True. Wanna know what would have curtailed their population even more?
If we'd not abandoned morality, shattered the family unit and we still had a strong and vigorous White race to keep them down.
Abortion was the moral crime that damned our civilization, and it's no coincidence that the demographic numbers in the country started on a downward trend once it was legalized by judicial fiat. God turned His face from us, and the downstream effects are plain to see.
Nevermind the statistical illiteracy required for this take anyway. 10% of 87 is more than 40% of 13. Losing entire chunks of White generations is still a grievous crime, that you cannot justify by saying oh well at least slightly more niggers died per capita.
And then there's the undeniable fact that we're the global minority. Every able-bodied White child is needed and necessary. There is no such thing as atheist white nationalism, that's just more suicidal boomer cuckery.
I don't give a rat's ass for the mud people. Take away their welfare parasitism and let the dice fall where they may. But if you're arguing for aborting White babies you're my enemy and the enemy of my race.
This. Every civilization that goes to child sacrifice dies after time. I can see this argument for abortion, but every person who argued for it forgets about the sheer amount of Anglo babies aborted. The boomers aborted something like a third of Gen X.
Another element to discuss is mandatory education.
Listen, I'm all for studying and improving one self. But I can tell you MANY kids simply don't belong in a classroom. And no, drugging them won't solve it. I'm a teacher and if I could get rid of my worse 10% of students - not even 20% or 25% - the experience would SIGNIFICANTLY improve for everyone.
Instead I'm resigning at the end of the year, and they're missing 10,000 teachers here in Quebec, and classes now have up to 42 students, and grades are lower than ever. Maths has become so easy it's basically harder to fail than pass
The same as it is in Africa, only with better outcomes and more of them surviving into adulthood. In 1950 US population was 151 million, while the total population of Africa was 227 million. In 2020 the US population was 331 million, while Africa was 1360 million. Abortion is the only reason we haven't already been Haiti'd.
Christcucks will doom us all.
Yeah, let's legalise baby murder, of our own babies, in order to keep useless populations in check.
Or, I don't know, stop giving them free money to have families?
90% of ghetto trash would either never have kids or be immediately jailed because of them if they weren't actively being subsidised by White tax dollars. Baby money is the long term financial strategy of "smart" niggers.
All we have to do is shut off the tap and the problem solves itself, including Africa.
But no, let's hear about your "kill more Black babies than White babies" plan...
I'll give a black perspective on this. The population looks less retarded. Abortion and birth control encourages the most retarded members of the population to reproduce because sex just becomes purely recreational. There's a reason for the downward spiral among both whites and blacks with the introduction of socially acceptable abortion and the sexual revolution. Black people are on average lower IQ than white people and with basically reverse eugenics happening there has been a breeding of super tards.
All this evil is caused by humans, and can be put right by humans.
Putting the blame on "demons" or the like is an attempt to shirk responsibility for our collective actions and inactions, and a subconcious attempt to push the responsibility for action onto some distant, powerful figure who you only support in the most indirect, personally uncostly ways.
You can't pray or sunday school your way out of this, any more then the commies, marxists, and jews prayed these things into being. They all worked their parts to rot society, and we must work to put it right.
So, no, it's not fucking magic monsters or sky gods or whatever. It's always, has always been, and will always be people at the heart of both the problem and the solution.
Yet, when we had an ethnically homogenous European Christian population we didn't have these problems. Remove the (White) Church and suddenly a certain (((tribe))) is spreading degeneracy all over the place. Almost like a synagogue of satan.
Are you actually an idiot, or do you realize you're agreeing with me?
Yes, the jews are part of the problem. But they're PEOPLE. HUMANS. Not magic demons or whatever. They're a solveable problem that doesn't need magic or gods or anything to fix. They are people who worked to push their interests at the expense of others, and to fix what they've rotted, we, other people, must work to push our interests against theirs.
