I remember when there was the idea of "Hollywood Ugly". They'd put some normal looking actor in thick glasses and he was supposed to be playing the ugly guy. Obviously you don't want an actual ugly person on screen.
Now they show me some creature with vitiligo and I'm like why would I choose to consume this? "ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!"
Its not out yet. But after the shit heap that was 3, and personal opinion from me but garbage fire that was 2 as well, its almost impossible that there will be.
Like, the wokeness of it is basically unimportant because it should be denied entry on principle of its being made as an Xbox Exclusive from a Company that has literally only made Forza racing games and is attached to Peter Molyneaux, one of the most notorious liars in gaming history. Even if he isn't part of this, they are still using his brand name to sell the game.
The only redeeming aspect of it was the trailer with the fairy getting eaten by the frog and the ridiculous copypasta that it spawned.
It's worth noting that male feminists are all sex pests, so they only people they know are actually just compulsive masturbators, thus, they extrapolate that to the rest of us.
Why is it whenever we say we dont want a character to look ugly , the leftists and only fan prostitutes come out to say we only want to jerk off to the character
You're looking at it from the wrong perspective.
This isn't about YOUR preference, it's about the consequence for your lack of acquiescence.
More simply put, think about what the end goal is if you can cultivate the masses to comply under the threat of being ostracised?
This isn't about "ugly females", it's about servitude and compliance. It's been inches taken that have been stretched into untold kilometres.
Even more simply put, they will keep using this tactic for every single thing they take; they will use the cultural appropriation (in the literal sense) to affect politics downstream of that culture.
If you get people to comply to ugly characters under threat of being ostracised, you can get people to comply to the alphabet nonsense under the threat of being ostracised. If you can get people to comply with alphabet nonsense under the threat of being ostracised, you can get people to comply with MAPs, economic equity, and racial genocide under the threat of being ostracised.
Nothing is off limits if you can get people to simply comply. That's why it's so important to not comply. See, for example, the people who have complied with unmitigated immigration because they didn't want to be ostracised for being "racist".
It's why it's so damning for Western society when you do see normies comply because it means they will accept the next stage, which is legislation (as we've already see in some states/regions where they can convince people to use terms like "birthing people", or enforce gender neutral bathrooms, or allow for child transitioning).
Compliance is enablement, and enablement of unfettered regressive agendas under the guise of progressivism ends in enslavement.
It's most amusing when someone who claims not to be an SJW leftist throws those insults at us. I always wonder if its a dropping-the-mask moment or they just have some weird psychological issues.
I hate the “you’re just mad you can’t jerk off to the character”. As I keep pointing out, they never seem to be offended by 10/10 males. Also if I see a guy that women find attractive I don’t whine about it.
And it seems they ONLY draw (or want you to draw) stuff they themselves like to jack off to. So they assume that you also only like or draw pictures that you want to jack off to.
It's the exact same mentality that led ancient people to ban the drawing of ANY animate being, because they think everyone is going to worship it - because they think people worship statues and pictures, like they do, or would.
guess they are afraid onlyfan whores lose their simp money if all female characters look like the witcher 3 girls and get rule34 a lot. Weirdly enough they dont have a problem with it if its an expensive dlc/mtx skin you buy which is sexy. They love to double dip.
it's because all of the examples you give as counter arguments are basically just hentai. oh, yeah, chun-li is "well designed", that's why you like her.
dude, if anything, i'm on your side here. i say it as genuine constructive criticism when i tell you that making porn addicts your bedfellows just to own the libs won't help anything. the moment you have people pointing to japanese digital child porn as an example of free speech and Dead or Alive as an example of "beauty in art" you've given your opponent a free win.
it's a real issue around these parts, whether you'd like to pretend otherwise or not.
just throw their retweets in their face with a "this you?"
every single one that says this is some kind of weird sex pervert.
"your likes are public"
I remember when there was the idea of "Hollywood Ugly". They'd put some normal looking actor in thick glasses and he was supposed to be playing the ugly guy. Obviously you don't want an actual ugly person on screen.
Now they show me some creature with vitiligo and I'm like why would I choose to consume this? "ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!"
'Member Ugly Betty?
There's your example.
Is there any redeeming value to the new Fable game?
Its not out yet. But after the shit heap that was 3, and personal opinion from me but garbage fire that was 2 as well, its almost impossible that there will be.
