This is just a stepping stone - white women have been targets of anti-white persecution for a while now. Sure it's not as prevalent as with men, but it's very clearly the next step.
Until someone comes up with a “final solution” to the “white question”. No surprise that regressives’ obsession with Nazis stems from projection as usual.
The solution is to encourage interbreeding until there are only shades of brown. I remember being given propaganda in 7th grade showing that as the beautiful future of the world.
If we're going to go full human eugenics, we should find the people with the most green-tint and blue-tint in their skin tones and breed them selectively. Then we breed for pointed ears and longevity. Once they've genetically drifted enough that interbreeding causes infertile mules, propagandize the children to think they've been this way since the dawn of time, known for their superior arts and culture over hugh-manns. We gon make ourselves some elves.
How boring to just go "uniform light brown, that's humanity's future."
I’ve reached a point where I don’t even argue with people that get off on bashing white people. I simply ask them why they haven’t moved to a non majority white country. Particularly one with a brutal dictator.
Most people are generally aware Amazon has gotten too big and has begun monopolizing and parasitizing its host countries.
And they're supportive of BLM and similar groups, just like most big corporations.
It's just a way to point out that these people aren't "counter-culture" or anti-establishment by any stretch of the imagination. They like to larp like they're bringing down the corrupt system and sticking it to the man and fighting racism and whatever but in reality they're just choking out the man's competition. They're literal foot soldiers of the bourgeoisie.
I'm not exactly liberal but sympathetic and that shit doesn't bother me at all. If anything it shows that big business sold them down the fucking river and never gave Bernie a chance.
I guess there aren't as many rabid Bernie supporters as they made it look, and the overwhelming majority of them in college was an exception and not the norm among Democrats.
Asking questions is the best defense. Be confident in knowing that they don't understand what they are saying.
Ask them to clarify and define, until they turn hostile. Then just retort with any version of "no I don't believe I will", or "no I don't agree at all".
When they ask why just go back to asking them to define their idea. In public you win battles by showing that they're ignorant.
"What is genderfluid? No I asked what it is, not what it isn't - what is exactly it?"
"Is that a gender or a gender role? What exactly is the difference, you're not being clear."
You can do this with anything they believe. It's all a house of cards and will come crashing down.
"What exactly is the causal link between poverty and say rape? Explain to me the chain of events."
"Why are poor countries not more violent if poverty is the cause of violence?"
The trick is to not allow them to switch a subject, or move on to the next question until they either give an answer, or admit that they don't know. So keep repeating the question. Whenever they don't know, just repeat as if to confirm. "Ok so you don't know." "I see, so another thing you don't know."
If they hit you with "so you think you know" or "what's your explanation then" tell them "no no I agree we don't know, just I didn't expect that anser from you, in my expereicen keeping an open mind is not somethings that liberals are willing to do with controversail subjects, but of course I agree we don't know why blacks commit more rape who knows what the reason can be, I'm just surprised you agree with that".
It helps is you start the debate with: "Ok, I will be happy to have this talk with you, but you know that I have experienced that people on the left soon turn to humilation, sarcasm, mocking, and treating their opponents as children, and sometimes are downright mean. I will trust that you're not one of those though". Then when they inevitably turn hostile, point it out. "hey I thought we agreed that you won't talk down to me like other liberals always do".
If they escalate it's ok, you want the mask to come off, just stay calm. Remember that it is you staying calm that is causing them to take the mask off and to not know how to handle you. As soon as you lash out, they will be at ease and on known territory. They need to feel superior to feel at ease, and regardless of what they say the fact that you are calm is making them feel inferior.
If they whatabout, position yourself outside whatever group they're attacking. You don't have to let them group you. "But right wingers are more hateful" -> "that's not my experience, generally they just seem to have their own preferences, but you would have to have this conversation with them, not me".
And as much as you can, use their own reasoning against them. Run their own purity tests on them whenever the opportunity presents itself.
My experience of trying to deconstruct their logic or to talk sense into them is that it just doesn't go anywhere. They have their rehearsed lines, and anything outside of that they resufe to engage with.
It's why I ended up with this faux socratic method of forcing them to be precise and seeing them squirm when they keep contradicting themselves.
“I write about ‘Whiteness,’ a condition that generates racism and I explicitly distinguish it from ‘whiteness,’ a marker of racial identity. I write that white people are particularly susceptible to the pathology of ‘Whiteness.’”
It looks like being white isn't enough to "have Whiteness." Only the condition is capitalized. It's participatory and basically boils down to either "acting white" or "acting white with assumed privilege." For an article on behalf of a major institute is doesn't explain the definition particularly well.
Note this is not the APA (psychiatric) group. This is a group I've never heard of.
White pride worldwide!
I will never apologize for being White.
This is what it say to people who say this shit.
They claim to hate White people, but boy they sure love living in White society.
Psychoanalysis is a discredited field. I care about their opinions on the subject about as much as I care about the opinions of the Flat Earth Society on the space program.
Is any rational person still clinging to the fantasy that white people are not under attack?
Of course there's a cure. It's usually administered to the back of the head.
Interesting how they are so bothered by “whiteness” but refuse to move to a non western country.
You can’t lose when the opposing team scores for you.
Google "white feminism" dude. Also, "Karen" is exclusively a white female slur
This is just a stepping stone - white women have been targets of anti-white persecution for a while now. Sure it's not as prevalent as with men, but it's very clearly the next step.
