Texas has an inalienable right to defend it's border from invasion.
This is not a debate on Federal authority versus State authority. The State has no obligation to abandon the defense of it's people. The Federal government has no authority to abandon the defense of it's borders.
The corollary to that: Why not conduct any atrocities you deem necessary?
It's not like the left's plan is co-existence with an honourably-defeated enemy, but rather the ideological extermination or a bunch of dangerous heretics.
It's not a necessity, it's a categorical imperative.
Rosseau explicitly stated that a reign of terror to coerce the rest of the population into compliance with "The General Will" is a moral good. From their perspective, atrocities are moral.
It's funny, isn't it, how this "General Will" always seems to align itself with communists?
Remarkably consistent, that, isn't it?
Mind you, it's not like the rest of communist literature isn't "Yeah, it's perfectly fine to genocide your enemies - if they didn't deserve it, they'd have submitted to you already!"
Rousseau did something weird and said, "well, if there's one vote and it wins 50.0000001% of the vote, then that is The General Will, and therefore that's moral to use terror."
Why one vote is iron clad, I have no idea. He's kind of a lunatic.
well, if there's one vote and it wins 50.0000001% of the vote, then that is The General Will, and therefore that's moral to use terror.
Interesting. You know more Rosseau than I do, I think, do you know how he rationalises plugging along with the subversion when communism inevitably doesn't win the necessary votes?
Also, this video is staged as fuck. Feds just happen to arrive at a specific spot on a miles long border where a family was totally waiting in the water for days behind an obviously visible barbed wire barrier, camera crew in tow?
Yeah but then we're fighting them at the front and the leftists at the back
Better to just create a clear path to the border and the blue cities, let them kill each other fighting for the limited resources there while we decide if it's worth trying to take the cities with force or turn them into parking lots..
Listen, unless we allow state border forces to have access to A10 warthogs for border security, there ain't any other solution. Texas ain't an island and is surrounded and infiltrated by saboteurs.
Any use of force even if the cartels brazenly attack the border, under the Biden administration, will be met with federal forces en mass using it as an excuse to usurp power from the state claiming they 'committed a massacre' by defending themselves.
Best on a practical level to keep funneling them on buses straight to blue cities until they collapse and destroy the leftist strongholds from within.
until they collapse and destroy the leftist strongholds from within.
And then what? This point keeps getting repeated but no one ever explains what happens after?
Do we just shoot the illegals once their task is done? Otherwise all you've done is kicked the can down the road just so you can Epically Own the Libz!
while we decide if it's worth trying to take the cities with force or turn them into parking lots..
So the first implies after they've weakened each other through internal conflict to take the cities back force
The latter, for parking lots you need a nice flat ground for perfect parking. On a side note, artillery is REALLY good at flattening the ground of obstacles, buildings, annoying fauna...
So you've already decided what to do with your loot and are salivating at the thought of getting to have fun with it. Classic egg before the chicken planning.
Please note though I asked what you are planning to do with the illegals after. Those millions upon millions of uncountable and undocumented people who you let loose into the nation to accomplish the task. Who breed like rabbits and have proven themselves willing to do many dirty acts to accomplish their own goals.
Are you planning on just shooting them? Why not just shoot the liberals then and save the middleman? What is the actual plan for after?
All leftist talk about overpopulation and environmental destruction has an implicit "by white people" clause attached to it. They don't care and you can't ever make them care about any damage done by non-white people.
Absolutely fuck everyone involved in this. The "migrants," the Border Patrol, and the retarded clapping seals.
Also, I knew where this was going at "Biden Deploys Troops to Border". They keep fucking doing it. I don't think this is even the tenth time feds have come in and unsecured the borders in Texas.
Honestly, Texas should probably make a statement they'll use lethal force on anyone breaching the border, including feds.
Exactly what I was expecting, though. They've done this shit repeatedly. Grates, gates, fences, barb wire. Feds keep coming in and destroying Texas's barricades, it's absurd.
Given your other statements, we both know you weren't asking for a trial.
For example, with Fauci: "he commited crimes against humanity, and should be charged under that framework. If it leads to his execution, all the better."
That's what it would look like if you weren't violating Rule 2.
Texas has an inalienable right to defend it's border from invasion.
This is not a debate on Federal authority versus State authority. The State has no obligation to abandon the defense of it's people. The Federal government has no authority to abandon the defense of it's borders.
The only authority the Federal government appears to recognise is that of the exercise of power...
Leftism is a Philosophy of War.
Since everything is a Melian Dialogue, they acknowledge nothing else. This is why there are no other options besides victory.
The corollary to that: Why not conduct any atrocities you deem necessary?
It's not like the left's plan is co-existence with an honourably-defeated enemy, but rather the ideological extermination or a bunch of dangerous heretics.
It's not a necessity, it's a categorical imperative.
Rosseau explicitly stated that a reign of terror to coerce the rest of the population into compliance with "The General Will" is a moral good. From their perspective, atrocities are moral.
It's funny, isn't it, how this "General Will" always seems to align itself with communists?
Remarkably consistent, that, isn't it?
Mind you, it's not like the rest of communist literature isn't "Yeah, it's perfectly fine to genocide your enemies - if they didn't deserve it, they'd have submitted to you already!"
Pretty much.
Rousseau did something weird and said, "well, if there's one vote and it wins 50.0000001% of the vote, then that is The General Will, and therefore that's moral to use terror."