The fucking church isn't a magic spell to solve the problem, any more then the country is magic soil that turns somalians into humans when they arrive in North America. The church is just a codified structure of enforcing social norms by threatening braindead normies with magic consequences that are always watching. It's not actually true, it's a convenient lie to keep the people who physically cannot comprehend morals and ethics past threats of violence and punishment in line. You'll get the same shit from always-on government hyper-surveillance soon enough, frustratingly enough.
There are things that are indistinguishable from demons occupying most positions of power in nearly every Western institution.
You want to quibble about semantics? As far as I'm concerned, whether they're literally demon-possessed or not, you can't look at some of these people without acknowledging that "yeah, I think the Bible talked about this."
That's a bullshit equivalence, and you know it. The bible is a book of human experience in history, dressed up with magic to try to claim legitimacy. No shit it talks about the human propensity for evil, while dressing it in the costumes of it's story.
You know what ELSE does that? Literally every other similar book. Every other religious text, every other epic, every other historical foiable, every other nursery rhyme and children's story talks about humans who commit horrible atrocities, and dresses them up as whatever. Demons, djinns, yokai, spirits, haunts, damned souls, nether spirits, vampires, werewolves, sirens, lamia, whatever, they're all the same metaphor for the same thing in different costumes.
"Demons" are no more real then any of the rest of the list, and you have to grow out of magical thinking if you want to remove the actual, real people at the heart of the issue.
You call it quibbling semantics, but this language shows the true, revealed oreferences of everyone involved, and everyone screaming "demons are here, get the jesus" isn't willing to take responsibility for the evils of humanity we have allowed to fester, and instead wants a magical savior to come and deal with the problem for them.
And what exactly do you think the "demon" is a metaphor of? The intrusive thoughts whispering in the ears of the weak willed?
Glad you bring up children's fables though, as there absolutely is a culture of ugly, evil, hook-nosed witches that live on the fringes of society seeking to harm children. As we've seen.
I don't know Romanian political history so I'd have to look into that, but my argument has been this: abortion makes leftists worse. If black women were not permitted to display such contempt for innocent life that they murder half of their own children before they're even born, they would be less likely to pass on that contempt for innocent life to the half they don't murder. And like trans "treatments," abortion creates leftists who have an investment in remaining leftists: abandoning the ideology would mean admitting they murdered their own innocent child, so it's more palatable to remain a leftist to continue pretending it was justified.
What's not accounted for here is that white people are K strategists and the brown hoards are R strategists. Browns have 10 kids and 3 abortions. White "blue hair" women are brainwashed by universities into aborting their first child and it fucks them up emotionally and physically for their whole life. The damage is far greater.
With a lot of things in life, there's the moralistic/principled stance, and then there's the pragmatic stance.
The moralistic stance is the stance that works but ONLY if we lived in a fair, just, and sane world.
The pragmatic stance however is the one that has to be adopted because it's the one that accounts for the fact that we live in clown world, and is the one that will actually produce the results you need.
The moralistic stance is important to remember because if (when) western soyciety inevitably collapses and we have a chance to rebuild it, we need to remember what exactly we have to rebuild in what way. The moralistic stance is also important to remember in order to keep your sanity. As clown world advances, and you adjust your pragmatic stance to abuse the rules that clown world sets, you still need to remember what is actually true. You need to go down the rabbit hole, but you want a rope attached to the surface so you don't get lost. But again, all that doesn't matter if you don't win the inevitable civil war first, and winning that civil war requires you to take up the pragmatic stance.
For example with something like trannies, the ideal/moralistic stance is that there are only two genders, transgender is a mental illness, etc. But again that’s only if we live in a fair and just world. The stance that actually works (pragmatic) is that you need to weaponize the trannies and the tranny movement to your advantage. For example, declare yourself a masculine presenting transgender lesbian, and if every man did this, they could Thanos snap away the last 100 years of feminism.
The reason why I say all this is that there are two broad stances on abortion. The left wants infinite abortions because women are perfect angels who can do whatever they want and it bails women out of their bad choices so they can whore it up 24/7. The right hates abortions because they are sticking to what their morals/principles are and they think that the baby is alive and has a right to live and abortion is murder.
