good lad
antifeminist
correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought feminism was all about empowering women to make their own choices. how is someone promoting a traditional lifestyle anti-feminist then?
(sarcastic rhetorical question. feminism has always been about power)
sounds like a typical MRE. a cheap, compact, utilitarian way to feed someone quickly.
tomboys are females that act masculine, who know and accept that they are females and have no problem with it. tomboys are not troons, and tomboys are not men, so anyone who says you're gay for liking a tomboy is a retard.
good lad
but he did post the link. read the comments faggot!
if a woman doesn't approve of my hobbies, she is not marriage material. just like if a woman is into shit that I don't approve of, she is not for me. simple as.
there are no bad tactics, only bad targets.
don't become one of these faggots
good lad
it's a protection racket
daily wire are the Christian conservative right (EDIT: more accurately: religious right) of the 90s and 2000s. is anyone really surprised by this?
if your kid is liable to commit a murder, you've got other issues on your hands. a good parent who raised their kids right has nothing to worry about.
parents are responsible for their children. if the parent decided to let their kid be raised by an iPad instead of raising them themselves, that's their own problem. if someone dies because of their poor parenting, you can be sure as shit they share in the responsibility.
or do you think the parents of those dipshit teens pointing guns at the camera for their profile pics and dressing like gangsters are blameless?
who is this faggot and why do we care?
I feel like the real world is actually healing, and it's unironically thanks to VR chat. most of the degenerates are deciding to live in The Matrix rather than the real world, and honestly the real world is better for it.
the only thing in the real world I've noticed has gotten way worse is drugs and homelessness. everyone who can't afford a VR headset are instead frying their brains on cartel cocktails.
minors are not legal adults, and do not share the same rights as legal adults. there is always someone responsible for a minor. if a minor commits a murder using tools that the adult willingly gave them, the adult should have some responsibility in that.
this is not to take responsibility away from the minor. At the end of the day, they are responsible for their actions as well and should be disciplined accordingly.
the question would then become: did the parents give the kid full access to the safe? if not, then the kid stole the gun and I agree the parents should not be charged.
you should read the comment you're replying to in its entirety before you type.
skeet shooting and target shooting are not crimes, and neither is possession of a weapon if you meet the minimum age requirement or are under supervision of a legal adult.
murder is a crime.
the parent giving a minor a weapon means that parent trusts that minor to be responsible with that weapon. no parent should ever hand their kids a gun if the parent is not absolutely sure the kid knows the basics of shooting safety, and has the minimum level of integrity to not commit a murder with it. (unless of course the miner is receiving instruction in the responsible handling of guns)
nevertheless it should be.
Yes, so long as they are responsible for the kid. If a kid is not trustworthy with adult tools, don't fucking trust them with adult tools!
Also, the parent is not a scapegoat for the minor. The minor should have the full weight of the law thrown at them. However, the parents are not blameless either and should be held accountable.
this will be unpopular here, but I actually agree with this sentence. handing a minor a weapon, and then that minor committing a murder with that weapon, should absolutely be a manslaughter charge. this should apply universally.
after the Matrix, the first Pirates of the Caribbean, and the Lord of the Rings trilogy, movies with know nothing but slow decline with very rare exceptions.
reminder that the tools exist to keep children off of adult websites without requiring an ID everywhere. destroying anonymity on the internet is not the solution.
tik tok itself is the excuse being used to push this legislation. it has little to do with the app itself.
the story was posted elsewhere, were they being arrested just for being racist or were they being arrested for making threats? the former's obviously bullshit, but the ladder has precedent.