7
FromTheShadows 7 points ago +7 / -0

I know one way they can reduce costs: stop hiring Hollywood actors to voice all the characters, and go back to regular voice actors.

7
FromTheShadows 7 points ago +7 / -0

What are they gonna do? Ship him on a plane back home, toss him into the nearest embassy and let them deal with him, or drop him into the ocean?

22
FromTheShadows 22 points ago +22 / -0

Wish that blond bitch would have shut the fuck up and let him talk.

5
FromTheShadows 5 points ago +6 / -1

Then you can go live in the post-apocalyptic ruins caused by that dipshit Japanese kid who couldn't just find the decency to kill himself. By the way, he'll be you only company in the world. Well, him and the redheaded bitch. Have fun!

19
FromTheShadows 19 points ago +19 / -0

But he doesn't count because trannies aren't violent! Anthony Hopkins and Jodie Foster said so!

16
FromTheShadows 16 points ago +16 / -0

Out of 29 men, only about maybe 5 were policitically incompatible with her. Which would mean the vast majority are more in lockstep with her views. And yet she can't stand men who are easily triggered, do copious amounts of drugs, don't work, aren't legal citizens, or are into sexual degeneracy. All things that her politics encourage.

One thing I do notice about her complaints is that she never says the actual dates were bad. She just didn't like the guys. And while some of these guys do sound like they could be awful people or irritating to be around (though I need actual context to make a call on that, not some random chick's rants), others don't sound like they were bad at all; they just weren't the kind of people she was looking for in a relationship. If you don't like them, fine, that's your prerogative. Be as petty about your wants and needs as you like. But don't bitch about how awful your dating experience has been. The purpose of dating is for people to test the waters and see if they're compatible with one another. It's working as intended for you; your problem is that you call things off immediately for the pettiest of reasons.

And finally, list your dealbreakers on your profile yourself, like how you don't want children. Stop expecting everyone else to read your goddamn mind.

8
FromTheShadows 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yep. While she set herself as an opponent of Sarkeesian, she always softballed her. Which gave me the impression that Liana was always controlled opposition, or at least reluctant to attack her fellow female feminists.

Liana also portrays herself as pro-sex, but she would always echo the "anti-sex" feminists whenever the subject of The Witcher came up. For whatever reason, she just really had it out for that IP. And really, it seems like the only thing Liana truly differed on from the other feminists was the subject of big boobs. She doesn't really oppose their arguments or rhetoric; if anything, she's in full agreement with their rampant misandry. She just feels like they're also attacking her being she's buxom.

7
FromTheShadows 7 points ago +7 / -0

If Rowling has any integrity, then she should be spending every day for the rest of her life banging her head on the wall for her part in the creation of these wretches and the culture they've made that's now turning against her. But she's probably too busy sitting on her silver toilet and wiping her ass with hundred dollar bills imported from America to care while her country burns all around her.

14
FromTheShadows 14 points ago +14 / -0

Which is why that story died after a week. They realized they couldn't tie it into the George Floyd hysteria, so they shut up about it.

9
FromTheShadows 9 points ago +9 / -0

Dumbass headline makes it sound like it was a freak accident, the family were the ones at fault, and that no (black thug) criminals were involved at all.

14
FromTheShadows 14 points ago +14 / -0

It's real rich coming from the side that's so obsessed with "power dynamics." When it suits them, that is.

4
FromTheShadows 4 points ago +4 / -0

Must be the same guy that stole the Simpsons' Christmas.

2
FromTheShadows 2 points ago +3 / -1

To all One Piece fans: do you guys seriously need this? Did you even need the FIRST anime series? Does seeing it in motion really improve the story THAT much. Don't you think it's utterly ridicuous for a show to have OVER 1000 episodes and show no sign of stopping? Do you really need to see that old material reanimated again in the hope that they "get it right" this time? Is it really THAT much of a hassle to just read or reread the original source material to experience the story all over again?

3
FromTheShadows 3 points ago +3 / -0

A couple examples I know of would be Tenchi Muyo! and at least some of its assorted AU spinoffs, and Monster Musume.

5
FromTheShadows 5 points ago +5 / -0

While you're on the PKD kick, you could try watching Waking Life. It's a film where a variety of people talk about assorted subjects of existentialism, often with one hapless protagonist who seems to be living in a perpetual dream state where he awakens from one dream only to find himself in another. Definitely feels inspired by Philip K. Dick's writings. And Like A Scanner Darkly, it's completely rotoscoped. In fact...nevermind, it was made by the same guy, Richard Linklater.

2
FromTheShadows 2 points ago +2 / -0

You could interpret the entire book as someone's half-life-induced dream, or heck, maybe someone's regular dying dream, but even then , you're left with the question of whose dream we're seeing. Joe's? Runciter's? Pat Conley's. Some random loony named Philip? ^_~

4
FromTheShadows 4 points ago +4 / -0

We'll never know. The book gets so trippy toward the end that it's impossible to tell if any of the content in it was ever real in the first place, up to and including the beginning parts with Runciter.

11
FromTheShadows 11 points ago +11 / -0

Hasbro CEO Chris Cocks

Well, that explains a lot about what's going wrong with Hasbro.

by Lethn
5
FromTheShadows 5 points ago +5 / -0

Cyberpunk 2077's sole purpose is to forcefully re-insert Johnny Silverhand into the world after getting his useless terrorist ass deservedly killed. Either in the flesh (where a little cybersurgery can be done to make him look like his old self) or as an almighty AI god who could probably just upload himself to a physical body anyway. And to have him be played by Keanu Reeves endlessly to attract the normies who are convinced he's a good actor because of what the cinemtographers, stunt coordinators, and stuntmen did in those John Wick movies. All so he can dominate and be the center of every major Cyberpunk story going forward. V was just the expendible loser we're stuck playing as to facilitate that.

10
FromTheShadows 10 points ago +10 / -0

The original Baldur's Gate games are classics and very much worth playing. And there are no gay romances in them period.

However, if any game can be blamed for introducing the idea of romances in RPGs, everything annoying about them, and players' unhealthy obsession over them, it's definitely Baldur's Gate 2.

EDIT: I just remembered this isn't entirely true. While the original version of Baldur's Gate 2 had no gay romances, the Enhanced Edition that you're more likely to find now brought in some new companions, two of which can be romanced by a same-sex protagonist: Hexxat and Dorn. Don't know how they work or how they're written, but all the new characters in general are pretty divisive among fans, and Hexxat in particular is widely disliked, so it's probably best to ignore them.

Hilariously though, Hexxat is also a complete self-own. She's a lesbian, yes, and a BLACK one at that for double the points, but she's also an EVIL vampire who specifically PREYS on young women to sate her thirst for blood. The mission to recruit even involves letting her drain and kill a victim she has mind-controlled.

3
FromTheShadows 3 points ago +3 / -0

Does this almighty and all-knowing respector of all women realize that by talking over this woman and saying she's completely wrong, he's "mansplaining?'

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›