The right is correct that abortion is murder. And that is exactly why they lose all the time. They are sticking to the moralistic stance in clown world, which again, does not work. You cannot win when you play by the rules and your enemies are cheating.
The fact is that the vast majority of abortions are done by leftists. And if you make these commies not be able to abort their kids, remember commies overwhelmingly soak up all the welfare/tax dollars and you're just paying more welfare for these kids. And then, these leftist kids will grow up to become commie foot soldiers, career criminals, etc. 90+% of the time that you will need to kill anyway, just 18+ years of welfare later. The cold hard truth is that you would save yourself a lot of time and money and lives if you just aborted those kids in the first place.
Does it suck that a lot of innocent babies will get murdered? Yes. I don't want to see little babies and fetuses get killed because their whore of a mother can't keep her legs closed. But this is not about finding the perfect solution, this is about finding the pragmatic solution that will actually fucking work.
Let the commies abort their kids because those kids would otherwise grow up to be commies themselves (as what usually happens when you have commie parents, or more specifically commie single moms).
Win the upcoming civil war and take back/rebuild the country
Get your own white women under control, kick out the illegals/jews/commies/etc., get rid of the welfare state, etc.
THEN, THEN after you fix all that shit, can you finally ban abortion.
Abortion is a symptom of a sick culture on the brink of annihilation. It's a symptom of a hedonistic culture that does not value life or the family, and has little to no moral fabric. The dream of ending abortion is impossible without a 180° change in our society. Anyone who thinks you can ever just flip the switch is fooling themselves.
Said with no evidence whatsoever. The stats say otherwise. White children are the #1 victims, above all the rest combined. Don't be fooled into thinking that this moloch ritual of systematic infanticide is in any way good for our culture. Abortion is the ruthless murder of an innocent baby, and there should be no more consideration beyond that fact. I won't discuss it any further.
What you said doesn't disagree with OP.
"Groups most likely," means a per-capita rate. That is not at odds with White people still having the highest absolute number. Never thought we'd need to explain that here.
So what? The per capita stat is inconsequential when there is a supermajority. The facts ultimately show that abortion kills more white children than nonwhites. Therefore, without it the white population would have more additional babies than the other demographics would.
Agreed. If we abandon our morals to win, we don't deserve to.
Like, if you want, all White people could fake disabilitied and become welfare leeches. Or move to other countries and subvert their governments. Or drop all standards whatsoever to "compete" with nons. Winning!
Too many people here want to beat Jews by becoming them, but that doesn't work. Jews win when we lose, but we win when we succeed; Jews losing doesn't make anything better for us other than getting rid of the excuses.
Correct. It is a bad thing.
The post I was replying to was still misunderstanding or misrepresenting the statistics.
Again, two things not contradicting one another. Stop projecting.
No, you are misrepresenting the statistics. This is exactly how stats work: you take data and exclude / include whatever it takes to make a grand statement that, while technically true, misrepresents the broader reality of the situation.
Abortion kills white people more than all others combined. Why are you framing it as somehow worse for other demographics or somehow beneficial to whites? This can only be done by intentionally excluding the fact of the supermajority.
Either you're stupid or you're doing this on purpose to subvert the paradigm.
So what is it? Have you learned something? Or are you stubbornly stupid? Or are you a malicious actor? Or are you a malicious actor who's gonna pretend to be a stubborn idiot? Which is it?
I'm not framing anything as worse. You said "the stats say otherwise." Then you provided a second statistic, which is true, but does not say otherwise.
That's it. That's all I'm correcting. You're fighting an imaginary enemy in this thread.
No it does say otherwise. The main implication of the post (pro-abortion) is based on its misrepresentation of stats via excluding the supermajority. While you could say its technically true that "groups more likely... ", the main point (being pro-abortion) and the main implication (abortion benefits whites) are contradicted and voided upon context (the supermajority) being revealed.
The context is selective to make the stats fit the desired narrative. This is obvious because the narrative falls apart upon knowing the full data of those same stats.
As usual, these evil demons always intentionally misunderstand anyone that's a Christian or to the right. I would wager only older or foolish Whites oppose eugenics for the dark horde.
