What you said doesn't disagree with OP.
"Groups most likely," means a per-capita rate. That is not at odds with White people still having the highest absolute number. Never thought we'd need to explain that here.
So what? The per capita stat is inconsequential when there is a supermajority. The facts ultimately show that abortion kills more white children than nonwhites. Therefore, without it the white population would have more additional babies than the other demographics would.
Agreed. If we abandon our morals to win, we don't deserve to.
Like, if you want, all White people could fake disabilitied and become welfare leeches. Or move to other countries and subvert their governments. Or drop all standards whatsoever to "compete" with nons. Winning!
Too many people here want to beat Jews by becoming them, but that doesn't work. Jews win when we lose, but we win when we succeed; Jews losing doesn't make anything better for us other than getting rid of the excuses.
Correct. It is a bad thing.
The post I was replying to was still misunderstanding or misrepresenting the statistics.
Again, two things not contradicting one another. Stop projecting.
No, you are misrepresenting the statistics. This is exactly how stats work: you take data and exclude / include whatever it takes to make a grand statement that, while technically true, misrepresents the broader reality of the situation.
Abortion kills white people more than all others combined. Why are you framing it as somehow worse for other demographics or somehow beneficial to whites? This can only be done by intentionally excluding the fact of the supermajority.
Either you're stupid or you're doing this on purpose to subvert the paradigm.
So what is it? Have you learned something? Or are you stubbornly stupid? Or are you a malicious actor? Or are you a malicious actor who's gonna pretend to be a stubborn idiot? Which is it?
I'm not framing anything as worse. You said "the stats say otherwise." Then you provided a second statistic, which is true, but does not say otherwise.
That's it. That's all I'm correcting. You're fighting an imaginary enemy in this thread.
What you said doesn't disagree with OP.
"Groups most likely," means a per-capita rate. That is not at odds with White people still having the highest absolute number. Never thought we'd need to explain that here.
So what? The per capita stat is inconsequential when there is a supermajority. The facts ultimately show that abortion kills more white children than nonwhites. Therefore, without it the white population would have more additional babies than the other demographics would.
This topic sickens me.
Innumeracy is a greater threat to civilization than any amount of illiteracy.
Agreed. If we abandon our morals to win, we don't deserve to.
Like, if you want, all White people could fake disabilitied and become welfare leeches. Or move to other countries and subvert their governments. Or drop all standards whatsoever to "compete" with nons. Winning!
Too many people here want to beat Jews by becoming them, but that doesn't work. Jews win when we lose, but we win when we succeed; Jews losing doesn't make anything better for us other than getting rid of the excuses.
Do you see that the highest number of babies murdered being White is a bad thing, despite per capita? Do you understand that we are a global minority?
Never thought I'd need to explain that here...oh, wait, I forgot: Jews.
Correct. It is a bad thing.
The post I was replying to was still misunderstanding or misrepresenting the statistics.
Again, two things not contradicting one another. Stop projecting.
No, you are misrepresenting the statistics. This is exactly how stats work: you take data and exclude / include whatever it takes to make a grand statement that, while technically true, misrepresents the broader reality of the situation.
Abortion kills white people more than all others combined. Why are you framing it as somehow worse for other demographics or somehow beneficial to whites? This can only be done by intentionally excluding the fact of the supermajority.
Either you're stupid or you're doing this on purpose to subvert the paradigm.
So what is it? Have you learned something? Or are you stubbornly stupid? Or are you a malicious actor? Or are you a malicious actor who's gonna pretend to be a stubborn idiot? Which is it?
All supporters of infanticide are Jewish to me.
I'm not framing anything as worse. You said "the stats say otherwise." Then you provided a second statistic, which is true, but does not say otherwise.
That's it. That's all I'm correcting. You're fighting an imaginary enemy in this thread.