Was thinking about this earlier. There is no actual transitive properties to being transsexual or transgender. By all scientific standards a “trans” person is accurately described as pseudosexual, or an imitation of another sex. It is abundantly clear that “trans” has no complete transition, it is an imitation, and in most cases a mockery. A transient state requires a completed transition, this is of course impossible for “trans” people because they can’t remake their dna or grow ovaries/ testes. Pseudo is the only apt description for someone who believes they are a different biological makeup and attempts an imitation of that makeup.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
Chimera? Over 50 have been proven to have multiple DNA, but its suspected there's a lot more out there since the test for it is not applied often.
There's claims that full-on hermaphrodites (both sex organs fully in place) have sired children and given birth, but IDK how believable that is.
Where does that number come from? If you run down the "100 cases" number on wikipedia the original source is an off-hand comment by a random scientist with no source.
From a lot of reading I did almost 20 years back. The 'certified' number they said was 54 world-wide.
It isn't something that gets diagnosed often, eh? So it could happen a lot more but we'd never know it. It's essentially a 'conjoined twin' situation, only the part(s) of the lost (non-identical) twin replaced some of your own part(s).
If these theoretically cases exist I would argue the vast majority would be less obvious cases (because someone with two sets of genitals is pretty likely to get tested) such as maybe a bit of bone marrow is from the twin.