"Either you accept the ugly or you want to jerk off. "
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
You're looking at it from the wrong perspective.
This isn't about YOUR preference, it's about the consequence for your lack of acquiescence.
More simply put, think about what the end goal is if you can cultivate the masses to comply under the threat of being ostracised?
This isn't about "ugly females", it's about servitude and compliance. It's been inches taken that have been stretched into untold kilometres.
Even more simply put, they will keep using this tactic for every single thing they take; they will use the cultural appropriation (in the literal sense) to affect politics downstream of that culture.
If you get people to comply to ugly characters under threat of being ostracised, you can get people to comply to the alphabet nonsense under the threat of being ostracised. If you can get people to comply with alphabet nonsense under the threat of being ostracised, you can get people to comply with MAPs, economic equity, and racial genocide under the threat of being ostracised.
Nothing is off limits if you can get people to simply comply. That's why it's so important to not comply. See, for example, the people who have complied with unmitigated immigration because they didn't want to be ostracised for being "racist".
It's why it's so damning for Western society when you do see normies comply because it means they will accept the next stage, which is legislation (as we've already see in some states/regions where they can convince people to use terms like "birthing people", or enforce gender neutral bathrooms, or allow for child transitioning).
Compliance is enablement, and enablement of unfettered regressive agendas under the guise of progressivism ends in enslavement.