Autistic men and autistic women of the world, wherever you are, you are wrongly maligned, stigmatized, persecuted at every turn by a world that needs you but completely fails to understand you. It's not your fault. No one says what they mean anymore. It's not worth understanding what they're saying anyway.
Luckily for you, another group of similarly marginalized individuals has blazed a trail not only to tolerance but onwards to veneration. We don't have much time. Listen closely: This podcast comes out March 1st. The 20th annual world congress of psychiatry takes place from March 10th to the 13th. You need to find your way into any now virtual seminars or meetings about autism and you need to protest as loudly as humanly possible. I understand that some of you are screamers so this should be easy.
You need to keep doing this at every gathering of psychiatrists until they are so completely fed up with your bullshit that they take you out of the DSM. Plead like goats. Moan like sirens. Scream like the eagles you know you are. Once that happens, we'll move on to step 2 in a later episode.
We went from "I'm against gay marriage" to "As long as it doesn't affect me, its okay! Come here kids, get your hormone blockers!". All this horrid degeneracy, we deserve to collapse.
This dude is is still undermining Leftist complaints. This isn't the only fairly right-wing transperson that helps to subvert the anti-gender movement and Trans-Trenderism.
Accelerationism DOES work but you can't be retarded about it.
Just blindly throwing your chips in with the commies and elites ends with you in a gulag or dead.
The correct method is to build heavy discontent in the populous and attack their bread and circus. That's why Gamergate was effective, and why the current GME campaign could become highly successful.
It will work eventually. Otherwise, you are saying that progressivism/socialism/communism is a sustainable solution.
Maybe we don't see the collapse in our lifetime but it will come. If the only way to beat this thing is to go through it, better we suffer it than our children and grandchildren.
The truth: nearly all past bigotry was justified, or at least had a logical component, even if it was unconscious. Men rejected female power because they knew what would happen if females got power. Men were racist because they knew what would happen in mixed race societies. Men were homophobic because they knew what would happen if degeneracy was allowed through the door. While historically most reactions to these taboos was purely based on instinct and not reason, we're seeing clearly in the modern world why men reacted instinctively towards these things. Sadly somewhere along the way our biological reactions were subverted, and we were told that they were wrong, and that we must embrace the deviants.
It wasn't instinct. There have been countless documented cases of women screwing up societies. Everything from ancient Egypt, to the Ottoman empire, and now we get to see it with our own eyes in this day and age. Faggotry is also an easy one. Faggots have no limit on group sex and spread disease like plague rats, in a society that didn't have modern medicine, the faggots would be a ticking time bomb. It wouldn't take people long to figure out that all the sickness in the city/town comes from the fags. Lastly, racism is a thing because humans have tried on countless times to "come together" over the ages and it always failed, that's why we have ancient stories like the tower of babel, people knew diversity was shit over 4000 years ago.
There have been countless documented cases of women screwing up societies. Everything from ancient Egypt, to the Ottoman empire, and now we get to see it with our own eyes in this day and age.
Can you elaborate more on this? Or at least point me towards some sources because I doubt official history books will say outright that women are responsible for fall of civilizations.
Read this paper. It's 26 pages and outlines the history of various empires. You can skip ahead and look at what happens with mass immigration, women taking power in society, etc. What we're seeing today is the end of the west, just as it's happened many times throughout history to many empires.
While historically most reactions to these taboos was purely based on instinct and not reason
I wish I could find this via google right now, but there's ancient writings from greece or rome, possibly even a play, speculating and ridiculing what would happen if women were allowed to run civilization.
It's exactly what you'd expect - single mothers on welfare, nanny-state shit, foreign men welcomed in with open arms.
Even the idea that this 'instinct' and 'not reason' is false. Any man who has figured out roughly what motivates women can figure out what a woman-run government will look like, and any man who has figured out what keeps a society functioning on an inter-generational time scale can figure out that a woman-run government is a road to slow death.
