Afrikaner friend is posting about how families leaving South Africa for the USA look like evil rednecks and obviously stupid. Other friends are chiming in how Trump is sending away Afghanistan refugees and that they're the wrong color, and that's why.
Then the English friends are posting about how Afghanistan being a terrible place and sending people back is a terrible thing. Meanwhile South Africa is a great place and no evil horrible thing is happening.
It's been going like this all day.
They applied for asylum correctly. I saw the pictures of families arriving and they seem happy and grateful. Forgive me if I’m tired of people coming here who hate America and can’t stop protesting, so this was refreshing. The issues in South Africa are there if the media bothered to look
they don't want normies knowing about south africa's problems because they want to do everything being done there here
imagine what they'd be doing to us under president pajeeta
1000% correct with this comment
I think they want America to look more like Lebanon, but tomato-tomato.
At this point I don't care if Trump is bending/breaking the law for them. After the shit they pulled under Biden Trump could import every European/Canadian/Aussie/Kiwi right winger and I wouldn't give a shit.
They didn’t show up waving a South African flag, chanting fuck America, and signing up immediately for welfare, clearly they are a threat to national security and “democracy”
Exactly. Although I guarantee if one of those kids gets detention in school the media will do 24/7 reporting on immigrant crime
They can't, for a number of reasons. Afrikaners have lived in that part of the African continent centuries longer than the country's current Bantu majority. Oops! There was a small tribe of Black Africans in the same region, but I can't recall their name and wiki's Demographics page suspiciously lumps them all into "Black" and ignores actual ethnicity (something that was not the case 10 years ago). From the late 19th to mid 20th century monied interests allowed the mass migration of Bantu groups as cheap labor. Sound familiar? This obviously lead to South Africa's segregationally oriented laws of the second half of the 20th century. Was it unjust? Maybe, but the results of ending Apartheid were a disaster. Don't believe me? Ask the Zulu monarch. Then of course, there's the killings...
The Khoisans are the indigenous peoples of South Afrika, then came the Dutch / Afrikaners who largely cohabited peacefully on different parts of current South Afrika.
Then came the Bantu invaders, who slaughtered Whites and Khoisans. The Bantu mass-migration continued after the bloody mitilary invasions.
Thanks. I had the damnedest time trying to find their name on wiki2025.
I didn’t know Zulus were still around. Was their war with the British after the Afrikaners arrived?
First Afrikaners arrived in the mid 17th, and the Zulu war was in the late 19th. I should note my initial comment does over simplify things a bit, but the complexities of ethnic/tribal groups of central and southern Africa and the migrations of the past few centuries are complicated and, frankly, not something I'm an expert on. For example, the Zulu kingdom of the 19th century is a tiny tiny portion of what is today South Africa. PS. Zulu (1964) is a fantastic movie.
Thanks! I need to see that movie. That is a topic I have been meaning to research further (Zulu war and history of South Africa). I also heard that the tribes that the Zulus were terrorizing helped the British similar to the tribes in Mexico helping the Spanish against the Aztecs
That is my understanding. Its high time people reexamine "colonialism" for what is was: pre 20th century geopolitics. The history of colonialism in India is particularly amusing. Two centuries of local rulers wanting foreign assistance (due to invaders, competition, or civil uprising) and having to give something in return for said assistance. Turns out that that the British didn't conquer India, a couple of centuries of self-interested local rulers sold out one bit at a time. Then the locals bitched until the Empire gave them their country back (infrastructure and all) for free. And today Indians claim the English owe them $45 Trillion dollars. Its a hoot.
EEEHHHHHHHHHH
What you're describing is still a form of conquest. Particularly because it was an intentional effort by Britain to subjugate all of India, including parts that were owned by the Portuguese. Whenever the Portuguese said "No", because they knew what the British were doing, the Brits had no problem blowing their forts and garrisons to hell. The 'soft' conquest of India was still going to be backed up with massive military force if the Brits didn't get their way, but since the British never had a million man army prior to WW1, it wasn't reasonable to come in and burn everything. They had to conquer in a more subversive way.
The indigenous people to South Africa are the Zulu, Khoisans, and the Afrikans. The Bantu should be deported.
Apartheid was shit for a lot of reasons, and the racism wasn't even the worst part. You could have ended Apartheid without explicitly allowing a race communist take over, though.
The media is specifically hiding it. Even my friend knows this, but to give up his homeland is too much for him.
Tell your friend it isn't 'giving up' his homeland but a tactical retreat.
Basically it's like the 'long march' in China just not commie: You escape encirclement, retreat to a more defensible position, build up your strength as your enemy fuck up and kill each other then storm back and take over when the native population would rather have YOU in charge than their current government.
