In a certain way this is probably true. Since most new films are explicitly liberal-coded, disliking them is a signal you're not a liberal (and therefore a "bigot" or whatever).
It's the same way you can guess a person's entire belief system based on whether or not they complain about pretty women in anything.
Surely that would vary on the reason why the person is complaining about that pretty woman. For example, Gal Gadot can't act, Amber Heard is an insane sociopath and Scarlett Johansson has retarded political views. Or did you mean someone complaining about the presence of pretty woman in general, in a form of media?
In the form of video game characters would be my guess. The lefties making games these days apparently find it impossible to include attractive female characters.
The prevailing theory is that all these characters are self-inserts and since leftist women are intentionally ugly, their characters are ugly by extension.
The foundational philosophies of leftism, which is just a political extension of globalism, which is run by a specific set of people, always results in a few things.
They're quite literally satanists, whether they admit it or not (for the string pullers), whether they know it or not (for the puppets). Satan thought he knew better than God. Satan is the antithesis of God, God's will, and all the truth of creation. Truth, beauty, and goodness are of God, and since satan is the antithesis, lies, ugliness, and evil are of satan. Whether you're Christian or not, that's what these people believe. Atheism was just a stepping stone to unChristianize the West and get us to embrace their inversions, and eventually open satanism.
Leftist/globalist philosophies always result in lies, ugliness, and evil. The people who believe and practice those beliefs make themselves ugly, they espouse obvious lies, and they practice obvious evils.
Their art is ugly. Their architecture is ugly. Their men are ugly. Their women are ugly. Their TV shows and movies are ugly. Their stories and lessons are ugly. Their characters and motivations are ugly. Their plans, their words, their ideas, their hearts, the fruits they bring forth, it's all ugly. And it's because they've rejected truth, and think they know better.
Complaining that they merely exist is a common Leftist trait. They recoil from fanservice or traditionally attractive women like they're Judge Claude Frollo or something.
This concept is i think the most basic and the most missed in popular dialogue.
I've called it the terminology error. Which is to say that catagory words dont denote categories but rather denote groups that the speaker feels fit said categories.
It's not the same thing, and it's why definitions are so important.
Questioning every claim first on precepts of shared language before validity is a step that's routinely skipped over.
To these people, this headline isn't even a discovery, it's a tautology. One of the definitions of bigot is "Disliking the new star wars.
the researchers did not explore the extent to which fans might have felt these characters to be poorly written or disliked for non-discriminatory reasons.
Not even sure where to start with this crap:
both 'benevolent' sexism (e.g. "a good woman should be put on a pedestal") and 'hostile' sexism (e.g. "women are too easily offended"). Next, they indicated how much they agreed with statements tapping into racist attitudes, such as "racial discrimination is no longer a problem" or "racial minorities are responsible for racial tension".
If this is all it takes to be a bigot I think I'm a trigot
and 'hostile' sexism (e.g. "women are too easily offended").
They just make up terms. Another great example is 'racial resentment', which includes such milquetoast beliefs like "blacks should make it on their own without special consideration".
Shut it all down. It's nothing but political propaganda.
MeToo did wonderful lasting damage on women's ability to cry rape and accomplish anything. It was hugely successful for them at the time, but it traded all possible credibility for short term gain and now most people are too burnt out to react as strongly to claims of rape on its own.
Double so because its racist to call rape now because of how prevalent of "migrant, illegal, poc" as the one doing it, to the point even the normies started to notice and they had to stop talking at all to prevent them from actually doing so.
That's why the Feminists of the world dropped rape as their big thing and moved to almost exclusively abortion and trannies.
It used to just be x-ism, with the subset specifically of "benevolent x-ism" getting named to explain to people how words that are meant to be kind are also damaging. Bigotry of low expectations is the most well known example of that. If you believe these things exist and were a problem, it was a genuinely helpful term for that.