While historically most reactions to these taboos was purely based on instinct and not reason
Instinct and gut feeling is just subconscious data processing and analysis. That feeling of unease didn't come from nowhere, it came from your brain processing all available data and sending you a survival impulse.
It's my natural instinct to be prejudiced against useless, weak, resentful, failures that depend on racialism to excuse their own failures in life. Especially if you're stupid enough to talk shit about my friends because your ideology of victimhood and resentment.
But I suppose your right. Let's rely on my own prejudices about people like you. You and your kind belong on the helicopter with the rest of the divisive, anti-American, scum.
Yeah, I asked for it because I got accused of being a Jew for opposing a idiot racist running his mouth.
I find it fucking hilarious that the default setting of the white identitarian movement is always to accuse people of being Jews the moment you get any push back.
It's natural to look out for your family and care for their well being. When villages and cities were populated only by a single people group that includes them as an extended family in what Aristotle called philia.
To say that one should not care for their extended family the same as they would for their close relatives is foolish at best and hateful at worst.
Our current society is one with low levels of racial solidarity and extremely high levels of propping up the weak. In a society with significant solidarity people would know when they are being a detriment to those around them. Which happens in many cultures with extreme environments like arctic or desert where they cannot tolerate somebody taking up resources and not contributing to their people.
When villages and cities were populated only by a single people group that includes them as an extended family in what Aristotle called philia.
Cities were never populated in that way. That's simply the nature of cities. The density grantees division. No one """"family"""" can populate a city of 10,000. Families that large are simply clans, not families, and not races, and they stop functioning as genuine families, and function more along the lines of a clan higherarchy with dynastic struggles within them.
To this day, Arab families still have these same issues. Everyone exists within some larger extended dynastic family order with family members and arranged marriages being created to serve the purpose of the sole patriarch. Failure to serve the family by virtue of doing the bidding of patriarch can mean death.
Broadening the family to include not only clan, not only the ethnic group, but the race, is absurd.
The stupidity of racial identitarians in black communities calling people brother, sister, or cousin is utterly nonsensical. Especially when a black American is raging about how much he hates black Africans.
A race is not a family, not even remotely. It's a broader abstraction than even an ethnic group or a clan. Within that, a race of people should never be governed like a family because it means that an entire race of people is subjugated like a clan structure. Dynastic totalitarianism for a race is not only fucking crazy, but utterly ludicrous to even consider implementing.
What ends up actually happening is a bunch of Progressive Racialists demanding totalitarian control and claiming that these racial identities are effectively "political identities", so that they can be broad enough to adopt anyone stupid enough to believe in them. This is why the Europeans were calling Italians "politically black", and why Democrats were already considering Hispanic to be a political affiliation.
low levels of racial solidary
Good. We're not brothers. I have a real family.
extremely high levels propping up the weak
Yes, that's the point.
they cannot tolerate somebody taking up resources and not contributing to their people.
Sounded to me like Trump was campaigning on making America better, regardless of what the establishment thought, rather than just complaining that the establishment should treat us better.
Not a fan. It's also why I'm not a fan of Palestine either. That whole region is a giant shithole of tribalism and sectarianism. That being said, Arabs living in Israel seem to be genuinely better off living in a Jewish racial-state rather than an Arab Psuedo-Socialist one. That being said, it's not like the Arab states are any less racist than Israel. "The Jews must somehow be to blame" is basically a fucking competitive sport. The Arab Nations took over a UN "anti-racism" conference and spent the entire time ranting about Jews.
To me, that tells me just how completely retarded Socialism really is.
That all being said, your point is still correct. Any Zionist crying about how he has to discriminate against others to protect his race is just as much of a failure as any other racist trash. Frankly, they should ban the right-of-return. Honestly, it keep most of the SJW Jews out of Israel anyway since many of them seem to occupy Europe and America.