Plenty of recent examples, but here's a very recent one:
Oxfam training guide blames ‘privileged white women’ over root causes of sexual violence (archived link)
[...]
White women are next on the chopping block.
I don't put much faith in sexual assault allegation, but that doesn't follow. Unless you think the Muslim child grooming gangs are all massive hoaxes.
Grooming gangs.
But of course. Still, female White victims.
Until someone comes up with a “final solution” to the “white question”. No surprise that regressives’ obsession with Nazis stems from projection as usual.
The solution is to encourage interbreeding until there are only shades of brown. I remember being given propaganda in 7th grade showing that as the beautiful future of the world.
Which is just dumb.
If we're going to go full human eugenics, we should find the people with the most green-tint and blue-tint in their skin tones and breed them selectively. Then we breed for pointed ears and longevity. Once they've genetically drifted enough that interbreeding causes infertile mules, propagandize the children to think they've been this way since the dawn of time, known for their superior arts and culture over hugh-manns. We gon make ourselves some elves.
How boring to just go "uniform light brown, that's humanity's future."
I’ve reached a point where I don’t even argue with people that get off on bashing white people. I simply ask them why they haven’t moved to a non majority white country. Particularly one with a brutal dictator.
I don't get it.
Most people are generally aware Amazon has gotten too big and has begun monopolizing and parasitizing its host countries.
And they're supportive of BLM and similar groups, just like most big corporations.
It's just a way to point out that these people aren't "counter-culture" or anti-establishment by any stretch of the imagination. They like to larp like they're bringing down the corrupt system and sticking it to the man and fighting racism and whatever but in reality they're just choking out the man's competition. They're literal foot soldiers of the bourgeoisie.
Ah ok, that's always been obvious to me but I assumed he was coming at it from a different angle.
That’s a lot of truth there.
I'm not exactly liberal but sympathetic and that shit doesn't bother me at all. If anything it shows that big business sold them down the fucking river and never gave Bernie a chance.
I guess there aren't as many rabid Bernie supporters as they made it look, and the overwhelming majority of them in college was an exception and not the norm among Democrats.
Do you mean masochism?
Asking questions is the best defense. Be confident in knowing that they don't understand what they are saying.
Ask them to clarify and define, until they turn hostile. Then just retort with any version of "no I don't believe I will", or "no I don't agree at all".
When they ask why just go back to asking them to define their idea. In public you win battles by showing that they're ignorant.
"What is genderfluid? No I asked what it is, not what it isn't - what is exactly it?"
"Is that a gender or a gender role? What exactly is the difference, you're not being clear."
You can do this with anything they believe. It's all a house of cards and will come crashing down.
"What exactly is the causal link between poverty and say rape? Explain to me the chain of events."
"Why are poor countries not more violent if poverty is the cause of violence?"
The trick is to not allow them to switch a subject, or move on to the next question until they either give an answer, or admit that they don't know. So keep repeating the question. Whenever they don't know, just repeat as if to confirm. "Ok so you don't know." "I see, so another thing you don't know."
If they hit you with "so you think you know" or "what's your explanation then" tell them "no no I agree we don't know, just I didn't expect that anser from you, in my expereicen keeping an open mind is not somethings that liberals are willing to do with controversail subjects, but of course I agree we don't know why blacks commit more rape who knows what the reason can be, I'm just surprised you agree with that".
It helps is you start the debate with: "Ok, I will be happy to have this talk with you, but you know that I have experienced that people on the left soon turn to humilation, sarcasm, mocking, and treating their opponents as children, and sometimes are downright mean. I will trust that you're not one of those though". Then when they inevitably turn hostile, point it out. "hey I thought we agreed that you won't talk down to me like other liberals always do".
If they escalate it's ok, you want the mask to come off, just stay calm. Remember that it is you staying calm that is causing them to take the mask off and to not know how to handle you. As soon as you lash out, they will be at ease and on known territory. They need to feel superior to feel at ease, and regardless of what they say the fact that you are calm is making them feel inferior.
If they whatabout, position yourself outside whatever group they're attacking. You don't have to let them group you. "But right wingers are more hateful" -> "that's not my experience, generally they just seem to have their own preferences, but you would have to have this conversation with them, not me".
And as much as you can, use their own reasoning against them. Run their own purity tests on them whenever the opportunity presents itself.
It waries for sure.
My experience of trying to deconstruct their logic or to talk sense into them is that it just doesn't go anywhere. They have their rehearsed lines, and anything outside of that they resufe to engage with.
It's why I ended up with this faux socratic method of forcing them to be precise and seeing them squirm when they keep contradicting themselves.
Marxism is a parasitic condition and the permanent cure is lead to the head.
The author:
just FYI, "Moss" is an americanization of "Moses"
It looks like being white isn't enough to "have Whiteness." Only the condition is capitalized. It's participatory and basically boils down to either "acting white" or "acting white with assumed privilege." For an article on behalf of a major institute is doesn't explain the definition particularly well.
Note this is not the APA (psychiatric) group. This is a group I've never heard of.
White pride worldwide! I will never apologize for being White. This is what it say to people who say this shit. They claim to hate White people, but boy they sure love living in White society.
Psychoanalysis is a discredited field. I care about their opinions on the subject about as much as I care about the opinions of the Flat Earth Society on the space program.