And here I thought it was a joke. It must take actual effort for them to maintain that level of faggotry.
This is a good analysis. Rarely is anything unintentional in movie production, especially something with this much cultural influence and activist interest behind it. Somebody was making decisions about every little detail, and their motivations aren't a mystery - they'll shout them as loudly and as often as they can.
A couple years ago, I thought about how I would effectively control Reddit with bots, if I had the opportunity, and I decided that sport subs would be a great place to farm karma and comments, while looking just like a human.
The way I imagined it, you would have networks of bots, say 20-50 active accounts, that act autonomously most of the time, posting pointless comments and memes. You'd then have one or more operators on these accounts, who occasionally take them over to agitate - posting highly inflammatory comments and attacking non-prog comments.
Sports subs make a great location for farming, because you need almost no input to have long comment chains where words are written, but no new information is exchanged. People can go on and on, regurgitating the same known facts about ref calls and player records, back and forth, in ways that bots can very easily understand and replicate. Hell, most of that is probably already in machine-readable databases created by sports autists.
I wouldn't be surprised if fewer than half of /r/baseball's users were actually human. It certainly wouldn't be if I were a bad actor.
Only because her sexuality has been overshadowed by the most forced interpretation of being "trans." Seriously, libs now read the overwhelmingly obvious reincarnation analogue that are the Trill as some tranny shit.
I've had the same problems with washers and dryers. I'm fairly certain the manufacturers don't even know that metallurgy is a thing. You can't just grab any random Chinese scrap lying around, melt it into a washer, and expect the spin cycle not to rip the thing apart.
That literally is it, I tested it repeatedly because it wasn't a hobby OS, I needed it to work. It was one of the Mint 20 distros. The installation could be completely clean, five minutes old, sat idle the whole time. Thumb drive in, thumb drive out, restart, and it's locked up.
I have never, ever been in a position where unplugging a USB device bricked my Windows installation. Meanwhile, if a USB storage device on my laptop running Mint gets unplugged without being dismounted (which happens, it's a laptop), I better start backing shit up because that installation is now ruined. Next time I try to boot, it just won't.
When I tell Linux creatures this story, they act like I'm just making shit up, or I must just be retarded, as if it's my first time using a computer and I haven't extensively tested this for my own sake. That Linux has real issues is beyond them.
In any other era, a man who wasted that much water for a fucking widget would have been executed.
I've said it before, but 40k itself is difficult for progs to possess. Their only real "in" was the T'au, and nobody really gives a shit about them. 40k as a franchise is propped up almost entirely by the Imperium, whose existence is justified by the existence of Chaos. Nonetheless, the Imperium has to be bad guys, because they're coded as icky Europeans (no matter how many British-accented blacks you shove into uniforms).
I suspect they'll have to settle for the takeover of online 40k spaces, which they more or less already have. They'll say some shit like "The God-Emperor says trans rights" and then just mass-ban anyone who correctly points out that the Emperor would have incinerated their kind with one short, incredibly angry thought. If it goes any farther than that, there won't be a 40k left.
OP appears to be real. He's got a post history going back almost two years, including posting in a BPD support sub (surprise), and complaining about a year ago that his son was now being home-schooled because his mother and stepfather politically disagreed with the prog shit in their public schools, mentioning CRT by name.
Either that or this is a very elaborate and long-term game. I don't know that either is crazier than the other.
It's actual brainrot. It's possible that domesticating wolves helped our socialization as a species, and we're so damn good at civilization that we (sort of) won over cats, creatures that are still aloof and skittish even today when feral, but some lib uses the word "furbaby" and now pets are degenerate, or something. It's a good thing the vast majority of us don't need horses for labor anymore, or half this site would be getting gored trying to figure out oxen just to spite horse girls.
Is there anything so worthless that liberals won't steal your money to pay for it if it includes the words "women and minorities?"
If they've been renting land to Twitter to operate, they're not unafilliated. For years, Twitter was a propaganda platform against whites, men, Christians, and civil society in general. I don't know precisely where the line between collaborator and citizen is drawn, but I'm certain whoever owns those lands and buildings gets to share in the blame.
When women say "allowed to do x," they typically mean "celebrated doing x," because they've never been told "no" with any sort of regularity.
crying theatrically
Well I guess that confirms nobody wanted to knock the author up - pregnant women aren't especially well known for not bursting into tears. If running out of peanut butter can do it, I'm pretty sure being accosted by five youths is a perfectly good excuse.
And of course, bikes.
Fucking again?? Just throw him in prison already, dress and all. It's clearly what he wants. Who are we to deny him his right to be sodomized by swarthy prison gentlemen for the rest of his life?
Breaking a buck is, yes. The specific phrase "buck breaking" is now a reference to a (likely fictional) act of punishing and humiliating a male slave by raping him. A couple years ago, Tariq Nasheed, a black supremacist and grifter, made a movie titled Buck Breaking in reference to it, which was (ostensibly) about the demasculization of black boys and men. That's how the term entered public awareness.
The State Department has its own intelligence agency, called the Bureau of Intelligence and Research. US intelligence doesn't even try to hide its tendrils in half the executive branch. And that's just what they're willing to admit. The term "Deep State" makes it sound like it's a secret, when they're a lot closer to outright declaring themselves rulers than being an actual conspiracy.
I know one of these college-educated NPCs. Not so much a leftist as he is an actual fucking robot. Last time we were having an argument and I used the word "race" in the context of modern racial politics, it triggered that huge spiel about race not existing...even though it had absolutely zero relevancy to the conversation.
I'd have pointed that out to him, but he's honestly too fucking stupid to have understood.
Anyways, yes, they're pushing hard for this, because they don't have any way to account for racial disparities at this point. They're at the point where they have to suppress the very idea of race, and in the process, breaking their lesser model NPCs.
Quoting a random minority who doesn't know the difference between "less" and "fewer" is how I know this is legit. Even I know and I'm borderline retarded with English.
Do I even want to know why the fuck you're ranting about aliens?
Or maybe because I don't like having my writing censored as I type..?
Does Docs actually do this? I've had to use a lot of Sheets, but obviously it's a different beast.
Okay...so what exactly is the $42,000 for? Or does the "hidden costs" in the headline mean hidden from the reader?
I don't know enough about who they're polling to know for sure, but I suspect if you polled Brits randomly, you'd probably end up at least at something like a 1:5 ratio minimum, not 1:20. If only 5% of the population was on their side, they'd have to step up their game from disenfranchisement to outright disappearances. 20% is probably just enough to control a liberal democracy through mostly non-violent, mostly-institutional means, as long as you keep them politically active, like by making them fear their holy mission might fail.
News media and its offshoots aren't usually engaging with dissidents directly. The MSM is there to control the idiot masses through false consensus, and distribute the political orthodoxy to its followers. Through that lens, it makes sense for BBC to try to scare people by presenting a widespread "threat" to the orthodoxy.