Like, the wokeness of it is basically unimportant because it should be denied entry on principle of its being made as an Xbox Exclusive from a Company that has literally only made Forza racing games and is attached to Peter Molyneaux, one of the most notorious liars in gaming history. Even if he isn't part of this, they are still using his brand name to sell the game.
The only redeeming aspect of it was the trailer with the fairy getting eaten by the frog and the ridiculous copypasta that it spawned.
It's worth noting that male feminists are all sex pests, so they only people they know are actually just compulsive masturbators, thus, they extrapolate that to the rest of us.
You're looking at it from the wrong perspective.
This isn't about YOUR preference, it's about the consequence for your lack of acquiescence.
More simply put, think about what the end goal is if you can cultivate the masses to comply under the threat of being ostracised?
This isn't about "ugly females", it's about servitude and compliance. It's been inches taken that have been stretched into untold kilometres.
Even more simply put, they will keep using this tactic for every single thing they take; they will use the cultural appropriation (in the literal sense) to affect politics downstream of that culture.
If you get people to comply to ugly characters under threat of being ostracised, you can get people to comply to the alphabet nonsense under the threat of being ostracised. If you can get people to comply with alphabet nonsense under the threat of being ostracised, you can get people to comply with MAPs, economic equity, and racial genocide under the threat of being ostracised.
Nothing is off limits if you can get people to simply comply. That's why it's so important to not comply. See, for example, the people who have complied with unmitigated immigration because they didn't want to be ostracised for being "racist".
It's why it's so damning for Western society when you do see normies comply because it means they will accept the next stage, which is legislation (as we've already see in some states/regions where they can convince people to use terms like "birthing people", or enforce gender neutral bathrooms, or allow for child transitioning).
Compliance is enablement, and enablement of unfettered regressive agendas under the guise of progressivism ends in enslavement.
It's most amusing when someone who claims not to be an SJW leftist throws those insults at us. I always wonder if its a dropping-the-mask moment or they just have some weird psychological issues.
If those are my options...I'mma go jerk off. Peace.
I hate the “you’re just mad you can’t jerk off to the character”. As I keep pointing out, they never seem to be offended by 10/10 males. Also if I see a guy that women find attractive I don’t whine about it.
Because they think that beauty can only possibly hold sexual connotations, and nothing else.
because jews killed every single form of love except for "people masturbating each other with each other's bodies" in the minds of average people
if a lefty saw father on the street telling his young daughter that he loves her, they'd probably call the police and think guy is a pedo
in their minds you either want to fuck/jerk off to something, or you hate it because you can't
Because it works on most people, which is all that matters to them, and they don't have the capacity to feel shame for their own dishonesty.
Because that's what THEY do.
And it seems they ONLY draw (or want you to draw) stuff they themselves like to jack off to. So they assume that you also only like or draw pictures that you want to jack off to.
It's the exact same mentality that led ancient people to ban the drawing of ANY animate being, because they think everyone is going to worship it - because they think people worship statues and pictures, like they do, or would.
if imma play a game, i dont wanna look at ugly fags for 10, 20.. 70 hours or hundreds of thousands of hours.
guess they are afraid onlyfan whores lose their simp money if all female characters look like the witcher 3 girls and get rule34 a lot. Weirdly enough they dont have a problem with it if its an expensive dlc/mtx skin you buy which is sexy. They love to double dip.
Because sex is the only frame of reference they can understand.
They are slaves to their lusts so they conclude everyone else is as well.
Because they are NPCs, that is what they are programmed to do.
it's because all of the examples you give as counter arguments are basically just hentai. oh, yeah, chun-li is "well designed", that's why you like her.
People normally just say "final fantasy" and move on with 40+ perfectly good examples. Why put effort into you low-effort trolls?
dude, if anything, i'm on your side here. i say it as genuine constructive criticism when i tell you that making porn addicts your bedfellows just to own the libs won't help anything. the moment you have people pointing to japanese digital child porn as an example of free speech and Dead or Alive as an example of "beauty in art" you've given your opponent a free win.
it's a real issue around these parts, whether you'd like to pretend otherwise or not.
Exactly this. A leftist will always accuse you of that which they are guilty.
If a liberal calls you a racist, they're admitting they hate whites.
If a liberal calls you a bigot, they're admitting they hate Christians.
If a liberal calls you a Nazi, they're admitting they're a commie.
Jidf always call people inbreds
A wise man once said they always lie, project, and double down.