Because people aren't calling out Zionists. They're calling out JEWS.
Just all Jews.
Disagreement = Judaism = Zionism = Bolshevism, and there are never any differences. It's utterly devoid of fucking reason.
Yes. Rampant, inane, incompetence makes me mad, along with racial collectivism.
Even when I point out internal conflicts between Jews, the only answer I get from some people is a claim that "Well, that proves that they grant each-other more leeway than they would any of us whites!"
It's just racist motivated reasoning. It's nothing else. There's no substance to any of it. It's just hatred of Jews, mixed with black-pilling, motivated reasoning, and a fetish that some jackboot will save you.
Meanwhile, yes, Israel tries to influence the US government. So does Saudi Arabia, China, Germany, Canada, Japan, Mexico, India, and probably Nigeria in some way.
And while, frankly, the infiltration of our institutions by Communist Chinese is absolutely a major national security threat, the only thing anyone on the alt-right has to say is that China is run by Jews, because Communism is Jewish, therefore the Chinese Communist threat is really just a Jewish threat.
It's not just rent-free, it's being a useful idiot to people that can pull a racist's strings.
Telling degenerates they could still be valid and valuable human beings was the well-intentioned first step on the road to hell we're currently barreling down at break-neck speeds.
It is the action of degeneracy, and the public setting of that action, intentionally taken as an exercise in social power, that turned these animals into the plague they are today.
He don't miss.
http://stonetoss.com/comic/mud-slinging/
Autistic men and autistic women of the world, wherever you are, you are wrongly maligned, stigmatized, persecuted at every turn by a world that needs you but completely fails to understand you. It's not your fault. No one says what they mean anymore. It's not worth understanding what they're saying anyway.
Luckily for you, another group of similarly marginalized individuals has blazed a trail not only to tolerance but onwards to veneration. We don't have much time. Listen closely: This podcast comes out March 1st. The 20th annual world congress of psychiatry takes place from March 10th to the 13th. You need to find your way into any now virtual seminars or meetings about autism and you need to protest as loudly as humanly possible. I understand that some of you are screamers so this should be easy.
You need to keep doing this at every gathering of psychiatrists until they are so completely fed up with your bullshit that they take you out of the DSM. Plead like goats. Moan like sirens. Scream like the eagles you know you are. Once that happens, we'll move on to step 2 in a later episode.
We went from "I'm against gay marriage" to "As long as it doesn't affect me, its okay! Come here kids, get your hormone blockers!". All this horrid degeneracy, we deserve to collapse.
As long as they don't expect me to think of them as a real woman, and arent' trying to push their degeneracy on kids, I don't care what they do.
Kind of ridiculous to have an open, autogynephlic pervert in office, though.
This is perfectly fine.
This dude is is still undermining Leftist complaints. This isn't the only fairly right-wing transperson that helps to subvert the anti-gender movement and Trans-Trenderism.
no, it isn't.
enough of these mental patients.
Accelerationism won't work.
If people didn't wake up through the Chinavirus bullshit for a year and a stolen election, nothing will wake them up.
I gotta hard disagree with that.
Accelerationism DOES work but you can't be retarded about it.
Just blindly throwing your chips in with the commies and elites ends with you in a gulag or dead.
The correct method is to build heavy discontent in the populous and attack their bread and circus. That's why Gamergate was effective, and why the current GME campaign could become highly successful.
It will work eventually. Otherwise, you are saying that progressivism/socialism/communism is a sustainable solution.
Maybe we don't see the collapse in our lifetime but it will come. If the only way to beat this thing is to go through it, better we suffer it than our children and grandchildren.
How many years did it take for the Soviet Union to fall?
They had the U.S. fighting against them for decades. We won't even have that going for us.
I don't have kids and don't plan on having kids.
I rather not purposely cause the world to become an even worse hell than it is already.
I won't be jumping on the foolish train of accelerationism.
