Was thinking about this earlier. There is no actual transitive properties to being transsexual or transgender. By all scientific standards a “trans” person is accurately described as pseudosexual, or an imitation of another sex. It is abundantly clear that “trans” has no complete transition, it is an imitation, and in most cases a mockery. A transient state requires a completed transition, this is of course impossible for “trans” people because they can’t remake their dna or grow ovaries/ testes. Pseudo is the only apt description for someone who believes they are a different biological makeup and attempts an imitation of that makeup.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
I mean, that's why the "sane" trans people call themselves trans-man or trans-woman. The problem is, the sane people who do this (yes, we know they're technically mentally stunted because of their ailment, but let's at least give these people the benefit of the doubt) are outnumbered by the firebreathing retard activists from Twitter/Tumblr/colleges.
Obviously the one you all heard of the most is Blaire White. She doesn't call herself a woman, she calls herself a trans-woman, and she's done videos before where she said specifically "I know I'll never be biologically a man, the best I can do is try to look as close to a woman as possible". or something to that aspect, and that's why she specifically uses the trans-woman label.
Pseudo would work as well. Trans types who go this route are a bit more tolerable to deal with because at least they admit they won't EVER be a "real" man or woman, but if that shit lets them live their life and they don't preach that retarded ideology I can tolerate their presence.
Emphasis on tolerate. It should not be promoted.