Adding the hostile label to it is just lazily adding an emotional angle to it because they know x-ism has been overused to the point of people not caring about it.
This is the next frontier for white peoples. We need to overcome our fear of being labeled racist. It’s an anti-white slur that is designed to trigger total and immediate surrender - surrender of resources, arguments, traditions, nations, and really anything at all. Until this fear is overcome, there is no defense of white identities, cultures, or nations that cannot be instantly shattered by even the most retarded aggressors.
It seems LA firefighter departments policies boiled down to ''we must hire as many brown lesbians as possible, especially in high positions''.
You know the result. A fat brown lesbian in a promotional video bragging that ''don't ask me why I can't carry your husband out of a fire, tell him he shuldn't have put himself in that situation instead''.
though correlational data can't show cause-and-effect
No shit. We already knew what the game was from "linked to," but you still wrote the rest of the article. The only outstanding question is which path tax dollars pounds took to the "study."
I think I vaguely remember that study. They came to the conclusion that if you don't like it you're a bigot, but they couldn't show correlation = causation in the same study. They just really hoped you wouldn't notice because of the bigotry they really want you to have.
Similar reasoning leads them to think that making leftist content will turn us all into leftists:
They point to other research that suggests exposure to more diverse casts can actually reduce prejudice: for instance, one study found that people who often watched Will and Grace reported lower levels of prejudice towards gay men. Diverse casts, therefore, may actually help shift people's views.
It never occurs to them that maybe Will and Grace attracted a fag-friendly audience. No, it must be that watching the show makes you like fags.
or maybe it was the fact that will and grace, for all of its flaws, was better at humanizing homosexuals than the current trough of pigslop they're trying to shovel down our throats that holds them up on some unattainable pedestal of perfection, even though anyone with two brain cells to rub together can see that the characters are sociopathic mary sues...
Leftist media presents an idealized but completely inaccurate view of the reality of many of these groups.
So someone whose entire exposure to gays is through shows like Will and Grace will have a positive view of them because they look fine. Whereas someone who actually lives around a few gays will see how degenerate they are and react accordingly.
what I mean is, will and grace showed them as human beings, flawed and imperfect. modern shows have a severe problem as presenting them as the creator's idea of "perfect," which usually means an idealized version of themselves, aka, a mary sue.
Which is a complete fabrication because they act nothing like gays do in real life. Its literally lying to your face that they are "just like you and me" when they aren't in numerous critical ways in their life styles.
Its selling you on an idealized lie to get your guard down and push their agenda. Including them appearing imperfect, but only in lovable and charming ways instead of going to 10 man orgies weekly.
Will and Grace was also before they opened the floodgates and flushed a fusillade of faggotry onto society at large.
People actually think that fags have 'normal' relationships, and that gay men dating is like a man dating a woman. It's not. Nickocado Avocado has a twink boyfriend who was in tears because Nick went home and fucked another guy before he even left the airport.
So the fact that I hate every Didney Wars character except maybe Po and Kylo, but love such characters as Chewbacca, C-3PO, R2-D2, Lando Calrissian, and Mace Windu means I'm bigoted?
They can fuck off. Their position isn't even worth dignifying with a response.
Oh, no. Anyways, would you like to know about the rest of my worldview?
Yeah, I know, I have standards.
Remember, if you are white. And someone who is unrelated but looked like you did some bad slavery thing 200 years ago, you are responsible.
But if you apply the same standard to someone who assaulted you last week, you are a bigot.
In a certain way this is probably true. Since most new films are explicitly liberal-coded, disliking them is a signal you're not a liberal (and therefore a "bigot" or whatever).
It's the same way you can guess a person's entire belief system based on whether or not they complain about pretty women in anything.
Surely that would vary on the reason why the person is complaining about that pretty woman. For example, Gal Gadot can't act, Amber Heard is an insane sociopath and Scarlett Johansson has retarded political views. Or did you mean someone complaining about the presence of pretty woman in general, in a form of media?
