TBF, nothing is more traumatic to the left than self-reflection.
She doesn't realise that if she's made time for tens of thousands, she doesn't have any left for one. [i_don't_consent.stonetoss.meme]
Have you read 50 Shades of Grey? Neither have I, but I think we're gonna need more leashes.
If past society had modern convenience, they couldn't point at a single improvement.
I... honestly wish you hadn't...
They didn't make those billions selling the game [cough] shark cards [cough cough]. They could go free to play and make back their investment in the 1st month.
They're finally gonna make people actually, LITERALLY babysit the escort mission.
Thing is, they were right for the wrong reasons. There isn't any hero fatigue, it's just "The message" fatigue. People are fed up with the decline in quality, and no amount of nostalgia from previous instalments can keep the momentum going forever.
This "wahmin respectur" thinks women will honestly tell you what they want from a man and has instead failed every shit-test he's ever been given. I bet money this bitch goes to therapy and opens up to women about his emotions- no quicker way to dry a vagina than presenting weakness as a man.
It's a funny thought to think Christmas is his seasonal job, but the rest of the year he plays cupid. Not too sure I'd like to imagine him dressed as a cherub, though [shudder].
TBF, it's always been stated the plan was to only allow legal content on the platform- you can't ask for a more reasonable stance. It's either take down the content or no twitter at all. I just hope it's regional censorship.
"London used to be an English city"
If you're honestly suggesting they would suddenly gain narrative skills just because the characters are black, I have a story about a bridge to tell you.
A human? (I'm joking, that fruit was so low it started growing a tree in China)
He's not the intended audience, he's the intended target. Small distinction.
As ever, they don't want free speech, they want their speech. Not even to be free, but rather mandatory- after all, "silence is violence" don't you know! You will affirm leftist thought, bigot.
it can be both a stupid opinion and! and a stupid statement
While technically true, it's not stupid just because you don't like it. There's nothing wrong with liking or hating one group to a greater extent than the other for whatever reason. That doesn't preclude hating both sides. I think DoctorRandomercam coined the term Zebra-crossing fallacy for just this kind of moment.
EDIT: if you do watch the video link, not subtly calling you a cunt- Stephen Colbert, however... I'd say the whole video is worth a watch, though- Your Mileage May Vary.
the only reason why they've gotten this far is because people are pussies now
That's certainly a contributing factor, but the main reason is that the pussies are in control. They are on the dev teams, managing the social media and manufacturing consensus through the corporate press.
people had more self respect for the fans and their rep
Those people were outnumbered, pressured, brainwashed or replaced by lunatics.
Unfortunately, she assimilated perfectly.
I quite enjoy the response "Fuck off, tourist"
Violent, murderous rapists pillaging the British isles? Checks out.
ran out of
lol
Real world people: Clown Judge gets the bullet too
Clown world people: This is fine; we voted for this.
"You wouldn't kill the frog while he transports you across the river, right?"
Scorpion: "Oy Vey, how arachnophobic. I would NEVER!"
saying one is less bad then the other is a stupid statement
No, it's an opinion. What's stupid is that you're so hung up on the single point that he doesn't specifically hate both groups as much as you want him to, yet he does hate both.
You wrote in another comment:
that's what the karan's did back then aswell, with harrypotter, table games, and video games, rap and rock music so on and so on
But I don't remember not being able to play or enjoy any of that entertainment. By that metric alone, they were better enemies just by being less effective.
They don't even need to be less retarded than their audience, just slightly less so than the effort required to care past the headline. It just needs to sit at the back of their consciousness under "could be true, but I didn't bother to check it out".
Once someone else parrots the "fact", it resurfaces as "yeah, I heard that too". Thus, false consensus is born. You think you hate journalists enough, but you don't.