No, you are misrepresenting the statistics. This is exactly how stats work: you take data and exclude / include whatever it takes to make a grand statement that, while technically true, misrepresents the broader reality of the situation.
Abortion kills white people more than all others combined. Why are you framing it as somehow worse for other demographics or somehow beneficial to whites? This can only be done by intentionally excluding the fact of the supermajority.
Either you're stupid or you're doing this on purpose to subvert the paradigm.
So what is it? Have you learned something? Or are you stubbornly stupid? Or are you a malicious actor? Or are you a malicious actor who's gonna pretend to be a stubborn idiot? Which is it?
I'm not framing anything as worse. You said "the stats say otherwise." Then you provided a second statistic, which is true, but does not say otherwise.
That's it. That's all I'm correcting. You're fighting an imaginary enemy in this thread.
No it does say otherwise. The main implication of the post (pro-abortion) is based on its misrepresentation of stats via excluding the supermajority. While you could say its technically true that "groups more likely... ", the main point (being pro-abortion) and the main implication (abortion benefits whites) are contradicted and voided upon context (the supermajority) being revealed.
The context is selective to make the stats fit the desired narrative. This is obvious because the narrative falls apart upon knowing the full data of those same stats.
No, you are misrepresenting the statistics. This is exactly how stats work: you take data and exclude / include whatever it takes to make a grand statement that, while technically true, misrepresents the broader reality of the situation.
Abortion kills white people more than all others combined. Why are you framing it as somehow worse for other demographics or somehow beneficial to whites? This can only be done by intentionally excluding the fact of the supermajority.
Either you're stupid or you're doing this on purpose to subvert the paradigm.
So what is it? Have you learned something? Or are you stubbornly stupid? Or are you a malicious actor? Or are you a malicious actor who's gonna pretend to be a stubborn idiot? Which is it?
All supporters of infanticide are Jewish to me.
I'm not framing anything as worse. You said "the stats say otherwise." Then you provided a second statistic, which is true, but does not say otherwise.
That's it. That's all I'm correcting. You're fighting an imaginary enemy in this thread.
No it does say otherwise. The main implication of the post (pro-abortion) is based on its misrepresentation of stats via excluding the supermajority. While you could say its technically true that "groups more likely... ", the main point (being pro-abortion) and the main implication (abortion benefits whites) are contradicted and voided upon context (the supermajority) being revealed.
The context is selective to make the stats fit the desired narrative. This is obvious because the narrative falls apart upon knowing the full data of those same stats.