Was thinking about this earlier. There is no actual transitive properties to being transsexual or transgender. By all scientific standards a “trans” person is accurately described as pseudosexual, or an imitation of another sex. It is abundantly clear that “trans” has no complete transition, it is an imitation, and in most cases a mockery. A transient state requires a completed transition, this is of course impossible for “trans” people because they can’t remake their dna or grow ovaries/ testes. Pseudo is the only apt description for someone who believes they are a different biological makeup and attempts an imitation of that makeup.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
Where does that number come from? If you run down the "100 cases" number on wikipedia the original source is an off-hand comment by a random scientist with no source.
From a lot of reading I did almost 20 years back. The 'certified' number they said was 54 world-wide.
It isn't something that gets diagnosed often, eh? So it could happen a lot more but we'd never know it. It's essentially a 'conjoined twin' situation, only the part(s) of the lost (non-identical) twin replaced some of your own part(s).
If these theoretically cases exist I would argue the vast majority would be less obvious cases (because someone with two sets of genitals is pretty likely to get tested) such as maybe a bit of bone marrow is from the twin.