In the form of video game characters would be my guess. The lefties making games these days apparently find it impossible to include attractive female characters.
The prevailing theory is that all these characters are self-inserts and since leftist women are intentionally ugly, their characters are ugly by extension.
The foundational philosophies of leftism, which is just a political extension of globalism, which is run by a specific set of people, always results in a few things.
They're quite literally satanists, whether they admit it or not (for the string pullers), whether they know it or not (for the puppets). Satan thought he knew better than God. Satan is the antithesis of God, God's will, and all the truth of creation. Truth, beauty, and goodness are of God, and since satan is the antithesis, lies, ugliness, and evil are of satan. Whether you're Christian or not, that's what these people believe. Atheism was just a stepping stone to unChristianize the West and get us to embrace their inversions, and eventually open satanism.
Leftist/globalist philosophies always result in lies, ugliness, and evil. The people who believe and practice those beliefs make themselves ugly, they espouse obvious lies, and they practice obvious evils.
Their art is ugly. Their architecture is ugly. Their men are ugly. Their women are ugly. Their TV shows and movies are ugly. Their stories and lessons are ugly. Their characters and motivations are ugly. Their plans, their words, their ideas, their hearts, the fruits they bring forth, it's all ugly. And it's because they've rejected truth, and think they know better.
Complaining that they merely exist is a common Leftist trait. They recoil from fanservice or traditionally attractive women like they're Judge Claude Frollo or something.
This concept is i think the most basic and the most missed in popular dialogue.
I've called it the terminology error. Which is to say that catagory words dont denote categories but rather denote groups that the speaker feels fit said categories.
It's not the same thing, and it's why definitions are so important.
Questioning every claim first on precepts of shared language before validity is a step that's routinely skipped over.
To these people, this headline isn't even a discovery, it's a tautology. One of the definitions of bigot is "Disliking the new star wars.
So the entire "study" is useless:
Not even sure where to start with this crap:
If this is all it takes to be a bigot I think I'm a trigot
They just make up terms. Another great example is 'racial resentment', which includes such milquetoast beliefs like "blacks should make it on their own without special consideration".
Shut it all down. It's nothing but political propaganda.
Does not matter how bad this "scientific studies" are. Remember Obama calling upon the study saying one one in five women experience sexual violence.
Then that narrative turned into "one in four women are raped during college", despite college being literally the safest place for any female to be.
I'm surprised we're not at 90% of women at this point
"Almost 100% of women have been looked at by a man at some point in their lives. This violence has to stop."
''Stare rape'' is an actual thing at Universities, and anywhere their drones went after brainwashing, in Clown World.
MeToo did wonderful lasting damage on women's ability to cry rape and accomplish anything. It was hugely successful for them at the time, but it traded all possible credibility for short term gain and now most people are too burnt out to react as strongly to claims of rape on its own.
Double so because its racist to call rape now because of how prevalent of "migrant, illegal, poc" as the one doing it, to the point even the normies started to notice and they had to stop talking at all to prevent them from actually doing so.
That's why the Feminists of the world dropped rape as their big thing and moved to almost exclusively abortion and trannies.
It used to just be x-ism, with the subset specifically of "benevolent x-ism" getting named to explain to people how words that are meant to be kind are also damaging. Bigotry of low expectations is the most well known example of that. If you believe these things exist and were a problem, it was a genuinely helpful term for that.
Adding the hostile label to it is just lazily adding an emotional angle to it because they know x-ism has been overused to the point of people not caring about it.
Whites have a mass fear of being called racist. It leads to them voting for and celebrating ANYTHING black.
Michael Shellenberger described how focus groups of whites in LA said “we have to vote for Karen Bass because she’s black”
This is the next frontier for white peoples. We need to overcome our fear of being labeled racist. It’s an anti-white slur that is designed to trigger total and immediate surrender - surrender of resources, arguments, traditions, nations, and really anything at all. Until this fear is overcome, there is no defense of white identities, cultures, or nations that cannot be instantly shattered by even the most retarded aggressors.
