It's true. Not based on racial hatred, but on racial differences. To give everybody a chance and only select from the best will mean that one group succeeds more than others.
This is why white people are better swimmers, africans are better runners, etc. These kinds of racial differences must be recognized and accounted for.
Trump was a central figure, but he did not oppose the right issues. He thought that economy was more important than other areas, which is incorrect to some degree. He also did not come out in full support or opposition to q-anon and during his term almost entirely neglected rural white americans which were the reason he was elected at all.
Not to say that he was bad. He shows many positives towards rallying people and other caveats to consider. I think he did deserve a 2nd term and that the election was stolen from him, but he will not be the figure to give the public a call to action.
Some degree of central effort is needed. People need to rally behind individuals with certain values in mind. One main problem of "the right" is that it's all spread out rural with no actual communications network outside of local talk.
I don't think people like who you have named accomplish that, which is why I don't watch them. Their goal is to have a discussion and reach things through "reasonable terms" which will never happen, it will only be slow capitulation.
If everybody is isolated and not pointed in the same direction then no great efforts can be accomplished. The problem is getting a rallying figure that will actually be able to do something meaningful about the issues we currently face.
Yes this exactly. At some point it will likely be illegal to own a non-automatic car. They will say oh it's for reducing auto accidents. Either that or they will increase the price exponentially and make the automatic option as cheap as possible.
Everything for the sake of influencing people. People like dogs so lets adopt some and make horrible PR tweets about it. Oh nobody actually cared about the dog and it was stressed out so it attacked people, who could have seen that happen!
I don't really trust any leaked documents, there's a way higher chance of them being fake than real in the modern day.
The WEF is the one pushing the "Great Reset" stuff, and they're just one group. No single group controls everything, it's generally done by alliances of people as long as they have mutually agreed upon goals or ideals.
4chan specifically has been heavily botted since 2015 or so. I only briefly went there before, and /pol/ currently has massive amounts of things like forum sliding and worthless posts that are just meant to prevent actual discussion.
I believe that Twitter, Reddit, and Facebook also have bots to some degree. Likely to inflate numbers and generate a fake consensus. At the very least they are moderated to prevent organic growth from happening. Like Twitter's trends generally have to be approved or Youtube's tending page which is only filled with corporate bullshit.
It's been clear that these lockdowns are just being used to create their "Great reset" which is the plan to create a global governance and undermine national unity.
This is why you will see increasingly restricted travel. First from airplanes, then with cars. The justification will only be the "pandemic" as long as it's useful. Then they will move on to something else, like a cyber hacking event in order to censor the internet further.
The people in the governments are not doing anything, because there is nothing they can do. Some of the real people calling the shots are the ones who run major multinational companies. They have far more resources, ability to influence the public, and less restrictions on what they are legally able to do.
I've done some 3D modeling and texture making, as well as some programming in Game Maker. This is a small game I've been working on, it's like Final Fantasy Tactics.
I wouldn't want to be a main developer I think, but I wouldn't mind helping out if anybody needs some work done.
It's natural to look out for your family and care for their well being. When villages and cities were populated only by a single people group that includes them as an extended family in what Aristotle called philia.
To say that one should not care for their extended family the same as they would for their close relatives is foolish at best and hateful at worst.
Our current society is one with low levels of racial solidarity and extremely high levels of propping up the weak. In a society with significant solidarity people would know when they are being a detriment to those around them. Which happens in many cultures with extreme environments like arctic or desert where they cannot tolerate somebody taking up resources and not contributing to their people.
I believe this will be the case as well. A guaranteed income isn't always bad, Alaska has something like that with oil money, but with the people currently in power it will be nothing good.
Anything people have in cash savings will be heavily devalued, and most people will be entirely reliant on the government as an income source. This would likely come into play with a new "digital currency" as well, which wouldn't have some of the benefits that current cryptocurrencies have.
Very good post. I believe that Trump was first elected on actual populism and the establishment did not want to accept any change. It's very telling that Trump went from "Drain the swamp" by bringing in many outsiders like Bannon, to suddenly getting rid of them and bringing back many swamp creatures. It feels like during his first 2 years he ended up making some kind of backroom deal to stop pushing things in the way he was. In exchange for what I have no idea.
Trump can come out and stand up for white people, or else he is supporting the current regime. Unless he properly addresses the election fraud and the legal failure to have anything at all happen, there is no reason for anybody to support him in any way.
I hope he comes out with a very sanitized campaign and people reject him. Which will leave a political and social vacuum for figures better aligned with the will of the majority of people.
Yeah it's something that many people will try to dismiss in one way or another. It's probably because they have only been taught to think of "nature vs nurture" when the basis of "nurture" is founded in biology as well. Unless they're talking about being nurtured by rocks and inorganic matter.
As shown by the kinds of virtue signaling that has been happening lately, they don't only care about profits. The stonetoss "Burgers?" comic is a perfect distillation of that.
The people who control the banks and government have essentially unlimited funds. Money can accomplish a lot, but there is a limit. That's why you get into things like blackmail and illegal goods to tempt and control people who can't just be won over with money.
It will always come back to race because your brain is biological. The kind of brain you have is determined or at least heavily influenced by your parents and their lineage. This means culture and ultimately "class" are expressions of an underlying biology.
I never said there was any grand plan linking everything, just that it's a common tactic that has been used heavily since at least the 1960's. It's only in recent years with the internet that actual truth has been able to leak through the cracks and reach many people.
Also there can definitely be groups that want to use this to push something specific. The government does not want people to heavily doubt them. Atheists do not want people to believe in religion. And with GamerGate (and other journalism) it's pretty clear that private mailing lists dictate what is acceptable to publish and what narratives should be supported.
It's the same formula that's been used elsewhere. Use something like aliens and flat earth to conflate with people who are suspicious of the FBI and CIA. Use the westboro baptist church and creationists to conflate with all christians. The same was used against GamerGate by painting everybody as "bigoted trolls who just harass women" ignoring anybody with legitimate concerns.
Meanwhile they try to "fact check" every single instance which goes against their narratives saying "Oh no that was caused by something totally different!" and brush it under the rug.
They won't considering who owns the banks and investor capital. And even when the banks fail we know the government just bails them out. There's a reason that some companies can go over a decade without any actual profit as long as it has a monopoly position and can influence a lot of people.
The French Revolution tends to be known as the first major event in recent history which "inverted" things and it kept growing from there.
The average person is easily convinced. People are much worse at critical thinking and self-doubt than they would like to admit. This is why democracy ends up as "Rule by people who can most influence the masses" and why modern politics is basically just theater.
And I would recommend watching Asha Logos Subverted History series which goes over some parts of history that academia does not want to touch.
One large issue I can see (and many people here seem unaware of as well) is conflating race only with skin color. Race is a broad word talking about someone's overall biological ancestry, not just their physical appearance. With the biggest difference being internal organs, especially the brain.
You could upload on LBRY/Odysee, or have your youtube videos automatically mirror there if your channel is approved I think.