That's the plan. Fuck up the economy more because it's not quite bad enough for any incoming R win to be unable to deal with atm. Gotta create more fires for the other side to have to suffer with in the next 4 years.
Or, maybe it's other thing where you're still doing the same things over and over again but still refuse to accept blame for your own actions while deflecting and blaming others for things.
In other words, behaving like a stereotypical woman would.
I remember reading QC after an old friend mentioned it to me and then after I'd read quite a few of the pages said friend then mentioned how others had likened her to the character of Faye.
Who is a dumpsterfire of a person and still possibly not the worst person in the comic.
There are a few possible exceptions to that like Phoenix Point but Julian firmly shot his reputation to pieces by taking Epic's money, even though he also gave any refund asked for afterwards because he no longer needed any of the backers' cash.
The X-Com crowd was loyal enough to him up until that point they would have carried his pet project through fire but after burning them the wrong way it failed to rise even once, let alone subsequent times as per the game title might suggest.
I'd still take my favourite brain adled ranger who talks to a hamster over these likely self inserts. That's how poorly these not mentally hindered, one dimensional 2D characters score in my head.
BG1 didn't have the same companion depth as 2 did which is likely also one of the main features players loved about the sequel. Sure there were some characters who you'd rather launch into the Underdark via catapult like Anomen, or Keldorn, or Jahaera, or Haer'Dalis, sometimes Viconia, definitely Edwin, and a few others, but they were still characters that added to the experience because of both their various personal quests and interactions with both the player and other companions.
And for added fun and insanity there was the option of giving the idiotic talking sword Lilarcor to Minsc just for the concept of how utterly chaotic that pairing would be.
or just an example of vulgar British humor?
A reminder that Monty Python foretold a lot of woke topics in their films and sketches like with the man wanting to be a woman and have babies in Life of Brian, or the doctor in Meaning of Life replying to the new mother how it's too early to decide such things when she asks if her offspring is a boy or girl.
Jokes and satire of yesteryear is doctrine and rhetoric of today's clown world.
Happened with quite a few companies back then, and the MSM coverage at the time was what bluepilled a lot of Scots about the biases at the BBC, which many others in the UK later learned when their own interests were suddenly on the receiving end of the propaganda.
Now take this line of thought and apply it to almost everywhere else. Some people just seem to have a compulsion to give their thoughts on something without being prompted.
To some extent it's the perfect situation for online bloggers because they are quite literally speaking into a faceless void/camera lens, so the fact they are "talking" to others just gives them a reasonably credible excuse to waffle for hours on end.
And set fire to countless orangutans.