The days of White Christians believing we can all be kumbaya together, as a unified group, are over. Just as every other race values its own and doesn't value the rest, Whites are finally waking to a truth that's alien to such a benevolent, charitable people.
To quote a man who altered his name to hide his heritage, as many of his kind are want to do,
"Come mothers and fathers throughout the land. And don't criticize what you can't understand. Your sons and your daughters are beyond your command. Your old road is rapidly agin'. Please get out of the new one if you can't lend your hand. For the times, they are a-changin."
This is simple: the people who oppose abortion don't do it because they believe it gives them a tactical political advantage. It's called principle, you utter cretin.
True. Wanna know what would have curtailed their population even more?
If we'd not abandoned morality, shattered the family unit and we still had a strong and vigorous White race to keep them down.
Abortion was the moral crime that damned our civilization, and it's no coincidence that the demographic numbers in the country started on a downward trend once it was legalized by judicial fiat. God turned His face from us, and the downstream effects are plain to see.
Nevermind the statistical illiteracy required for this take anyway. 10% of 87 is more than 40% of 13. Losing entire chunks of White generations is still a grievous crime, that you cannot justify by saying oh well at least slightly more niggers died per capita.
And then there's the undeniable fact that we're the global minority. Every able-bodied White child is needed and necessary. There is no such thing as atheist white nationalism, that's just more suicidal boomer cuckery.
I don't give a rat's ass for the mud people. Take away their welfare parasitism and let the dice fall where they may. But if you're arguing for aborting White babies you're my enemy and the enemy of my race.
Right on brother
This. Every civilization that goes to child sacrifice dies after time. I can see this argument for abortion, but every person who argued for it forgets about the sheer amount of Anglo babies aborted. The boomers aborted something like a third of Gen X.
Honestly, we get what we deserve.
Another element to discuss is mandatory education.
Listen, I'm all for studying and improving one self. But I can tell you MANY kids simply don't belong in a classroom. And no, drugging them won't solve it. I'm a teacher and if I could get rid of my worse 10% of students - not even 20% or 25% - the experience would SIGNIFICANTLY improve for everyone.
Instead I'm resigning at the end of the year, and they're missing 10,000 teachers here in Quebec, and classes now have up to 42 students, and grades are lower than ever. Maths has become so easy it's basically harder to fail than pass
Perfect post. Wignats fail to see the precious nature of even shitlibs. Shitlibs can convert and create more white life.
Honest question: given black people are seemingly incapable of birth control, what does their birth rate look like in an America without abortion?
The same as it is in Africa, only with better outcomes and more of them surviving into adulthood. In 1950 US population was 151 million, while the total population of Africa was 227 million. In 2020 the US population was 331 million, while Africa was 1360 million. Abortion is the only reason we haven't already been Haiti'd.
Christcucks will doom us all.
Yeah, let's legalise baby murder, of our own babies, in order to keep useless populations in check.
Or, I don't know, stop giving them free money to have families?
90% of ghetto trash would either never have kids or be immediately jailed because of them if they weren't actively being subsidised by White tax dollars. Baby money is the long term financial strategy of "smart" niggers.
All we have to do is shut off the tap and the problem solves itself, including Africa.
But no, let's hear about your "kill more Black babies than White babies" plan...
Abortion and welfare have been incentives for the most retarded black people to breed like rabbits and steadily decrease the average IQ
The black birth rate has lowered since Texas banned abortion.
I'll give a black perspective on this. The population looks less retarded. Abortion and birth control encourages the most retarded members of the population to reproduce because sex just becomes purely recreational. There's a reason for the downward spiral among both whites and blacks with the introduction of socially acceptable abortion and the sexual revolution. Black people are on average lower IQ than white people and with basically reverse eugenics happening there has been a breeding of super tards.
Black, retarded, or even feminist, they all empower Moloch.
Nah. Demons aren't real, bud.
You don’t have to believe in the devil to do his work, in fact he prefers it that way.
Imaginary voices in the dark are a sign of psychosis, not magic.
I don’t know, the voices are all telling me that you’re a faggot so they seem to be pretty spot-on so far.
