Boomer brain is so tiresome
(twitter.com)
Comments (74)
sorted by:
Roman empire needs mercenaries bro, we have no choice!
Yes, in fact, I can recommend some people I know.
Boomers need someone to keep funding their lavish lifestyles to the grave. So they import slave labor and keep screwing over every generation after them.
Why we haven't cut their social programs and raised their costs is beyond my understanding.
Yeah pretty much how I feel about it too.
"We got ours, fuck everyone else."
I was reading the other day, again where they are warning social security may not exist in 10 years(last time they did this was when trump got elected the first time i believe, but they kept repeating this when bush jr was in office both times too, good ol military war complex).
Here I am worrying about not having a job to pay into it lmao. I figured if I can get my health issues fixed (assuming i survive long enough to go back home), ill just work until the day I die. Before all this bullshit Ive had a job (summer jobs included), or been school/college since I was prolly 14(through a work youth thing). Seems fitting somehow. Not having a job really fucks with me, makes me feel subhuman but I can barely even move anymore LMAO. Theres no OOOMPH left in my body, which makes me think its prolly cancer. That would simplify things lol.
Anyway, these fucking idiots. We, the people, (well most of us), have been paying into social security, thinking that the money would be used to better the country and take care of us after retirement.
And the rich were to busy investing in their material mansions, cars, jets, etc and have really fucked us all now.
Sorry to hear about that, how's your gut health? If you stress alot and feel exhausted and your shit is all fucked up you could have a fungal infection.
This is your supposed Heritage “conservative”. The Reaganite republicans have been an unmitigated travesty on this country.
The Regan Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
Reagan giving California away to foreigners and putting all the asylum inmates back into the breeding population might end up being what gives us the Libtard Reich.
At least the democrats are honest about their hatred of Whites
Most of the Reaganite Republicans aren't significantly different from the Buchanan Brigade. You're looking at basically one issue, which was supposed to be that amnesty would take place and migration would stop after that.
The Heritage Foundation represents the Bushites and their precursors: the Rockefeller Republicans. AKA: The Liberal Republicans. They always have.
Goldwater, Buchanon, Reagan, and the TEA Party are all the same conservative, populist, anti-establishment movement. Trump simply jumped onboard.
Your alternative is the Gerald Ford Deep State Globalists, or the Jimmy Carter & Walter Mondale Socialists. Those are still the same factions we are dealing with.
Yup. The only positive of the Reagan amnesty is that it provides an excellent counterargument against the "people" still pushing amnesty. No, we tried that, and the government shit the bed. Waves of amnesty just further incentivize illegal migration. All illegals must go. We had one shot, for better or worse, at amnesty. And we already did that, so we can't do it again.
Right. Amnesty was a lie to move the goal post and convince people to stop the deportations while "only bringing in the ones we need". Same lie, different decade.
Reagan ended no fault divorce, closed the asylums, started the government debt cycle, got the US involved in Iran/Iraq, and oversaw the initial imbalance of importing third worlders while white European immigration dropped for the first time in American history. He was the most effective liberal republican in history.
He also signed the NFA
At least we might get 2/3rds of that revoked, if Congress ever actually passes the one bill they're considering this entire year.
No Fault Divorce was going to happen one way or another as part of the sexual revolution. JFK killed the asylum systems, not Reagan. The government debt cycle is a continuation of Keynsian economic policy, that you can put on FDR. The US was close to Iraq before he took office. The US's relationship with the Shaw of Iran goes back to the 50's, and the fight against the ayatollahs is one he inherited. And, like I said, the amnesty was supposed to be the first step in ending the immigration crisis that existed at the time.
No, that's Richard Nixon.
Hypothetical revisionism
JFK started the process, Carter tried reversing some of it, and Reagan killed it outright in an omnibus bill.
And Reagan was still the first to set precedent by tripling the national debt during his tenure. It was the single largest increase in debt under one president at the time.
It’s also one he made irreparably worse and fueled the Iranian hatred of America when we were killing 20k Iranians with chemical weapons through Saddam.
The illegal migration crisis, he mass imported “legal” Hispanics and Asians and oversaw the first decline of white European immigrants.
It's not hypothetical revisionism, it's the reality of the culture on the ground. You're worried about one state passing a marriage law as if it was the cause to everything else. The Sexual Revolution was far broader than that.
JFK did permanent damage and built the system we have today.
I don't think your national debt stat is right. Normally, I would just assume that the largest increases in National debt would have been the Louisiana Purchase, the American Civil War, WW1, and WW2.
This chart only goes back to the 30's, so we can't see the first 3, but it does cover WW2. The biggest jump is a 90% increase in 1942-1943, which is what I would expect. I don't think the national debt increases by 50% in any one year from 1980-1990.
