If you google her, they've already taken away her teaching position. She will never receive a grant or get a paper published.
They might allow her to stay at the university if she's tenured, because they have an enormous endowment so they can afford it. But she is effectively cut off from the world of academia.
So much of this is shockingly wrong.
Nope. Everything I've said is correct. You're the one who's wrong. Let's keep score, shall we?
Sickle Cell Anemia is a disease not a natural resistance.
I didn't say "sickle cell anemia" I said "sickle cells" - do you understand the difference? Sickle cells is an adaptation that reduces the mortality from malaria. In a region where malaria is endemic, sickle cells are a huge advantage. A little anemia is a small price to pay. (source)
So, I'm right. They developed resistance to the disease. That's one point for me. Your reply fails, so that's negative 1 point for you.
Malaria has been the most deadly disease that Europeans have ever faced.
How is mortality to Europeans at all relevant to this conversation?? Holy shit! You're way off track. Here, let me help you. You claimed that malaria prevented blacks from developing technology. I compared malaria's effect on blacks to the black plague's effect on whites.
That is the comparison being made. How deadly is malaria to blacks (who have some protection due to the sickle cell trait) vs. how deadly is the black plague to whites.
Here are two things that are irrelevant: (1) how deadly is the black plague to blacks (2) how deadly is malaria to whites
Once again, -1 points to you for raising an irrelevant objection.
Wheat isn't just some random grass.
I didn't say that wheat was "just some random grass" - I said that wheat was created by our ancestors through selective breeding. And what our ancestors started with is no poorer than what Africans have available to them.
The score is now 2 to -3
Sub-Saharan Africa's waterways are absolute shit.
Given your performance in this thread so far (literally everything up to this point has been irrelevant), I'm reticent to believe you here, but I actually don't know much about the geology so, I'll throw you a bone and grant you one point. The score is 2 to -2
There wasn't any lions in England and France.
I literally mentioned the name of the gave IN FUCKING FRANCE where our ancestors drew lions that they saw with their own two eyes.
The people who lived in those caves and drew those lions were at approximately the same state of development as must africans today. So what's different between these two groups? The presence of lions is not the difference.
The ancestors of the europeans killed off or tamed the megafauna, then developed a great civilization that flew to the moon. The ancestors of the first australian aborigines also killed off their megafauna, but then failed to develop a great civilization. Meanwhile, the africans did absolutely nothing.
Another point for me, and another point taken away from you for raising a faulty objection. Final score, me: 3, you: -4
Pfft you obviously don’t understand modern art. See, the car represents the world, and the man represents the USA. This piece depicts the world consumed in conflagration while the USA pisses itself due to incompetent leadership, and stabs itself due to self-hate
The artist is a genius and I just bought the nft of this landmark work for a million rubles
Malaria kills off density
(a) they evolved natural resistance to malaria (sickle cells)
(b) malaria is less deadly than the diseases Europeans faced. The Renaissance happened after the black plague ravaged Europe.
high-yield cash crops are hard to grow
"high yield cash crops" don't just fall into your lap. They're created through artificial selection by farmers carefully and deliberately crossing lower-yield strains.
Other races did this. Wheat was created from, basically, grass. Rice too. And when you create a living thing through evolution, you by definition create it to prefer your own climate.
So other races put in the effort to create these crops, and now you're making an excuse for blacks - "dey wont gibs me no crops!"
All that said, the Bantu (arguably the most successful sub-saharan african race) actually did invent farming on their own, and that was instrumental to their success. As in most things, the difference between blacks and other races isn't one of kind (that is to say, it isn't that one had farming and the other did not) it's a difference of degree (other races just do it better).
they don't have many navigable waterways
Fair enough, but they still could have created civilizations along the waterways that they had. It's like if you have $100k and you waste it, and your excuse is, "well that other guy had a million" - that's true, but you still wasted what you had
humans can be hunted by actual god damned predators.
That's true everywhere that humans have ever lived. There used to be fucking lions in Europe. Why do you think so many kings have lions in their heraldry?
There are drawings of lions in the caves of Chauvet. Much later, the Greeks had lots of stories of lions because they still roamed asia minor.
...what most humans did, when they entered a new area, is hunt the mega-fauna too extinction. Europeans did it. Asians did it. Even the aboriginal australians did it 50k years ago!
So again, this isn't a very good excuse.
There are parallels to Liberia. US slaves who were freed were offered free tickets back to Africa, to a country specifically created for them. Some of them took the offer, moved to Liberia, and set themselves up as the aristocracy, with native Africans as serfs - basically slaves.
The thing you have to understand is that the objection to slavery as a concept, meaning the idea that “no person should be a slave” is an abstract concept- and frankly, that’s the domain of white people.
What everyone else thinks is, *I* don’t want to be a slave, but it’s okay for me to keep slaves.