Take your meds, sir.
You’re possessed by demons of homosexuality.
Take your meds, sir.
Look at the degeneracy and evil of the modern world and tell me demons aren't real again.
All this evil is caused by humans, and can be put right by humans.
Putting the blame on "demons" or the like is an attempt to shirk responsibility for our collective actions and inactions, and a subconcious attempt to push the responsibility for action onto some distant, powerful figure who you only support in the most indirect, personally uncostly ways.
You can't pray or sunday school your way out of this, any more then the commies, marxists, and jews prayed these things into being. They all worked their parts to rot society, and we must work to put it right.
So, no, it's not fucking magic monsters or sky gods or whatever. It's always, has always been, and will always be people at the heart of both the problem and the solution.
Yet, when we had an ethnically homogenous European Christian population we didn't have these problems. Remove the (White) Church and suddenly a certain (((tribe))) is spreading degeneracy all over the place. Almost like a synagogue of satan.
Are you actually an idiot, or do you realize you're agreeing with me?
Yes, the jews are part of the problem. But they're PEOPLE. HUMANS. Not magic demons or whatever. They're a solveable problem that doesn't need magic or gods or anything to fix. They are people who worked to push their interests at the expense of others, and to fix what they've rotted, we, other people, must work to push our interests against theirs.
The fucking church isn't a magic spell to solve the problem, any more then the country is magic soil that turns somalians into humans when they arrive in North America. The church is just a codified structure of enforcing social norms by threatening braindead normies with magic consequences that are always watching. It's not actually true, it's a convenient lie to keep the people who physically cannot comprehend morals and ethics past threats of violence and punishment in line. You'll get the same shit from always-on government hyper-surveillance soon enough, frustratingly enough.
You might not believe in Satan and Demons, but they definitely believe in you.
Man, it amuses me that you guys don't even see how much you sound like bots. All you ever have are canned lines.
Well, either that, or a large number of you guys are just bots, either digital or flesh-based.
There are things that are indistinguishable from demons occupying most positions of power in nearly every Western institution.
You want to quibble about semantics? As far as I'm concerned, whether they're literally demon-possessed or not, you can't look at some of these people without acknowledging that "yeah, I think the Bible talked about this."
That's a bullshit equivalence, and you know it. The bible is a book of human experience in history, dressed up with magic to try to claim legitimacy. No shit it talks about the human propensity for evil, while dressing it in the costumes of it's story.
You know what ELSE does that? Literally every other similar book. Every other religious text, every other epic, every other historical foiable, every other nursery rhyme and children's story talks about humans who commit horrible atrocities, and dresses them up as whatever. Demons, djinns, yokai, spirits, haunts, damned souls, nether spirits, vampires, werewolves, sirens, lamia, whatever, they're all the same metaphor for the same thing in different costumes.
"Demons" are no more real then any of the rest of the list, and you have to grow out of magical thinking if you want to remove the actual, real people at the heart of the issue.
You call it quibbling semantics, but this language shows the true, revealed oreferences of everyone involved, and everyone screaming "demons are here, get the jesus" isn't willing to take responsibility for the evils of humanity we have allowed to fester, and instead wants a magical savior to come and deal with the problem for them.
This is, itself, a massive part of the problem.
And what exactly do you think the "demon" is a metaphor of? The intrusive thoughts whispering in the ears of the weak willed?
Glad you bring up children's fables though, as there absolutely is a culture of ugly, evil, hook-nosed witches that live on the fringes of society seeking to harm children. As we've seen.
The obvious solution is to pursue race-based abortion policy.
Mandatory "Reproductive Medicine" for browns. As reparations.
Islam was right again inshallah
Me when I promote Satan worship as a solution to satanic problems
Fuck that. No "choice." White women make White babies. All others sterilized.
I don't know Romanian political history so I'd have to look into that, but my argument has been this: abortion makes leftists worse. If black women were not permitted to display such contempt for innocent life that they murder half of their own children before they're even born, they would be less likely to pass on that contempt for innocent life to the half they don't murder. And like trans "treatments," abortion creates leftists who have an investment in remaining leftists: abandoning the ideology would mean admitting they murdered their own innocent child, so it's more palatable to remain a leftist to continue pretending it was justified.