It seems LA firefighter departments policies boiled down to ''we must hire as many brown lesbians as possible, especially in high positions''.
You know the result. A fat brown lesbian in a promotional video bragging that ''don't ask me why I can't carry your husband out of a fire, tell him he shuldn't have put himself in that situation instead''.
No shit. We already knew what the game was from "linked to," but you still wrote the rest of the article. The only outstanding question is which path tax
dollarspounds took to the "study."let's be honest...
...it was probably dollars to begin with...
It's probably dollars.
I think I vaguely remember that study. They came to the conclusion that if you don't like it you're a bigot, but they couldn't show correlation = causation in the same study. They just really hoped you wouldn't notice because of the bigotry they really want you to have.
So basically, it's a https://files.catbox.moe/kl0ky2.jpg
Similar reasoning leads them to think that making leftist content will turn us all into leftists:
It never occurs to them that maybe Will and Grace attracted a fag-friendly audience. No, it must be that watching the show makes you like fags.
or maybe it was the fact that will and grace, for all of its flaws, was better at humanizing homosexuals than the current trough of pigslop they're trying to shovel down our throats that holds them up on some unattainable pedestal of perfection, even though anyone with two brain cells to rub together can see that the characters are sociopathic mary sues...
Well there is the other side of the coin.
Leftist media presents an idealized but completely inaccurate view of the reality of many of these groups.
So someone whose entire exposure to gays is through shows like Will and Grace will have a positive view of them because they look fine. Whereas someone who actually lives around a few gays will see how degenerate they are and react accordingly.
what I mean is, will and grace showed them as human beings, flawed and imperfect. modern shows have a severe problem as presenting them as the creator's idea of "perfect," which usually means an idealized version of themselves, aka, a mary sue.
Which is a complete fabrication because they act nothing like gays do in real life. Its literally lying to your face that they are "just like you and me" when they aren't in numerous critical ways in their life styles.
Its selling you on an idealized lie to get your guard down and push their agenda. Including them appearing imperfect, but only in lovable and charming ways instead of going to 10 man orgies weekly.
Will and Grace was also before they opened the floodgates and flushed a fusillade of faggotry onto society at large.
People actually think that fags have 'normal' relationships, and that gay men dating is like a man dating a woman. It's not. Nickocado Avocado has a twink boyfriend who was in tears because Nick went home and fucked another guy before he even left the airport.
“How does this help us sell more movies?”
“Movies?! 😕”
I'm pretty sure everyone who isn't comfortable with being a bigot at this point is just retarded.
https://archive.ph/ZmmAb
Thou shall like the Star Wars Sequelogy, or else!
*These are not the groids you are looking for.''
Study: People who like the new Star Wars movies are faggot troons
Oh, it's definitely true.
That said, it does say if you don't like diverse Star wars characters. But again, still true. I am prejudiced.
And I don't care.
And I think increasingly people are not caring anymore.
I'm racist. The end.
So the fact that I hate every Didney Wars character except maybe Po and Kylo, but love such characters as Chewbacca, C-3PO, R2-D2, Lando Calrissian, and Mace Windu means I'm bigoted?
They can fuck off. Their position isn't even worth dignifying with a response.
A: it was drowned the astroturfed sea of articles, opinions, and """studies""" that said the same.
Not liking diversity over good storytelling is racist. In fact being indifferent to diversity is racist.
because this bullshit has become white noise at this point?
Star Wars was a goldmine before (((Disney))) fucked it with niggers feminism and terrible writing (and retcons)
It’s not even the diversity of characters. It’s that the entire character sucked. lol
(((study)))
Whenever they negrify something there's always these fat unfuckables who come out saying "I'm so glad to see someone who looks like me!"
Therefore I do not involve myself with project that feature people who do not look like me.