of course impossible for “trans” people because they can’t remake their dna or grow ovaries/ testes. Pseudo is the only apt description for someone who believes they are a different biological makeup and attempts an imitation of that makeup.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
How you contort yourself to try to defend the indefensible is quite funny.
You either have a Y or you don't, end of story (except for chimeras but I think only 10 chimeras have been identified. There's no one with a Y chromosome who can give birth, full stop (and again in theory a chimera with part of their body made up of XY could give birth if their reproductive system was XX (or XXX or XXXX or anything without a Y really, but again 10 have been identified).
Chimera? Over 50 have been proven to have multiple DNA, but its suspected there's a lot more out there since the test for it is not applied often.
There's claims that full-on hermaphrodites (both sex organs fully in place) have sired children and given birth, but IDK how believable that is.
Where does that number come from? If you run down the "100 cases" number on wikipedia the original source is an off-hand comment by a random scientist with no source.
Because there's FUCKING 10 of them. Literally 1 in a billion, and it's not an XY human that can give birth it's literally two siblings mashed together. If the brain is XY and the gonads are XX that's really fucking neato, but it's still an XX reproductive system; it's a man walking around with his sister's reproductive system. You will never meet one. I will never meet one.
Not really. Seems to me that you're upholding delusion against reality.
Good. Neither will I.