Some degree of central effort is needed. People need to rally behind individuals with certain values in mind. One main problem of "the right" is that it's all spread out rural with no actual communications network outside of local talk.
I don't think people like who you have named accomplish that, which is why I don't watch them. Their goal is to have a discussion and reach things through "reasonable terms" which will never happen, it will only be slow capitulation.
If everybody is isolated and not pointed in the same direction then no great efforts can be accomplished. The problem is getting a rallying figure that will actually be able to do something meaningful about the issues we currently face.
Except when his base was actively engaged and doing damage to the establishment, the fucking CIA engaged the q anon bullshit to keep them docile. Anyone who sees circumstances changing without buckets of blood is deluding themselves.
Trump was a central figure, but he did not oppose the right issues. He thought that economy was more important than other areas, which is incorrect to some degree. He also did not come out in full support or opposition to q-anon and during his term almost entirely neglected rural white americans which were the reason he was elected at all.
Not to say that he was bad. He shows many positives towards rallying people and other caveats to consider. I think he did deserve a 2nd term and that the election was stolen from him, but he will not be the figure to give the public a call to action.
I keep seeing this data suggesting that Trump lost ground with white men, and I just don't see how it's possible. White men would not abandon Trump to vote for a political party that actively hates them. By all accounts, we had more total votes last election than in we did in 2016, so we can safely say that discouraged white voters didn't stay home. So what really happened?
I'll tell you what happened: voting machines flipped votes in primarily deep red counties because no one bothers to audit blowouts, and the demographics of these counties resulted in this strategy disproportionately flipping white male votes. That's why Trump was mysteriously down from 2016 in many deep red counties while the local ticket was way up, a phenomenon that goes directly against all established election norms.
We also saw some small counties reverse their elections after hand recounts revealed massive irregularities in favor of the Democrat candidate. I'm guessing the algorithm grabbed a few counties it wasn't supposed to and flipped too many votes. The local audits caught these "mistakes" immediately.
The new democrat government is refusing legitimate state-level audits not because they cheated in purple counties but because votes were stolen in deep red counties.
Some degree of central effort is needed. People need to rally behind individuals with certain values in mind. One main problem of "the right" is that it's all spread out rural with no actual communications network outside of local talk.
I don't think people like who you have named accomplish that, which is why I don't watch them. Their goal is to have a discussion and reach things through "reasonable terms" which will never happen, it will only be slow capitulation.
If everybody is isolated and not pointed in the same direction then no great efforts can be accomplished. The problem is getting a rallying figure that will actually be able to do something meaningful about the issues we currently face.
Trump though.
Except when his base was actively engaged and doing damage to the establishment, the fucking CIA engaged the q anon bullshit to keep them docile. Anyone who sees circumstances changing without buckets of blood is deluding themselves.
Trump was a central figure, but he did not oppose the right issues. He thought that economy was more important than other areas, which is incorrect to some degree. He also did not come out in full support or opposition to q-anon and during his term almost entirely neglected rural white americans which were the reason he was elected at all.
Not to say that he was bad. He shows many positives towards rallying people and other caveats to consider. I think he did deserve a 2nd term and that the election was stolen from him, but he will not be the figure to give the public a call to action.
I keep seeing this data suggesting that Trump lost ground with white men, and I just don't see how it's possible. White men would not abandon Trump to vote for a political party that actively hates them. By all accounts, we had more total votes last election than in we did in 2016, so we can safely say that discouraged white voters didn't stay home. So what really happened?
I'll tell you what happened: voting machines flipped votes in primarily deep red counties because no one bothers to audit blowouts, and the demographics of these counties resulted in this strategy disproportionately flipping white male votes. That's why Trump was mysteriously down from 2016 in many deep red counties while the local ticket was way up, a phenomenon that goes directly against all established election norms.
We also saw some small counties reverse their elections after hand recounts revealed massive irregularities in favor of the Democrat candidate. I'm guessing the algorithm grabbed a few counties it wasn't supposed to and flipped too many votes. The local audits caught these "mistakes" immediately.
The new democrat government is refusing legitimate state-level audits not because they cheated in purple counties but because votes were stolen in deep red counties.