Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

23
What’s this about Quantum Computing?
posted 4 years ago by redman012 4 years ago by redman012 +23 / -0

Saw a comment on a banking thread that said that Quantum Computing will kill crypto, I assume because it would be able to edit the blockchain and thus killing the entire point of bitcoin, but how exactly would it do this? How does it work and why does it mean all current encryption would become useless?

25 comments share
25 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (25)
sorted by:
▲ 10 ▼
– exarch 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0

how would it be possible to check all possibilities at once

It's a cool fact about the universe that will blow your mind: in some ways, the universe doesn't appear to be "computational" - meaning, it doesn't act like a computer.

One interpretation for the things we see at the quantum level is the Many Worlds interpretation. This is the idea that there are literally an infinite number of alternate universes, with infinitely more of them being created from moment to moment.

Got a pair of sunglasses? Okay, the lenses are polarized. When a photon reflects off a surface, the photon becomes polarized, and when that photon encounters a polarized lens, there's a chance it will be blocked by the lens, and a chance it will go through. This is why your sunglasses reduce the glare of light reflected off the windshields of cars.

The Many Worlds hypothesis says that when the photon becomes polarized, it doesn't actually "decide" at that moment which way it's polarized. And it wont ever bother to decide unless someone measures it (like for example with a polarized filter). At the moment when it's measured, according to this theory, the entire universe splits in two, and there's a universe where the measurement went one way and a whole other universe where it went the other way. There are literally two different versions of you, the observer - one in the universe where the photon made it through, and one where it was blocked.

And this is an interpretation that scientists take seriously because there's real evidence for it. You can probably see how this could not possibly be computational - it wouldn't be possible to build a computer that actually simulated this. You can't build a computer that actually does all the universes.

I don't have a really good practical understanding of quantum computers. I know that they very carefully keep particles in the wave state (they don't measure the particles). They let the particles become entangled with other particles, and they measure those. And somehow, they are able to use this to get results in a single operation that, in a classical computer would require brute force (you'd have to check every possibility).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– lapalapa 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

And it wont ever bother to decide unless someone measures it (like for example with a polarized filter).

A filter isn't a measurement. The photon will remain as probability until observed by a conscious mind.

And this is an interpretation that scientists take seriously because there's real evidence for it.

There isn't evidence. Scientists affirm many worlds because they are against the idea of consciousness solidifying reality.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– exarch 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

A filter isn't a measurement.

A filter is a measurement.

The photon will remain as probability until observed by a conscious mind.

The photon is blocked or passes through regardless of the presence of a conscious mind. The video you got this from, with the creepy animated guy, lied to you. Also, "What the *bleep* do we know" lied to you.

There isn't evidence.

There is evidence.

Scientists affirm many worlds because they are against the idea of consciousness solidifying reality.

And you reject many worlds because you like the idea of consciousness solidifying reality. What you need to do is propose an experiment that has a different result if a consciousness is involved than if no consciousness is involved.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy