It's especially funny since for years the left has been warning men that they need to be left wing to get pussy anymore. Endless videos of women claiming they won't date Maga men, etc.
Ah, yes. Such a crying shame when people become less prone to behaving like angry activist lunatics and getting offended all the time. Truly a travesty.
Even more ironic is how mild this is compared to the "inverse", when leftists would completely shut down any and all remotely contrary or oppositional views, no matter how civil or tame those opinions were or how they were expressed.
I'm just assuming by boys they mean white boys? As far as increasing tradwives, fine by me, the tv has lionized single motherhood since the 80s. A little shift to traditional is a good thing
I know. Insane how they view a traditional nuclear family with contempt. At least in the 80s we still had some shows. We watched Family Ties and Cosby show religiously when I was a kid. Also, there is a reason that Leave it to Beaver and Father Knows Best is in syndication to this day
The family is the building block of community and nation. They don’t want you to have a strong and cohesive identity based upon your immutable characteristics because then you will resist their plans to atomize everyone into interchangeable cogs who exist only to serve in culturally bereft androgynous economic zones.
group of kids is talking casually about something. Seemingly out of the blue, one of the boys makes an off-handed joke. Maybe it’s racist or sexist or homophobic, but whatever the poison, they inject it and the group dynamic shifts ever so slightly. As a general rule, the boys continue as usual while the girls – who tend to be more politically progressive – face a choice: they can speak up, which usually results in them getting the reputation as annoying and unable to take a joke, or they can let it pass and be regarded as a chill girl who isn’t angry or woke. Since November 2024, the latter reaction has become far more common.
“I’m a humorless shrew whose only values lie solely on intersectional identitarianism”
In December of 2024, Disney removed a transgender character from a new series. This April, the New York Times reported that a new Trump administration regulation bars government employees from adding pronouns to their email bios. Two days after that, Gannet, one of the US’s largest newspaper chains, cited Trump’s opposition to Diversity, Equity and Inclusion when announcing that it would no longer publish statistics on employee diversity.
“Oh no my intersectional identitarianism!”
This cultural shift promotes nostalgia for an earlier time, before the birth of DEI, when women wore aprons and let their husbands earn the money. As of August, “trad wife” influencer Hannah Neeleman, better known as Ballerina Farm, has amassed 10 million followers on Instagram alone. Her videos of kneading sourdough and raising her eight kids mark a return to the ideal of women as homemakers. Last November, she appeared on the cover of Evie, a conservative magazine that openly praises Trump.
“The horrors of a nuclear family!”
This trickles down to us. In the Trump era, left-leaning teenage girls feel less comfortable expressing political views that could be derided as “woke”. This isn’t because most of them are becoming rightwing: last November, 58% of women ages 18-30 voted for Kamala Harris. It’s because the political atmosphere has changed and progressive-minded girls now feel more afraid of the consequences of speaking their minds.
“We’re oppressed because people will disagree with us!”
The girls I talked to say it’s riskier to be outspokenly blue. A high school girl reported that boys “are becoming more emboldened, more confident to make these [bigoted] jokes”. Another said that since Trump took office, casual racism and sexism has become common: “We see [the behavior] more and it’s happening to us.” Young women feel social pressure to remain passive in the face of offensive remarks. Your guy friends “will think you’re attacking them”, one girl said, adding that “it’s not worth it” to speak out against every incident. You need to “pick your battles”.
Thank goodness the arbiters of morality aren’t teenage girls anymore.
A third girl added that the desire to not be known as one of those “super woke” girls is enough to make someone clamp their lips, knowing that if the girl objects, “there is no chance [boys] will ever take you seriously again.” These opinions are harsh, but they’re true. Pew Research Center reports that as of March, 45% of girls ages 13-17 feel “a great deal” of pressure to fit in socially, and as cultural conservatism grows, that changes what fitting in means. Even in comparatively liberal spaces, like my high school, girls who wince at locker room talk risk exclusion. No one wants to hang out with the stickler, so no one wants to become her. And therefore, juvenile illiberalism lives on.
Why should they take you seriously? Also “juvenile illiberalism”, hilarious a girl claiming identity attacks are bad immediately resorts to them as a retarded attempt at a barb.
Trump has damaged our country in many blatant ways, but what I’m seeing is more subtle. Tectonic shifts don’t always make it to CNN. The cultural effects of this openly racist and sexist government on young people may skew gender relations as we enter the workforce, enabling sexual assault and discrimination and keeping women from positions of power. The divide between young women and young men is growing massively, with no end in sight. Trump is distorting American society, and I fear distorting us.
I hope it does. The DEI insanity will die with the boomers and women will actually have to compete for jobs, enjoy reaping what your retarded feminist forebears have sown.
Pew Research Center reports that as of March, 45% of girls ages 13-17 feel “a great deal” of pressure to fit in socially, and as cultural conservatism grows, that changes what fitting in means.
This one is subtle. The teenage girls who reported feeling “a great deal of pressure to fit in socially” were almost certainly talking about pressure to conform to leftism. That has been the dominant pressure among teenage girls for decades and is almost certainly what that survey reflected.
The author of the article asserts that this same pressure must apply in the opposite direction now that the overall culture is shifting to the right - except that’s not a valid assumption. “We pressured the shit out of these kids to behave a certain way, so now the exact same thing must be happening when conservatives are in control of the culture.” She’s projecting her own side’s terrible behavior onto us and then condemning us for it.
Meanwhile, in reality, boys are simply abandoning and retaliating against an ideology that openly hates them. If girls are picking up on that trend and reacting with empathy instead of hostility, that’s a positive development.
Leftist shrews are obviously buttmad about this because they’ve always defaulted to being “empowered independent women” aka insufferable disagreeable cunts. Maybe young girls can see that their immediate predecessors are “girl bossing” their way into spinster misery and have decided they don’t want that future for themselves.
We got a real world example with Pam Bondi's retarded take regarding "hate speech" and subsequent "correction" when smarter people called out her retardation.
I don’t think I disagree with any of this. Empathy was probably a poor word choice.
Although, maybe not? More and more, I’m not sure empathy, as we purport to understand it, even exists. At least not in statistically significant amounts within the general population.
What we think of as “empathy” almost always takes one of two forms:
virtue signaling, often times against the enemy
triggered by personally experiencing pain
The first is one is exactly the sort of consensus-based behavior you observe in women. The second is just the pain-motivated response we see in most creatures. Neither behavior really falls under our common definitions of empathy.
It's not the same Naomi Beinhart, or at least they're trying to pretend it's not. Surely not even the MSM would try to pass this off as a 17 year old from the USA.
Yes, women/girls are much more sensitive to social pressure, use that in your favor. Boys lead, girls follow, nature heals. This article makes me very excited about the future.
...which usually results in them getting the reputation as annoying and unable to take a joke, or they can let it pass and be regarded as a chill girl who isn’t angry or woke.
So you're saying that lobsters mate better with other chilled blood creatures of the same species, and that women aren't naturally funny.
The girls I talked to say it’s riskier to...
Talk? Walk? Stick their thumbs in their mouths? What do girls have to compare against with any authority from experience? Sounds to me like you coerced young minds into agreeing with you which doesn't have protected PDF these days. Perhaps you should speak with women rather than children when it comes to asking for comparisons. Oh, that's right, women will tell you to fuck off and so leave the kids alone you harpy spinster filled with rage.
Trump has damaged our country in many blatant ways, but what I’m seeing is more subtle. Tectonic shifts don’t always make it to CNN. The cultural effects of this openly racist and sexist government on young people may skew gender relations as we enter the workforce, enabling sexual assault and discrimination and keeping women from positions of power. The divide between young women and young men is growing massively, with no end in sight. Trump is distorting American society, and I fear distorting us.
Wonderful! It's nice that his supporters are still working to fix the country, even though Trump is too busy selling us out to India and Israel to give a fuck. Maybe one of these days we will get the government we voted for and they will actually fucking help.
The Republican party has a fucking mandate to go balls out on a push to the right, and they are still sitting on their thumbs hoping that they lose the midterms so they can do their duty as controlled opposition. It is becoming apparent that they are standing between us and our enemies, not to protect and fight for us, but to do it for them.
Yes, most women just wanna hang with men and work with them.
Chill women who aren't activist cunts and realize yo, men are kinda cool. IMAGINE THAT.
The funny thing is, it is very easy to see there's moderate women that exist who don't let their ideology run their lives - they're in the VTuber sphere. Lots of independent VTubers may have some leftist faggotry still ingrained in them, but most of the time they don't give a shit. They make the same jokes guys do, some even ramp it up to 11 (Filian made a bomb joke while going through TSA and ended up being questioned by them, everyone roasted her for it and made for lulz behavior because of her autism).
Could also be as another poster here said in another thread, VTubing tends to attract the more autistic/retarded women, and I learned that these types of women actually hang better with the boys, because they don't have the "i'm a bitch that gets angry at everything" debuff of "empathy" cuz that part of the brain doesn't work.
Might be detrimental if you're around a bunch of cunts who get easily offended, but if you're around guys? It's a free for all.
It really is that easy.
It's especially funny since for years the left has been warning men that they need to be left wing to get pussy anymore. Endless videos of women claiming they won't date Maga men, etc.
And honesty 99.9% of them are best to be avoided anyway. Keep them out of the gene pool
Ah, yes. Such a crying shame when people become less prone to behaving like angry activist lunatics and getting offended all the time. Truly a travesty.
Even more ironic is how mild this is compared to the "inverse", when leftists would completely shut down any and all remotely contrary or oppositional views, no matter how civil or tame those opinions were or how they were expressed.
Oh no, girls are realizing that chad doesn't like being lectured by woke prudes. The horror...
I'm just assuming by boys they mean white boys? As far as increasing tradwives, fine by me, the tv has lionized single motherhood since the 80s. A little shift to traditional is a good thing
I know. Insane how they view a traditional nuclear family with contempt. At least in the 80s we still had some shows. We watched Family Ties and Cosby show religiously when I was a kid. Also, there is a reason that Leave it to Beaver and Father Knows Best is in syndication to this day
Strong families make strong individuals who don’t need government to take care of them.
The family is the building block of community and nation. They don’t want you to have a strong and cohesive identity based upon your immutable characteristics because then you will resist their plans to atomize everyone into interchangeable cogs who exist only to serve in culturally bereft androgynous economic zones.
Also the reason why feminism pushed so hard for women in the workplace and no-fault divorce.
But but but I was told we’re an economic zone!
Strong families keep people off the streets and enforce rules on unruly women.
“I’m a humorless shrew whose only values lie solely on intersectional identitarianism”
“Oh no my intersectional identitarianism!”
“The horrors of a nuclear family!”
“We’re oppressed because people will disagree with us!”
Thank goodness the arbiters of morality aren’t teenage girls anymore.
Why should they take you seriously? Also “juvenile illiberalism”, hilarious a girl claiming identity attacks are bad immediately resorts to them as a retarded attempt at a barb.
I hope it does. The DEI insanity will die with the boomers and women will actually have to compete for jobs, enjoy reaping what your retarded feminist forebears have sown.
Considering the guardian sees everything as racist or sexist or “homophobic” their opinion can be discarded
It's the Anita Sarkeesian quote applied to everything
“Everything is Anita; everything is Zoe; and you have to point it all out!”
This one is subtle. The teenage girls who reported feeling “a great deal of pressure to fit in socially” were almost certainly talking about pressure to conform to leftism. That has been the dominant pressure among teenage girls for decades and is almost certainly what that survey reflected.
The author of the article asserts that this same pressure must apply in the opposite direction now that the overall culture is shifting to the right - except that’s not a valid assumption. “We pressured the shit out of these kids to behave a certain way, so now the exact same thing must be happening when conservatives are in control of the culture.” She’s projecting her own side’s terrible behavior onto us and then condemning us for it.
Meanwhile, in reality, boys are simply abandoning and retaliating against an ideology that openly hates them. If girls are picking up on that trend and reacting with empathy instead of hostility, that’s a positive development.
Leftist shrews are obviously buttmad about this because they’ve always defaulted to being “empowered independent women” aka insufferable disagreeable cunts. Maybe young girls can see that their immediate predecessors are “girl bossing” their way into spinster misery and have decided they don’t want that future for themselves.
We got a real world example with Pam Bondi's retarded take regarding "hate speech" and subsequent "correction" when smarter people called out her retardation.
I don’t think I disagree with any of this. Empathy was probably a poor word choice.
Although, maybe not? More and more, I’m not sure empathy, as we purport to understand it, even exists. At least not in statistically significant amounts within the general population.
What we think of as “empathy” almost always takes one of two forms:
virtue signaling, often times against the enemy
triggered by personally experiencing pain
The first is one is exactly the sort of consensus-based behavior you observe in women. The second is just the pain-motivated response we see in most creatures. Neither behavior really falls under our common definitions of empathy.
Florence Nightingale was right about women.
Damn this is one of the bigger whitepills I've seen in a while.
Why is this very real 16 to 17 years old girl suddenly an expert on men and publishing opinion pieces on multiple newspapers?
I’m 16. On Nov. 6 the Girls Cried, and the Boys Played Minecraft.
Why are high school boys drawn to the manosphere?
Even if she wasn't some astroturfed figure, think of Greta Thunberg, are we taking our political opinions from literal highschoolers now?
Because the left is overwhelmingly retarded women and retarded women don’t emotionally progress past grade school
Gee i wonder who wrote this kiked article
My god, its a Jewraffe!
It's not the same Naomi Beinhart, or at least they're trying to pretend it's not. Surely not even the MSM would try to pass this off as a 17 year old from the USA.
Not sure, she does have this Jew-ad:
https://www.instagram.com/drnaomib/p/DOqNn1OCFrn/
Hmm.
I didn’t need to look it up to know. It just smells
Yes, women/girls are much more sensitive to social pressure, use that in your favor. Boys lead, girls follow, nature heals. This article makes me very excited about the future.
So...you're saying there's hope.
Thanks, Guardian.
...wow, those words felt weird.
So you're saying that lobsters mate better with other chilled blood creatures of the same species, and that women aren't naturally funny.
Talk? Walk? Stick their thumbs in their mouths? What do girls have to compare against with any authority from experience? Sounds to me like you coerced young minds into agreeing with you which doesn't have protected PDF these days. Perhaps you should speak with women rather than children when it comes to asking for comparisons. Oh, that's right, women will tell you to fuck off and so leave the kids alone you harpy spinster filled with rage.
Good, less hysterical bullshit from women is only ever a good thing
Wonderful! It's nice that his supporters are still working to fix the country, even though Trump is too busy selling us out to India and Israel to give a fuck. Maybe one of these days we will get the government we voted for and they will actually fucking help.
The Republican party has a fucking mandate to go balls out on a push to the right, and they are still sitting on their thumbs hoping that they lose the midterms so they can do their duty as controlled opposition. It is becoming apparent that they are standing between us and our enemies, not to protect and fight for us, but to do it for them.
So the guardian is terrified that girls might not grow up to be weird barren cunts with tattoos and problem glasses? The horror.
Yes, most women just wanna hang with men and work with them.
Chill women who aren't activist cunts and realize yo, men are kinda cool. IMAGINE THAT.
The funny thing is, it is very easy to see there's moderate women that exist who don't let their ideology run their lives - they're in the VTuber sphere. Lots of independent VTubers may have some leftist faggotry still ingrained in them, but most of the time they don't give a shit. They make the same jokes guys do, some even ramp it up to 11 (Filian made a bomb joke while going through TSA and ended up being questioned by them, everyone roasted her for it and made for lulz behavior because of her autism).
Could also be as another poster here said in another thread, VTubing tends to attract the more autistic/retarded women, and I learned that these types of women actually hang better with the boys, because they don't have the "i'm a bitch that gets angry at everything" debuff of "empathy" cuz that part of the brain doesn't work.
Might be detrimental if you're around a bunch of cunts who get easily offended, but if you're around guys? It's a free for all.
"It’s because the political atmosphere has changed and progressive-minded girls now feel more afraid of the consequences of speaking their minds."
Good, they're learning their place.
Chill? Better term than 'pick me'
This is a good shift.