Once these people have power, they absolutely will oppress you.
Black rock has 10 trillion. Vanguard has 7 trillion. It boggles the mind.
The people who actually run the show have power that dwarfs even that - power to control kings, presidents, etc - power obtained through the activities of operatives like Epstein.
Head over to reddit and you'll see that they have an unlimited capacity for self-delusion.
From your perspective - already unplugged - you see each move as more and more crazy. But from the perspective of a leftist redditor, they justify each move to themselves, become comfortable with it, and then when the next crazy thing happens they say, "well that's not too crazy" and they justify that too.
It's going to be worse than you can imagine. It's going to be like south africa which somehow manages to be worse than just "collapse" - because the government still exists, and punishes white people who defend themselves.
If someone tries to kill you, and you kill them back ...and you're white... the police take you to jail where you're raped to death. We already see the beginnings of this with situations like Rittenhouse.
Check out this news story - a man and his wife are driving along and someone tries to carjack them. So the man drives to a police station. The criminals follow them. The man and his wife run inside the police station. The criminals follow them. The man is assaulted and robbed INSIDE THE POLICE STATION and the cops do nothing.
Eventually, inevitably, our governments will go the way of places like Chicago - every executive will be a low-IQ black, every judge, every cop. They will be incompetent, but also they will overtly hate you. You'll be victimized out on the street, and the government will say you deserve it because you're white. If you fight back, they will torture you to death in their prisons.
The elites will be insulated from this and (just like in South Africa) will continue to pander and say that white people are privileged.
always set deadmans switch
I don't mean to insult you when I say this - I honestly mean to help you, because naively thinking you've protected yourself is more dangerous than knowing you're vulnerable: you do not have the technical competence to set up a deadman's switch
I encourage you to "war game" it out by posting your plans here (not asking you to post passwords but just a general plan) and let other people poke holes in it.
Ultimately, the final vulnerability is going to be that the alphabets beat you with a wrench until you tell them how to deactivate your switch. That's just one reason why it's so difficult to set one up.
A filter isn't a measurement.
A filter is a measurement.
The photon will remain as probability until observed by a conscious mind.
The photon is blocked or passes through regardless of the presence of a conscious mind. The video you got this from, with the creepy animated guy, lied to you. Also, "What the *bleep* do we know" lied to you.
There isn't evidence.
There is evidence.
Scientists affirm many worlds because they are against the idea of consciousness solidifying reality.
And you reject many worlds because you like the idea of consciousness solidifying reality. What you need to do is propose an experiment that has a different result if a consciousness is involved than if no consciousness is involved.
how would it be possible to check all possibilities at once
It's a cool fact about the universe that will blow your mind: in some ways, the universe doesn't appear to be "computational" - meaning, it doesn't act like a computer.
One interpretation for the things we see at the quantum level is the Many Worlds interpretation. This is the idea that there are literally an infinite number of alternate universes, with infinitely more of them being created from moment to moment.
Got a pair of sunglasses? Okay, the lenses are polarized. When a photon reflects off a surface, the photon becomes polarized, and when that photon encounters a polarized lens, there's a chance it will be blocked by the lens, and a chance it will go through. This is why your sunglasses reduce the glare of light reflected off the windshields of cars.
The Many Worlds hypothesis says that when the photon becomes polarized, it doesn't actually "decide" at that moment which way it's polarized. And it wont ever bother to decide unless someone measures it (like for example with a polarized filter). At the moment when it's measured, according to this theory, the entire universe splits in two, and there's a universe where the measurement went one way and a whole other universe where it went the other way. There are literally two different versions of you, the observer - one in the universe where the photon made it through, and one where it was blocked.
And this is an interpretation that scientists take seriously because there's real evidence for it. You can probably see how this could not possibly be computational - it wouldn't be possible to build a computer that actually simulated this. You can't build a computer that actually does all the universes.
I don't have a really good practical understanding of quantum computers. I know that they very carefully keep particles in the wave state (they don't measure the particles). They let the particles become entangled with other particles, and they measure those. And somehow, they are able to use this to get results in a single operation that, in a classical computer would require brute force (you'd have to check every possibility).
Yeah. As u/ajfofjakf pointed out, TERFs are radical feminists who helped to destroy the stable, functional society we once had, and now they're mad that they're ideology has turned on them.
But what really cracks me up is that TERFs are the only kind of leftists who regularly get banned from Reddit. A great examples is (was) /r/pinkpillfeminism/ - the "pink" pill is the idea that all men are bad, so women should never associate with them. There's a website that caches image posts from subreddit, you can get an idea of what kind of content was posted there: https://pholder.com/r/pinkpillfeminism/
So they hate men. And that was totally okay with Reddit. But then some of the men they hate claimed to actually be women and wanted to join them in hating men. The pink pillers said "no" and that's when Reddit banned them
It's just funny to me the way leftist logic works. You can point your finger at a person and say that you hate them, and if the person you hate "identifies" as a white male, that's fine. But if the person changes their identity you're no longer allowed to hate them.