What's not accounted for here is that white people are K strategists and the brown hoards are R strategists. Browns have 10 kids and 3 abortions. White "blue hair" women are brainwashed by universities into aborting their first child and it fucks them up emotionally and physically for their whole life. The damage is far greater.
Giving foids any sort of "freedom" has had disastrous consequences across the board. Is this just Reddit or Tumblr now?
With a lot of things in life, there's the moralistic/principled stance, and then there's the pragmatic stance.
The moralistic stance is the stance that works but ONLY if we lived in a fair, just, and sane world.
The pragmatic stance however is the one that has to be adopted because it's the one that accounts for the fact that we live in clown world, and is the one that will actually produce the results you need.
The moralistic stance is important to remember because if (when) western soyciety inevitably collapses and we have a chance to rebuild it, we need to remember what exactly we have to rebuild in what way. The moralistic stance is also important to remember in order to keep your sanity. As clown world advances, and you adjust your pragmatic stance to abuse the rules that clown world sets, you still need to remember what is actually true. You need to go down the rabbit hole, but you want a rope attached to the surface so you don't get lost. But again, all that doesn't matter if you don't win the inevitable civil war first, and winning that civil war requires you to take up the pragmatic stance.
For example with something like trannies, the ideal/moralistic stance is that there are only two genders, transgender is a mental illness, etc. But again that’s only if we live in a fair and just world. The stance that actually works (pragmatic) is that you need to weaponize the trannies and the tranny movement to your advantage. For example, declare yourself a masculine presenting transgender lesbian, and if every man did this, they could Thanos snap away the last 100 years of feminism.
The reason why I say all this is that there are two broad stances on abortion. The left wants infinite abortions because women are perfect angels who can do whatever they want and it bails women out of their bad choices so they can whore it up 24/7. The right hates abortions because they are sticking to what their morals/principles are and they think that the baby is alive and has a right to live and abortion is murder.
The right is correct that abortion is murder. And that is exactly why they lose all the time. They are sticking to the moralistic stance in clown world, which again, does not work. You cannot win when you play by the rules and your enemies are cheating.
The fact is that the vast majority of abortions are done by leftists. And if you make these commies not be able to abort their kids, remember commies overwhelmingly soak up all the welfare/tax dollars and you're just paying more welfare for these kids. And then, these leftist kids will grow up to become commie foot soldiers, career criminals, etc. 90+% of the time that you will need to kill anyway, just 18+ years of welfare later. The cold hard truth is that you would save yourself a lot of time and money and lives if you just aborted those kids in the first place.
Does it suck that a lot of innocent babies will get murdered? Yes. I don't want to see little babies and fetuses get killed because their whore of a mother can't keep her legs closed. But this is not about finding the perfect solution, this is about finding the pragmatic solution that will actually fucking work.
Let the commies abort their kids because those kids would otherwise grow up to be commies themselves (as what usually happens when you have commie parents, or more specifically commie single moms).
Win the upcoming civil war and take back/rebuild the country
Get your own white women under control, kick out the illegals/jews/commies/etc., get rid of the welfare state, etc.
THEN, THEN after you fix all that shit, can you finally ban abortion.
Something to consider: how many frothing Leftists are getting abortions because the Right takes a moral stand against it?
Illegal immigrants get abortions? Could've fooled me
Abortion is a symptom of a sick culture on the brink of annihilation. It's a symptom of a hedonistic culture that does not value life or the family, and has little to no moral fabric. The dream of ending abortion is impossible without a 180° change in our society. Anyone who thinks you can ever just flip the switch is fooling themselves.
Why do you think I support early abortion?
I only support post-natal abortion.
I'm going to start calling my .45 "The Doctor."
''Jobless (black) youths'' ( by their own behavior ) are already periodically setting cities on fire in the USA despite abortions.
So...
They just need to be post-birth aborted.