They also had the US funding them under the table.
lol it’s always “MUH ACCERLATION” and then you faggots are the first to whine about it whenever ANYTHING happens.
You're an utter retard. They are completely different people.
The truth: nearly all past bigotry was justified, or at least had a logical component, even if it was unconscious. Men rejected female power because they knew what would happen if females got power. Men were racist because they knew what would happen in mixed race societies. Men were homophobic because they knew what would happen if degeneracy was allowed through the door. While historically most reactions to these taboos was purely based on instinct and not reason, we're seeing clearly in the modern world why men reacted instinctively towards these things. Sadly somewhere along the way our biological reactions were subverted, and we were told that they were wrong, and that we must embrace the deviants.
It wasn't instinct. There have been countless documented cases of women screwing up societies. Everything from ancient Egypt, to the Ottoman empire, and now we get to see it with our own eyes in this day and age. Faggotry is also an easy one. Faggots have no limit on group sex and spread disease like plague rats, in a society that didn't have modern medicine, the faggots would be a ticking time bomb. It wouldn't take people long to figure out that all the sickness in the city/town comes from the fags. Lastly, racism is a thing because humans have tried on countless times to "come together" over the ages and it always failed, that's why we have ancient stories like the tower of babel, people knew diversity was shit over 4000 years ago.
Can you elaborate more on this? Or at least point me towards some sources because I doubt official history books will say outright that women are responsible for fall of civilizations.
Read this paper. It's 26 pages and outlines the history of various empires. You can skip ahead and look at what happens with mass immigration, women taking power in society, etc. What we're seeing today is the end of the west, just as it's happened many times throughout history to many empires.
Hey, I have actually seen a screenshot of from this book elsewhere. It was about an increase in female influence in society is detrimental.
Thanks for the link.
I wish I could find this via google right now, but there's ancient writings from greece or rome, possibly even a play, speculating and ridiculing what would happen if women were allowed to run civilization.
It's exactly what you'd expect - single mothers on welfare, nanny-state shit, foreign men welcomed in with open arms.
Even the idea that this 'instinct' and 'not reason' is false. Any man who has figured out roughly what motivates women can figure out what a woman-run government will look like, and any man who has figured out what keeps a society functioning on an inter-generational time scale can figure out that a woman-run government is a road to slow death.
The play is "The Assembly women" by Aristophanes.
Instinct and gut feeling is just subconscious data processing and analysis. That feeling of unease didn't come from nowhere, it came from your brain processing all available data and sending you a survival impulse.
It's my natural instinct to be prejudiced against useless, weak, resentful, failures that depend on racialism to excuse their own failures in life. Especially if you're stupid enough to talk shit about my friends because your ideology of victimhood and resentment.
But I suppose your right. Let's rely on my own prejudices about people like you. You and your kind belong on the helicopter with the rest of the divisive, anti-American, scum.
We get it already.
I get it already.
Care to explain the origin of your flair on reddit?
Yeah, I asked for it because I got accused of being a Jew for opposing a idiot racist running his mouth.
I find it fucking hilarious that the default setting of the white identitarian movement is always to accuse people of being Jews the moment you get any push back.
It is the epitome of "rent free".
It's natural to look out for your family and care for their well being. When villages and cities were populated only by a single people group that includes them as an extended family in what Aristotle called philia.
To say that one should not care for their extended family the same as they would for their close relatives is foolish at best and hateful at worst.
Our current society is one with low levels of racial solidarity and extremely high levels of propping up the weak. In a society with significant solidarity people would know when they are being a detriment to those around them. Which happens in many cultures with extreme environments like arctic or desert where they cannot tolerate somebody taking up resources and not contributing to their people.
Cities were never populated in that way. That's simply the nature of cities. The density grantees division. No one """"family"""" can populate a city of 10,000. Families that large are simply clans, not families, and not races, and they stop functioning as genuine families, and function more along the lines of a clan higherarchy with dynastic struggles within them.
