You know, I like this guy. I haven't watched much of what he's played in, because it's clear he's been given a lot of horrible roles, but I still haven't forgotten the 2020 Golden Globes award ceremony. When Ricky Gervais was making Epstein jokes, there were people like Tom Hanks who were clearly extremely uncomfortable, looking around at others to see if he was allowed to laugh. But Adam Driver here, on the other hand, just openly smiled and laughed, without a care in the world. He clearly had nothing to hide, unlike a lot of other people who were there.
From everything I've seen, he just seems like a great guy in real life.
In Ocarina of Time, she wasn't as shapely as in Melee, though. It helped the surprise reveal, although it might have just been related to limitations of the N64. Also, in-game characters called Sheik "he", like princess Ruto, even if that was obviously only to support Zelda's disguise while she was hiding from Ganon.
But troons will latch on to any justification to "claim" a character as one of their own, in their endless narcissistic quest to validate their delusions, so I really wouldn't be surprised if they attempted it here too.
Free speech. I can say whatever the fuck I want about whoever I want, as long as it's not a direct call to violence. There is no justification whatsoever why Jews alone should get a special privilege that prevents any criticism of their actions.
At that point, they might be low enough that the landing in the water won't be fatal. I would have to check how high the bridge is.
Another option might be tall barbed wire fencing on the edges of the bridge. Still wouldn't be foolproof against someone obstinate enough who is willing to suicide himself while wearing thick padded clothes and mittens, but it'd still make it difficult enough to dissuade the majority of people, at the cost of being depressingly unaesthetic.
It honestly took me until the cringy #hashtags before I realized this was a post written by a leftist. It was slightly strange to mention the love bit about matchmaker Biden, but overall, I thought "fair enough" about everything written there, applied against the left.
Either I'm the delusional one, or there is massive projection afoot from the other side.
I would suggest Cobra Kai.
I watched the first two seasons, and most of the third. Starting on the second season, they introduce this super strong girl who joins the Cobra Kai dojo, with no reasonable explanation for how she so effortlessly overpowers men. Nearly every scene with her made me roll my eyes.
Don't forget the case with the CN, one of Canada's two major railway companies. They placed hundreds of people on unpaid leave, just because they refused to inject themselves with the experimental faulty serum promoted by heavily litigated pharmaceutical companies. Last I heard, that case was still in legal limbo, even if the only thing that the workers are asking for is compensation for the time they were forced into unemployment.
From my very superficial perspective of him, he seems like a centrist, leaning left economically, but with a few policies of the Right, especially in regards to immigration and supporting local governance. He did not support having people thousands of kilometers away, in a different country, deciding on the direction of the UK, when they would not suffer any of the repercussions from their disastrous demands.
He seems like a mixed bag. Better than the vast majority of UK politicians, but far from perfect, with a lot of room for improvement. Basically, a stop-gap measure, until someone better comes along to actually plug the holes and fix their sinking vessel. Not that I actually believe there exists any such Englishman alive today.
He had a personal involvement in the creation of the covid clot shot. He has indirectly killed far more children and adults, and caused far more permanent injuries, than nearly anyone else in history.
He is not in any position to ever accuse anyone else of causing harm.
No. It exists. In fact, that was the original intent of the technology.
About 15 years ago, I worked a summer job at an air traffic control center as a software analyst. At some point, there was a golf tournament organized as a fundraiser for cancer treatment research, followed by a supper. I did not attend the tournament that happened during the day, but I did attend the supper, which was right after my work day. Of course, some of the scientists were also in attendance. Normally, I would not have been invited to their table, but I had mentioned to one of them before we sat down that I'd survived cancer twice, so they were interested in speaking with me. I asked questions about their research, and they went in great detail about it.
Their method involved creating "viruses" that were specifically designed to target specific cancer cells. (It's possible that they only called them as such because they wanted to vulgarize their explanation for my benefit.) They would take a sample of the cancer cells in the specific patient, and then design the "virus" to specifically target and consume solely that one type of cell. When I asked about what was preventing the virus from mutating and targeting different parts of the body, their reply was that it was extremely unlikely, because the lifetime of the "virus" they injected was so short that they were more likely to die out as soon as their target was eliminated, before they were able to develop the ability to target different cells. They followed it up with specifying that they were still in the experimental phase, that it was not something doctors were allowed to recommend right off the bat as a possible cancer treatment, but that it was an option that was being floated around for patients for whom every other cancer treatment method failed. After all, not every part of the body can be targeted by radiotherapy, and chemotherapy only works for so long and to a certain extent. They mentioned a few cases where patients were only given a few months to live before their method was recommended to them, who were seemingly able to make full recoveries using it, and were still under observation for any side effects, which so far had not manifested in any way.
My impression after the discussion was that it sounded extremely promising, but limited. It was something that had to be customized for every patient, and for every cancer, which would clearly greatly increase the cost. It was not a method that could be used off-the-shelf, with a generic solution for everyone. It had to be very specifically tailored for the individual, else it wouldn't work and may target other cells, similarly to what chemotherapy does.
This method is absolutely not appropriate for creating vaccines. It seemingly could be called a "cure for cancer", but it is not universal or free, by any means. I fully support research and fundraising for mRNA treatments to cancer. I strongly oppose it for any intent it is not suited for.
I hear good things about Hungary. Poland seems to have potential, too. There would be a language barrier, though.