Rednecks was/is a term for hardworking laborers/ farmers, color me shocked socialists hate that
Soooo by their own logic all the diversity “refugees” were brought in because they’re not white? Why do they hate white people?
Insert Conan O’Brien and Haiti. Leftists are making a Schrödingers cat out of shitholes anymore.
Unfortunately, I think that's a generation or more out of use. They have successfully converted it to mean "low IQ, low income whites" and use it interchangeably with Southerner (leading to people talking about being Southerners in Minnesota to refer to be white trash).
So they are saying "these guys look like retarded inbred losers!" in what is considered acceptable terms for the Leftie discourse.
Which considering how normal these guys all look, says more about what they think of Whites as a whole.
The term 'Redneck' was first put to paper by a female journalist(surprise!) as a classist insult because she wasn't one of those low-brow other people, no sir. She was better. (She was totally a fucking redneck who married into money.)
Rednecks, not giving a fuck(as far back as the 1800s while this was going about), took the term and ran with it.
It's still used as a classist insult today.
Fun aside, the term redneck actually pre-dates hillbilly, near as I can tell.
Despite the Yankees and Media trying to use all these terms as meaning the same thing they do all have wildly different meanings.
Redneck, and white trash, are the only ones with general enough meanings that they are usually accurate subjectively, but they will happily throw in shit like hillbilly about someone from a fucking swamp.
That isn't an argument nor is it a surprise. The current zeitgeist of the left is to advocate against the interests of white people in every imaginable way.
This is why they are so anti-gun, they want to do things to us that would cause us to shoot them.
So your friends are, at best, incurably stupid and at worst they are deliberate liars?
That about sum it up?
Unable to comprehend reality is also a good description.
This has been my issue with the Christian religion. Catholic prelates, for instance, seem completely unable to contend with the fact that there are real opponents to Christianity and they will do anything to win. The Bishops don't get there is a modern attempt to extinguish the religion through Marxist means and that its more insidious than feeding Christians to lions. Even if you ain't Christian, the lack of response to these attacks on western culture aught to be concerning.
I've got a long rant about the state of 'modern' Christianity in my head, but to cut it down a far bit, my personal theory is that the majority of church leadership is very well aware of how dangerous organized young men can be, and so work to gentle them at every measure.
So they're more focused on defusing what they see as the danger inside their house, refusing to acknowledge the savage outside the door.
I ain't Christian, and it's obvious that Christian sentiment for martyrdom, guilt, and shame is being used as one of the most effective weapons against it.
It's wild that Bishops think there can't be attempts at other ideologies to exterminate them. See: "The Early Muslim Conquests" by Kings & Generals. Much peace
The lack of understanding is so outrageous, I think that these are atheists rather than Christians. I think that people like the new pope are literally frauds.
Afghan is a horrible place because the people there are horrible.
Like every other shithole nation, like Haiti, Somalia, et. al. they are all shitholes because of the people who live there.
Turns out there's no such thing as magic dirt
Regarding the Afghani, let the whateverfuckistan countries take them.
The Afrikaners... Was the Netherlands full? Why is this our fucking problem?
They're refugees in the actual sense of seeking refuge, not "refugees" who are using the word as a password to bypass immigration services and tilt demographics in borderline red areas.
I saw a comment on a Youtube video, "Why can't they go to a country of European descent?"
What the fuck do they think America is?!
I welcome them because I expect them to be a net positive to the country. The left defines "looking Redneck" as anything other than soy with black commie glasses or nigger attire.
The correct answer that every white person should be saying is they are the wrong color so we should kick them out.
We had maybe 10,000 translators/collaborators from Afghanistan. At most.
Britain alone imported over 100,000 Afghans. We've probably imported another couple hundred thousand. Britain's statistics also show that the majority of them return to Taliban controlled Afghanistan on a regular basis for vacation. Something a real collaborator would be executed for. If these Afghan refugees had been collaborators, we could have defeated the Taliban, because I don't think their full offensive force was even 30,000, backed with Pakistani Taliban reserves and a few hundred Pakistani ISI advisers.
Meanwhile, White South Africans face massive institutional discrimination in the form of allowing their rapes and murders to go uninvestigated, unscrutinized, and unreported. The EFF is actively pushing for an ethnic cleansing and mass land seizure. The ANC is trying to reach out to the EFF as a kind of coalition.
Ask why do they hate white people so much?
Just call them racist bigots. These refugees are turning into African Americans after all.
It's all so tiresome.
Just stop apologizing and arguing. Yes, we want to import white people and deport brown people. Yes, it's because white people are better to be around.
In their hearts, they all know it too.