Said with no evidence whatsoever. The stats say otherwise. White children are the #1 victims, above all the rest combined. Don't be fooled into thinking that this moloch ritual of systematic infanticide is in any way good for our culture. Abortion is the ruthless murder of an innocent baby, and there should be no more consideration beyond that fact. I won't discuss it any further.
What you said doesn't disagree with OP.
"Groups most likely," means a per-capita rate. That is not at odds with White people still having the highest absolute number. Never thought we'd need to explain that here.
So what? The per capita stat is inconsequential when there is a supermajority. The facts ultimately show that abortion kills more white children than nonwhites. Therefore, without it the white population would have more additional babies than the other demographics would.
This topic sickens me.
Innumeracy is a greater threat to civilization than any amount of illiteracy.
Agreed. If we abandon our morals to win, we don't deserve to.
Like, if you want, all White people could fake disabilitied and become welfare leeches. Or move to other countries and subvert their governments. Or drop all standards whatsoever to "compete" with nons. Winning!
Too many people here want to beat Jews by becoming them, but that doesn't work. Jews win when we lose, but we win when we succeed; Jews losing doesn't make anything better for us other than getting rid of the excuses.
Do you see that the highest number of babies murdered being White is a bad thing, despite per capita? Do you understand that we are a global minority?
Never thought I'd need to explain that here...oh, wait, I forgot: Jews.
Correct. It is a bad thing.
The post I was replying to was still misunderstanding or misrepresenting the statistics.
Again, two things not contradicting one another. Stop projecting.
No, you are misrepresenting the statistics. This is exactly how stats work: you take data and exclude / include whatever it takes to make a grand statement that, while technically true, misrepresents the broader reality of the situation.
Abortion kills white people more than all others combined. Why are you framing it as somehow worse for other demographics or somehow beneficial to whites? This can only be done by intentionally excluding the fact of the supermajority.
Either you're stupid or you're doing this on purpose to subvert the paradigm.
So what is it? Have you learned something? Or are you stubbornly stupid? Or are you a malicious actor? Or are you a malicious actor who's gonna pretend to be a stubborn idiot? Which is it?
All supporters of infanticide are Jewish to me.
I'm not framing anything as worse. You said "the stats say otherwise." Then you provided a second statistic, which is true, but does not say otherwise.
That's it. That's all I'm correcting. You're fighting an imaginary enemy in this thread.
No it does say otherwise. The main implication of the post (pro-abortion) is based on its misrepresentation of stats via excluding the supermajority. While you could say its technically true that "groups more likely... ", the main point (being pro-abortion) and the main implication (abortion benefits whites) are contradicted and voided upon context (the supermajority) being revealed.
The context is selective to make the stats fit the desired narrative. This is obvious because the narrative falls apart upon knowing the full data of those same stats.
I would posit that the vast majority of kids born to blue haired feminists would have become christian conservatives by adulthood.
Or 41% because their mom cut their dick off.
Cope. One look at Hollywood and all their kids shows the exact opposite
Gen Z is more conservative than boomers.
Yes, let's allow baby murder because it'll boost GDP...
I'm anti-choice, not anti-sterilizing muds.
As usual, these evil demons always intentionally misunderstand anyone that's a Christian or to the right. I would wager only older or foolish Whites oppose eugenics for the dark horde.
The days of White Christians believing we can all be kumbaya together, as a unified group, are over. Just as every other race values its own and doesn't value the rest, Whites are finally waking to a truth that's alien to such a benevolent, charitable people.
To quote a man who altered his name to hide his heritage, as many of his kind are want to do,
"Come mothers and fathers throughout the land. And don't criticize what you can't understand. Your sons and your daughters are beyond your command. Your old road is rapidly agin'. Please get out of the new one if you can't lend your hand. For the times, they are a-changin."
Wilfred Reilly is mostly a retard.
This is simple: the people who oppose abortion don't do it because they believe it gives them a tactical political advantage. It's called principle, you utter cretin.
How's being principled working out for you guys?
"Feminist" is not a genetic attribute.
Exactly why I am pro abortion.