To this day, Arab families still have these same issues. Everyone exists within some larger extended dynastic family order with family members and arranged marriages being created to serve the purpose of the sole patriarch. Failure to serve the family by virtue of doing the bidding of patriarch can mean death.
Broadening the family to include not only clan, not only the ethnic group, but the race, is absurd.
The stupidity of racial identitarians in black communities calling people brother, sister, or cousin is utterly nonsensical. Especially when a black American is raging about how much he hates black Africans.
A race is not a family, not even remotely. It's a broader abstraction than even an ethnic group or a clan. Within that, a race of people should never be governed like a family because it means that an entire race of people is subjugated like a clan structure. Dynastic totalitarianism for a race is not only fucking crazy, but utterly ludicrous to even consider implementing.
What ends up actually happening is a bunch of Progressive Racialists demanding totalitarian control and claiming that these racial identities are effectively "political identities", so that they can be broad enough to adopt anyone stupid enough to believe in them. This is why the Europeans were calling Italians "politically black", and why Democrats were already considering Hispanic to be a political affiliation.
Good. We're not brothers. I have a real family.
Yes, that's the point.
Agreed. Pinkos & racialists to the helicopters.
Not even sure what you're trying to aim at here. It doesn't look like it relates to anything I said.
Sounded to me like Trump was campaigning on making America better, regardless of what the establishment thought, rather than just complaining that the establishment should treat us better.
Affirmative stances are always better received.
Not a fan. It's also why I'm not a fan of Palestine either. That whole region is a giant shithole of tribalism and sectarianism. That being said, Arabs living in Israel seem to be genuinely better off living in a Jewish racial-state rather than an Arab Psuedo-Socialist one. That being said, it's not like the Arab states are any less racist than Israel. "The Jews must somehow be to blame" is basically a fucking competitive sport. The Arab Nations took over a UN "anti-racism" conference and spent the entire time ranting about Jews.
To me, that tells me just how completely retarded Socialism really is.
That all being said, your point is still correct. Any Zionist crying about how he has to discriminate against others to protect his race is just as much of a failure as any other racist trash. Frankly, they should ban the right-of-return. Honestly, it keep most of the SJW Jews out of Israel anyway since many of them seem to occupy Europe and America.
Because people aren't calling out Zionists. They're calling out JEWS.
Just all Jews.
Disagreement = Judaism = Zionism = Bolshevism, and there are never any differences. It's utterly devoid of fucking reason.
Yes. Rampant, inane, incompetence makes me mad, along with racial collectivism.
Even when I point out internal conflicts between Jews, the only answer I get from some people is a claim that "Well, that proves that they grant each-other more leeway than they would any of us whites!"
It's just racist motivated reasoning. It's nothing else. There's no substance to any of it. It's just hatred of Jews, mixed with black-pilling, motivated reasoning, and a fetish that some jackboot will save you.
Meanwhile, yes, Israel tries to influence the US government. So does Saudi Arabia, China, Germany, Canada, Japan, Mexico, India, and probably Nigeria in some way.
And while, frankly, the infiltration of our institutions by Communist Chinese is absolutely a major national security threat, the only thing anyone on the alt-right has to say is that China is run by Jews, because Communism is Jewish, therefore the Chinese Communist threat is really just a Jewish threat.
It's not just rent-free, it's being a useful idiot to people that can pull a racist's strings.
Comment Removed - Rule 2
You can remove it, but you can't make it false.
Telling degenerates they could still be valid and valuable human beings was the well-intentioned first step on the road to hell we're currently barreling down at break-neck speeds.
There's a big difference between "they could still be valid and valuable human beings" and attacking them with a gorilla.
There's no telling how tolerant the hypothetical gorilla might be.
Come on, dawg.
It is the action of degeneracy, and the public setting of that action, intentionally taken as an exercise in social power, that turned these animals into the plague they are today.