Amongst other things. Just find it irritating how they have the nerve to call us out on these things while they have a meltdown because I say men can’t be women, or I was called a white supremacist for saying the little mermaid casting was stupid. But we are the ones who overreact. Az can be over the top at times but I can understand that annoyance of the catering to a tiny delusional percentage of the population.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
Had another thought I want to expand on.
When somebody refers to a normal person by "their" pronouns, it's not because they were told, it's because it's obvious. But it's also because they're being honest. In the most basic terms, they're experiencing the world and truthfully describing their perception. It's not something most of us even need to explain, it's just a natural state of living. Even literal drooling retards do this, to the best of their ability.
If an otherwise intelligent person repeatedly misgendered a normal person, it would be a problem. Not because of it's an insult, but because it's deeply dishonest. That's a level of dishonesty and belligerence that would make them incompatible with polite society. Being honest with your senses is the single most basic form of honesty there is, that's why we medicalize dishonest senses as "delusions." If you aren't suffering from delusions, you're just that dishonest by nature, then you're evil almost by definition.
Trannies use their social power to make us lie to remain in polite society, meaning any time we're in the presence of a tranny, we're a society of sociopaths, choosing to lie about our basic senses. What would otherwise be psychotic, violent anger is a totally healthy and justified reaction to a sociopathic society. Some dude having a whinge is almost too tame, by comparison.
No, see, you're looking at this from the etymological perspective of someone utilising tools (language) to describe a characteristic (perception).
The Left are using the tools of language to alter perception. This is why instead of trying to combat them from the intellectual perspective, simply refute their insistence on altering perceived reality.
My number one response to when they say, "Why are you so triggered over pronouns?!"
It's... "Because you're trying to defy reality to accommodate delusions."
You can use this basis for every aspect of their argument.
When they say.... "Don't be a tronsphobe; respect the pronouns bigot!"
Simply reply.... "Entertaining someone else's mentally ill fantasy is not living in reality."
These replies bypass the entire argument of Left-wing sophistry and semantics; it avoids pronouns as the topic, and instead directly addresses the fact that they are attempting to reorient how we describe and/or perceive objective reality.
Simply outlining their arguments as delusional, fantastical, and/or illogical completely nullifies any further need for them or for you to engage, because either they acknowledge they are entertaining delusions, or concede and leave. Though, I'm sure their next step would be to simply make it illegal to offer counterpoints at all.
Then they'll point to the word "you're" and laugh you out of the room. I didn't make that up, that is their current method of attack. It's just one example of how their language hacking is so insidious.
The problem with direct attacks is that normies exist. They're both valueless cowards who would literally rather kill you rather than be ostracized, and also make up the vast majority of social power just by sheer numbers. With lefties, for all their hand-wringing about bigotry, they love a bigot. There's nothing in the world they love more than having an excuse to go on the attack. As soon as the lefties attack en masse, the normies notice, and they side with the mob 100% of the time.
You know what scared the shit out of lefties, and got a lot of normies perking up? Superstraight. There's an inherit conflict between transgenderism and consent in the "transwomen are women" dialogue that normies could always see: If you identify as straight, and transwomen are women, not sleeping with a transwoman solely because she's trans is bigotry.
Superstraight didn't create the conflict between the tranny identity and sexual consent, it just found a way to embed it within itself, being implicitly obvious without being stated outright. Normies knew that conflict existed, but always had to talk around it. They didn't have the language to address it directly, not without fear of becoming a target.
There was no way for lefties to confront superstraight without either invalidating sexual consent, or invalidating trannies. So they didn't. They freaked the fuck out and shut it down as hard as possible. As long as it existed, the normies could speak truth without fear, and that would ruin the power trannies had over them. So leftists didn't take their time "playing" at righteous outrage. They didn't go after people's livelihoods or relationships for the sadistic glee. They just stomped it out as fast as they could, and hoped it wouldn't take root.
Superstraight made it to the front page of Reddit within a day or two, and "suck the girldick, bigot" never has.
You might call what I want to do language hacking, or you might call it meme magic. Our handicap is that we have to be truthful, and we don't have the same mechanism to enforce language as our enemies. But if it didn't work, they wouldn't be afraid.
This is also good because you leap ahead of them when they inevitably fall back on "You're being unreasonable". They LOVE painting their enemies as unreasonable.
I manage a residence for literal drooling retards ("individuals with developmental disabilities" as I say in my day to day...) -- and this is spot on. If I tried to explain to one of my people that a MAN who looks like a MAN should be called she/her, it would short-circuit their already-faulty wiring.
I mostly appreciate their candor and the bullshit-free existence that they lead.
I think you have a point about titles, but I also think it's just a perversion of perception enforced at gunpoint.