Why one vote is iron clad, I have no idea. He's kind of a lunatic.
Interesting. You know more Rosseau than I do, I think, do you know how he rationalises plugging along with the subversion when communism inevitably doesn't win the necessary votes?
let alone intentionally sabotage it's border
The feds have now literally invaded a state.
Only now?
Also, this video is staged as fuck. Feds just happen to arrive at a specific spot on a miles long border where a family was totally waiting in the water for days behind an obviously visible barbed wire barrier, camera crew in tow?
They just happen to find the one family amongst a sea of men.
The only good news is that it suggests this effort is not widespread.
Shovel them all to New York and other blue cities/states, build a wall around them and turn them all into Arkham Cities.
I would've said megacities but we all know they don't have the balls to make Judges, because they'd be the first ones executed by them.
As they're an invading force, lethal response is legitimate.
Yeah but then we're fighting them at the front and the leftists at the back
Better to just create a clear path to the border and the blue cities, let them kill each other fighting for the limited resources there while we decide if it's worth trying to take the cities with force or turn them into parking lots..
Stop advocating for more invasion you traitorous fuckwit. Shipping them further into the country only makes everything worse.
Listen, unless we allow state border forces to have access to A10 warthogs for border security, there ain't any other solution. Texas ain't an island and is surrounded and infiltrated by saboteurs.
Any use of force even if the cartels brazenly attack the border, under the Biden administration, will be met with federal forces en mass using it as an excuse to usurp power from the state claiming they 'committed a massacre' by defending themselves.
Best on a practical level to keep funneling them on buses straight to blue cities until they collapse and destroy the leftist strongholds from within.
This isn't a solution. This is aiding enemy action.
You fucking moron.
And then what? This point keeps getting repeated but no one ever explains what happens after?
Do we just shoot the illegals once their task is done? Otherwise all you've done is kicked the can down the road just so you can Epically Own the Libz!
Please note I said this:
So the first implies after they've weakened each other through internal conflict to take the cities back force
The latter, for parking lots you need a nice flat ground for perfect parking. On a side note, artillery is REALLY good at flattening the ground of obstacles, buildings, annoying fauna...
So you've already decided what to do with your loot and are salivating at the thought of getting to have fun with it. Classic egg before the chicken planning.
Please note though I asked what you are planning to do with the illegals after. Those millions upon millions of uncountable and undocumented people who you let loose into the nation to accomplish the task. Who breed like rabbits and have proven themselves willing to do many dirty acts to accomplish their own goals.
Are you planning on just shooting them? Why not just shoot the liberals then and save the middleman? What is the actual plan for after?
I think that person isn't even American, so he/she doesn't care what happens any more than Mike Bloomberg.
bullets work on traitors just as well as they do on invaders.
Where the fuck are all the huntards with their population control talk NOW?!
All leftist talk about overpopulation and environmental destruction has an implicit "by white people" clause attached to it. They don't care and you can't ever make them care about any damage done by non-white people.
Damage done by non-whites is always indirectly blamed on whites.
It's crazy how they all funnel down the same cognitive pathway. Why are they like this?
They're not actually human.
Man, if I knew how to dissect what makes communists into communists, I'd make a million dollars selling a book about it instead of posting here.
"we need another plague"
another plague comes
"we're all in this together!!! if it saves just one life!!!"
Absolutely fuck everyone involved in this. The "migrants," the Border Patrol, and the retarded clapping seals.
Also, I knew where this was going at "Biden Deploys Troops to Border". They keep fucking doing it. I don't think this is even the tenth time feds have come in and unsecured the borders in Texas.
Honestly, Texas should probably make a statement they'll use lethal force on anyone breaching the border, including feds.
https://babylonbee.com/news/biden-deploys-troops-to-border-to-stop-texas-from-securing-border
So what exactly is happening in the video? State troopers letting them in? The video is too blurry and too far away to see.
Not exactly what I was expecting from the title.
Exactly what I was expecting, though. They've done this shit repeatedly. Grates, gates, fences, barb wire. Feds keep coming in and destroying Texas's barricades, it's absurd.
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Specifically the glorification part.
There is literally nothing wrong with defending one's nation against invasion.
Correct, you just don't know how to do that because you're venting on the internet.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Execution is the appropriate sentence for treason.
Given your other statements, we both know you weren't asking for a trial.
For example, with Fauci: "he commited crimes against humanity, and should be charged under that framework. If it leads to his execution, all the better."
That's what it would look like if you weren't violating Rule 2.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Stop psycho-posting.
They want us enslaved, our children raped and castrated, our history erased, and the problem you have is that I don't like them?
My problem is that you are calling for mass executions, and then you doubled down and wanted to do worse. Stop psycho-posting.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
No glowposting
Who elected you?
Why does democracy determine legitimacy?
I guess the better question is: how do we depose you?
For what purpose, to glowpost and make yourself and everyone else a target?
Nigger.
waves in shuck & jive
To allow open discourse, the entire reason we're here on a backup backup site, you disingenuous snake.
So the point of you making statements that will be used against you and others in a criminal court is "open discourse". Sorry, I don't buy it.
Do not advocate murder.
Holy shit you're fucking retarded.
At this point I think he's simply an enemy.
It's your prerogative to go wherever you want. You just can't call for murder.