4
Filo76 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why do they always argue from the exceptions?

Yeah, rape is terrible but it accounts for a tiny fraction of all abortions.

Yes, many women were enslaved and oppressed in the past. But guess what? SO WERE MEN.

They could go to the desert and bitch about it raining too much. Or going to the jungle and bitch that it’s too dry.

16
Filo76 16 points ago +16 / -0

“1 in 4 Jews was a victim of a hate crime.”

I’m calling bullshit on that statistic. Of course, they call it a hate crime if you mildly disagree with a Jew.

They have to manufacture fake hate crimes to feed the narrative.

4
Filo76 4 points ago +4 / -0

It’s absurdly rare that a man abortion is required to save the mothers life.

But that’s a go to argument to justify using abortion as birth control.

The exception proves the rule but in clown world the exception IS the rule.

7
Filo76 7 points ago +8 / -1

I’m appreciative of the fact that woke women warn us with their hair color.

And Jews are like vegans and cross fitters. They take every single damn opportunity to tell us who they are.

5
Filo76 5 points ago +5 / -0

What about Fabulously Adventurous Guys with Spears? More legit.

8
Filo76 8 points ago +8 / -0

Bernie is older than Biden. Plus I’m not sure even he is in very good health.

1
Filo76 1 point ago +1 / -0

He really does need arrested for that haircut.

3
Filo76 3 points ago +3 / -0

Spray naked pixel hottie on wall.

Camp out.

Wait for enemy to stop and stare at wall.

Free kill.

1
Filo76 1 point ago +1 / -0

The demand for racism exceeds the supply?

6
Filo76 6 points ago +6 / -0

Might as well fill the seat with Ronald McDonald. Appropriate for the clown show that is the GOP.

8
Filo76 8 points ago +8 / -0

Imagine how happy she’ll be when they install an insect bar in her building.

2
Filo76 2 points ago +2 / -0

The nice thing about forums was/is that most weren’t up/downvote machines. I’ve come to loathe the mechanic.

People can cite factual evidence for an argument and be downvoted because they just don’t agree with it. Others can express a puffed up opinion and get upvotes by the hundreds. It is telling people that opinions are superior to facts.

Forums allow for discussion even with disagreements. Neither side is automatically judged by the number of votes they have. They stand on the merit of the words they say and not on votes.

8
Filo76 8 points ago +8 / -0

What is Ozempic?

Semaglutide is an antidiabetic medication used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and an anti-obesity medication used for long-term weight management.

So push for Americans to get fat then offer them a weight loss drug? Sounds about right.

“They’ve already bought off the doctors.” This is quite true. Doctors don’t treat patients anymore. They push pills. If there was a pill to mend broken bones and stitch up wounds they would push that as well. (They do have those pain meds however!)

I’ve become such a distrustful cynic of our healthcare industry since 2020…. And I’ve always been a little skeptical. they are as untrustworthy as big government at this point.

1
Filo76 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's really not that hard to imagine an abstract concept beyond reality.

Maybe for you and I, but I’m quite skeptical of the vast majority of humanity.

And I think you misunderstand what I mean by metaphysics

Yes I did. My brain read it as quantum physics for some reason. I’m quite familiar with metaphysics.

1
Filo76 1 point ago +2 / -1

You are still hung up on the physical world. That’s what I’m trying to point out. A physical entity cannot have been the origin of a physical universe. Even “metaphysical” still exists within the realm of the physical.

The only logical conclusion is something not physical created the universe. It’s an inescapable reality.

2
Filo76 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you want to call the unknown physics

I’m going to stop you there.

Because calling something “unknown physics” is still missing the point. You are making the mistake of describing something as a physical manifestation when it has to exist outside the realm of the universe.

It is something beyond our understanding because our understanding is limited to this universe.

2
Filo76 2 points ago +3 / -1

You missed my point. A creator or God or whatever you want to call it is outside of our natural universe. This creator does not have the laws of the universe apply to them because they are not bound by the laws of the universe. If they are not bound by the laws of the universe then nothing needs to have created them.

People who use the "Who created God?" argument need to understand this point. The creator has always existed. This concept is quite mind blowing because, as I said, we are bound by the finite terms and laws of our universe.

4
Filo76 4 points ago +5 / -1

I believe that is the limitations of our mind. We cannot comprehend a being that is infinite because all things in our life are finite.

We cannot comprehend a being that is outside of time and space because we live within those confines.

The universe would not exist, Should not exist in fact, If not for an outside influence.

Even our language is insufficient to describe this influence because our language is spatial.

It stands to reason that something put the universe in motion and that something is not bound by the laws of this universe, including time and space.

3
Filo76 3 points ago +3 / -0

Equal rights?

That’s like the USA right? They already have equal rights. Now they bitch because they don’t quite have enough superior rights.

5
Filo76 5 points ago +5 / -0

We’ve become so jaded and distrustful that we don’t give anyone the benefit of the doubt.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›