Obviously, Roosevelt is terrible here at debt increase, so from 1933-1946, the national debt increased by 10,000%. From 1981-1989, it's a 186% increase. I think that might be lower than Bush and Obama. The Louisiana Purchase, Civil War, and WW1 are extremely bad amounts of spending. Just doing a quick search, the Treasury department websites said the debt increased by twenty times in WW1, so, not sure how that lines up with Woodrow Wilson's presidency, but it's gonna be bad. And the Civil War national debt jumped FOURTY times, which, by the looks of it, would make Abraham Lincoln the winner by a mile. Even FDR didn't increase spending that much.
I'd put the chemical weapons stuff on Bush more than Reagan again, but even more so, the Iranians had no like of us because of our relationship with the Shaw. It was already irreparable.
Again, the "legal" migration crisis was supposed to be ended. We can also see that it was argued that there would be no ethnographic change to the US because it was the first step in solving the migration situation.
The largest state and the one that dominated cultural influence at that time and for decades after.
And Reagan was complicit the entire time from governor to president. He also gave the death blow.
Maybe I should have been more specific, debt we never paid off or intended to pay off. We went from a debt of 116% gdp in 1946 to 24% in 1974. Reagan took it from 30% during a recession and left it at 56% Bush 1 took it from 56-65%, Clinton from 65%-56%, W from 56-84%, Obama from 84-102%, Trump from 102-124% but that was mostly covid.
The chemical weapons all happened under Reagan.
Which is a lie, Reagan started H2A visas and Bush 1 implemented H1Bs. They are the same ilk.
Yeah, because Americans aren't allowed to compete for those jobs, and there are systems in place to unfairly advantage foreigners...at American taxpayer expense.
Also, of course, the desire to replace white people, which is a big part of the root, and why they want infinity immigration.
It's not coincidental, or the fault of the Americans, or the merit of the foreigners that causes this pattern of job growth. It's a coordinated fucking attack. It's a weapon.
Just the requirement to get the shot drove a lot of people out of the work force. It made it clear that they view their workers as slaves and not as individual employees.
Why would any self respecting White person invest in that system?
Worse is they demonize White man while further humiliating White man by brainwashing White woman to mudshark/coal burn.
Every fucking and TV shows this racemix garbage of White woman and nonWhite man, and sadly young White woman of genZ and Millennials have bought into this disgusting agenda
This is the most important part. Biden's labor growth came almost exclusively from immigrants in the private sector; and beyond that came from government employment.
Turning around and saying that therefore you need immigrants and bureaucrats to keep the economy afloat is just the Leftists "talking past the sale".
Yup, "Americans won't do those jobs." Let us try, you absolute scumfucks.
I love those stories of post-raid factories filling up with Americans looking for jobs. They lied to us for decades. And it was incredibly blatant. Finally, thanks to Trump's policies, we're seeing it exposed on a larger scale. Combined with less boomers, maybe people will finally wake up in large enough numbers that this is no longer tenable.
It actually seems to be the majority support from hispanics and blacks in the past election cycles. Getting blacks and more legal immigrants employed, and removing illegals who are taking the majority of both public funding and private employment out of those communities is building real rapport with them.
I think I know the answer, but who is coordinating the attack and what is the benefit of doing so? I have my own thought but curious of your take.
GDP vs GDP per capita.
Boomers have a simple model. They believe more people => more gdp.
This is wrong.
Many of these immigrants will be financially negative on society for their entire lifetime
Blacks on average: -750k per person
Our biggest immigrant class, Hispanics: -550k per person
Were importing our debt while calling their subsidized labor “growth”
https://x.com/jonatanpallesen/status/1845525384407953560
There is no age when “MENAPT” are financially net positive 😂
The great replacement will continue
"Per capita" is white supremacism, reeeeeee!
But boomers did have breakfast.
It's not even limited to financially. Most of them are negative for society, full stop.
They just want to parrot diversity propaganda (draped in red white and blue) and have cheap labor come fix their shit since they either: didn't have kids or have estranged themselves from their kids.
What is the point of growth if none of my family will benefit from it?
Whoa, whoa, whoa, don't you care about your Economic Zone, you fascist?
Very racist, you must be replaced and humiliated as your own woman are brainwashed to fuck the invaders instesd of White man
And once they import enough foreigners that young heritage American workers become a minority, why would the new majority continue funding boomers? Those old retards are voting for their own eviction from retirement homes to make room for more "migrants".
Speaking of funding, it's not sustainable. If you replace Americans (and thus the taxpayers) with foreigners who are subsidized to work for cheaper...who pays the taxes to keep them working for cheap...themselves? All the wealth will have already been siphoned, and you just end up with a poverty spiral until we're fully third world.
The boomers will be dead by then so they don't care. They're perfectly content to condemn their children and grandchildren just so long as line continues to go up until they kick the bucket.
Then they can starve on the streets, I certainly won't open my home to any Boomer.
The government will open it for you.
The population of the United States in the 1950s was less than half what it is today (~160 million) and things were OK. With AI and robotics coming online we can have them phased in to pick up the slack.
Sorry Stephen. No slaves for you. You'll have to settle for a robot to abuse.
How about we actually look at the problem instead of putting a bandaid on it? WHY are birth rates plummeting? Might be something to do with your ouroboros of a 'solution', maybe? Hard to consider having children when you're competing for scraps with half the world's ravenous brown hordes.
sigh He knows this. It's not even worth the energy I expended to type this out.
All of whom have lots of children despite being desperately poor. Because it’s got nothing to do with economics. Feminism is what kills birth rates. Women spending their entire fertility window careering and partying is why every “developed” nation is staring down demographic collapse.
Whilst this is true, you also have to understand that shitskins don't have any standards. They don't have any issues living in filth and eating rotten food. Therefore you can never compete with that low unless you are willing to live in a unsanitary slum, diseases rampant, eating low nutrition goyslop.
They don't even do that, they're propped up because theyre so poor and oppressed. They get free EVERYTHING.
I think the problem is multifaceted; both economics and feminism play a role (and they also influence each other).
End the demonization of White man and brainwashing of White woman to race mix and this stops
Exactly. Its education first.
Because making women property again doesn't work once you give them the right to vote against that.
These people aren’t going to magically change in their final years. We just have to do the best we can until the boomers are finally gone.
The thing that truly galls me more than anything else is that they will go to their graves believing they did the right thing and were enlightened stewards of the civilisation. They will never experience the consequences of their luxury politics.
We're going to have to take a decade of negative growth. We can almost certainly handle that.
This faggot is worried that when he retires his giant pile of money won't be useful for anything.
I fucking hope that happens. I hope he chokes on his own dollar bills for lack of any sense.
No.
I try to be forgiving. Boomers had the deck stacked against them in a lot of ways. But they make it so hard not to despise them.
They like to talk about bootstraps and tight belts, but they eat garbage because it's cheap, wear plastic bags because it's cheap, and will throw their nations in a chipper shredder because no one prepared for a demographic decline that everyone has known was coming for seventy-five years.
Boomers as a voting block are the only to go from liberal to conservative to liberal. They’re the biggest “me” generation in human history and did a ladder pull on every generation after them economically. It would maybe be slightly redeemable if they weren’t fighting tooth and nail for more debt they’ll never pay while trying to create a larger housing bubble than the early 2000s.
Agree on all counts. Where I have to be forgiving is that boomers were the first generation to be subjected to modern propaganda from the womb.
The solution is similar to the "conservative female influencer" paradox. The best thing a boomer can do at this point is shut the fuck up and ask the most racist man he can find to tell him who to vote for.
True, they were the tv and consumerism trial generation and they didn’t have the information access many of us were born into or had at a young age.
Having their parents integrate their schools at gunpoint was a death sentence. Even down to the second half of the 20C being unusually cool, making boomers susceptible to muh climate change, because, yeah, the weather has never done x, y, or z in their lifetime. Boomers are a perfect storm of brainwashing susceptibility.
Is that true? I've never heard that about the second half of the 20th century, but it would explain a lot.
It might've been the first half, and boomers grew up being told by their parents that it was too hot in the 60s-80s. I don't remember and, frankly, don't care.
Climate data, just the data, is a joke. To the point that you can find articles arguing that data from 1900-1930 was straight up collected wrong and ruins all the models.
How about we let it happen so the American worker can finally get a good competitive job.
We are only now getting to a labor force participation rate that has been as low as it was in 1977. We currently have a labor force participation rate that is lower than our pre-Covid 2019 numbers.
We have all the people we need. We just made sure there was no reason to employ any of them.
I gave a better idea. Cut gibs, and people can work instead of leeching off the rest of us.
Sorry, the right to cut gibs was blocked by a Jewish female judge
Go one day without screeching about the jews
Challenge level: impossible
Does that also include foreign aid gibs? How about central bank printing money for itself gibs?
Yes, and yes. Balanced budget would be ideal (long term). Right now, we should pay off debt.
No we don't, we could just cut some unnecessary costs out and put that money into growing our industry's infrastructure and automation. The billions wasted on stuff like boomers pensions or their subsidized healthcare could be making the country so much more productive instead.
The only thing we might need immigration for is to prop up your old asses even after you've destroyed our country.
The proper solution is natalism and the eradication of intersectional progressives and other sexist bitches and their supporters from the population.
maybe 2% is fine
Robots about to put almost everyone out of work within the next 10 to 15 yrs makes this take so pointless.