It's a start.
Well, they did because they weren't sure that the white powder wasn't some type of terrorist attack, so they had to call in hazmat, which means that they couldn't just keep it quiet.
We need to create and encourage methods of communicating that can't be cut off so easily.
Impossible to disagree.
Name the banks. Name the decision makers. Name the people who won't tell you the decision makers. Shine a light on the scum, Nigel.
Thanks, I didn't realize it was back in any capacity.
I don't know whether he ever had male lovers, but Lincoln was a giant faggot all the same.
The Axis were just as shitty as the Communists. We should have listened to Patton though. That was the mistake.
That's the same picture.
As have we all.
IN NYC?
Well there's her first mistake.
I'd argue that they're trained to understand that they can literally do anything they want when the word is uttered, so they will.
Mind-boggling how obtuse most of the population remains all the time.
It feels important to them, so it must be important to you.
Which is to say, they habitually project.
Yeah, I bet he's worried about that.
Gatekeeping is next to godliness.
Notice how you can remove the fraud adjective "cis" and "cisgender" from any sentence it appears in and the sentence still retains full explanatory power?
"I am a cisgender white male." vs. "I am a white male."
It conveys nothing of value. It's completely superfluous and only serves to try to make normal somehow abnormal. Wait, I'm wrong. It only serves to signal that one is part of the sex death cult that lives to punish normality wherever it finds it.
This chain of comments demonstrates it well. They're all brainwashed deviant idiots except the guy they're complaining about, who called it as he saw it.
Wasn't it Rogan's guest who suggested there is no Woke agenda?
They lost their fucking minds that it could happen.
Because someone in military intelligence needed them to.
That's exactly what's happening.
Because you'd also need confidence in the state legislatures you'd send them back to for review. What you're suggesting is that there is no means for the person given the authority to certify that the votes appear proper to not certify. If so, what's the point? Mere decorum and theater?