How fucked is this country when the federal government is hunting conservatives while leftists are literally seizing city blocks, setting up checkpoints, "autonomous zones" and extorting businesses, burning and looting businesses, and terrorizing people
Well keep in mind, you're comparing what we have today to actual communism after the purges
The very first thing that every communist regime does is kill all the "useful idiots." All the intellectuals who supported communism? Off to the gulag. The early organizers who created and passed out communist propaganda? Off to the gulag. The "true believers" in the ideal of communism? For-fucking sure they go straight to the gulag.
Why? Because these people are willing and able to question the actual policies of the """communist""" government. And a communist government is really just a totalitarian government with a better origin story. Anyone who questions or may question them gets purged, and purged hard.
The people who survive in positions of political power aren't actually communists - they're sociopaths willing to crack skulls to support the totalitarian government. They're basically gangsters.
And then afterwards, when the dust settles, you might get a few children's books. Sure. That's fine. Whatever. That's like selling lemonade on a block controlled by the mafia. They don't give a shit.
You're comparing that with what we have today. What we have today is much closer to the Salem Witch Trials. These people are literally brainwashed, and the people in power support them.
I got banned in the thread about the latino man and woman who were pulled from their car by blacks and executed.
I was banned because I replied to a comment by a pussy SJW whining that /r/actualpublicfreakouts was racist. They actually believe that the subreddit is racist just because it allows such videos. The "not racist" position, I guess, is just looking the other way.
They infiltrate (force themselves) into all sorts of communities!
The admins tell the moderators, "accept this new person as a moderator or we'll shut you down." To be honest, I'm more upset that the original moderators didn't post a sticky notifying the community, and then go down with the ship. The original moderators loved their power too much, so they bent the knee when the admins threatened them.
When reddit first became censorious, they did it in a ham-fisted way. They would just shut subreddits down. The way they do it these days is much more subtle. They bring in SJW moderators (ironically, actual racists - but the Good Kind of Racists) and remove individual people. Eventually, they turn the subreddit woke just like every other subreddit.
shortly before Rome fell, gender and sexuality obsessions were on the rise.
Yes, the book Sexual Personae discusses that as well.
We may possibly be close enough to a kind of technological singularity to avoid total collapse this time, but we're definitely headed down a dark path.
Hey man, I'm still looking over the census and I just discovered a huge problem with your analysis:
Subtracting colored slave owners (261,918 (p. 10)),
The chart you're looking at says "non-slaveholding" and "slaveholding" but you need to look at the heading - the heading says "states"
You thought that 261,918 was the number of black slave owners. No. It's the number of free blacks in slaveholding states. I don't (yet, I'm still looking) see any information on how many of those 261,918 free blacks actually owned slaves.
It boggles my mind that people would look around and say, "well, I'm a Democrat, and my state is entirely controlled by Democrats, and when I say entirely I mean the fucking dog catcher is a committed Democrat and so is everyone on up to the governor ....and my state sucks! I think I'll move to a Republican state which is clean and safe and sane ...and then vote in some Democrats"
I just literally don't get it. Do you ever meet CA refuges and talk to them? Do you ask them if they have considered the possibility that their political beliefs will turn Idaho into the exact thing they left behind?
I'm confident that this is the plan of democrats, leftists, and globalists. But it may not work as well as they assume.
Check this out: https://www.theblaze.com/news/republican-flips-mayorship-mcallen-texas
tl;dr this county is 85% hispanic and they just elected a republican mayor. A lot of hispanics are pissed at the dems for the way they are constantly fellating blacks.
When everyone around you tells you you're brave and stunning and special you tend to get delusional.
I sometimes wonder what that's like. Not that I want to be delusional, but I just wonder what it would be like to live in a society that validates everything I do - just to experience it once. Like a vacation or something.
I'm an evil white male and I'm constantly told that I'm privileged, and that because I'm privileged, I need to be denied something or other - a job, an education, whatever. I just wonder what it would be like for someone to say, "oh wow! a white male! We're so glad to have you! We know you're going to improve this organization!"
And I wonder what it would be like to go to school and sit in a history class and be taught that every historical figure who looks like you is automatically good and virtuous. And beyond history class, to have race brought up in every other class - always in a way that validates me.
This is so sad. I literally feel bad for you
No, I didn’t. I said that Europeans had faced worse diseases than Africans. That is a comparison between how malaria affects Africans (not Europeans) and how the Black Plague affects Europeans
We really can’t continue this conversation until you successfully parse that sentence