Swap the entire populations of Sweden and Egypt, and in less than a generation Egypt would be a paradise, and Sweden would look like a shithole.
3rd world countries are the shitholes they are because 3rd world people live there. Race is measurable, quantifiable, and observable in the wild. Blank slate theory of human development is just so much garbage.
And I think the Swamps of the American South would be both gross, smelly and unsafe biologically speaking (disease) even if we removed the nigger population from it.
Heck you can't even remove it, as doing so is why New Orleans is literally sinking under sea level.
You can remove it, you just can't remove it willy-nilly.
New Orleans is loose dirt and maneure piled on bogland, then heavy buildings heaped on top.
Dirt... erodes and sinks and settles. Rocks, concrete, cement... You can turn a swamp into what would effectively be in geology terms a sedimentary extrusion of igneous-based conglomerate, using enough construction material. Dig deeper than the bog-dirt, right to bedrock, and then fill with stone. Dam the incoming water sources, too.
Perfectly possible. Just expensive, and would require foresight and significant advanced planning.
3rd world countries are the shitholes they are because 3rd world people live there.
This! This is also why throwing money at homelessness doesn't solve it.
I tell people that you can round up all the homeless people in a major city, house them in luxury high-rise apartments where food is delivered to them, laundry is done for them, and they have all the movies, video games, and other entertainment they could want for free, and the place look like something out of Mad Max within a week. It's not an affluence problem, it's a people problem.
America was carved out of the wilderness with handmade tools and has a climate much more harsh than these tropical shit holes. Whatever misfortune they may have isn't any worse than the challenges that Western nations had and overcame. The reason they lag so far behind is because the people there are lesser.
It is a callous but true statement that, if you kill off all non-successful humans in a city every winter just from the cold, there's not going to be many non-successful humans in that city.
We want to take care of our disadvantaged and the least of us. But that simple statement of fact stands: Homeless who are homeless for more than a year are a finite population that grows fairly slowly over time, and contracts pretty much only with their deaths. Very few homeless who've been unable to climb back after a year, overall, climb back ever again. Some do, but statistically negligible.
Every effort to long-term "sustain" the homeless, is analogous to an effort to increase the overall numbers of homeless. It would benefit "the homeless" as a class more to spend money on cops to kill drug traffickers, than to overnight-house the homeless, because it will stop future homeless from existing in the first place.
Wait, that sounds kind of... awesome? Trade harsh winters for tropical paradise. The cold would help them build character, while they're too busy fighting the weather to fight each other.
Control of the Suez Canal too. Egyptian "port authorities" constantly extort fees and even goods from vessels which are mostly owned by smaller countries that can't retaliate.
No, it would not, Egypt would look like a matriarchal hellhole, your average swede is a 80 iq low testosterone faggot who entirely depends on his nanny state, all the smart swedes have left the country a century ago.
The reason is simple, all of these countries are weak in thinking about logistics. They don't think about how to source something, how it will be transported and finally what to do after they are finished.
The reason European empires of old and the current US military is so powerful is because of their logistical capacity. These countries just care about having a thing so cut corners leading to inferior products and waste everywhere.
Forget which anthropologist it was but he lived with the Zulu for a while and reported that they didn't even HAVE words for the extended future. They had the immediate and "tomorrow" but that was it.
When will you next wake up?
Tomorrow
When will you gather more food?
Tomorrow
When will the rain come?
Tomorrow
When will that tree be fully grown?
Tomorrow
That's what I'm implying as in developed countries we do this at a micro and macro level.
In a micro level, we put trash in the bin to ensure we don't end up with pests or trip hazards
Macro, we ensure there's properly maintained landfill or disposal facilities to get rid of trash. It's why you can drink tap water in most of the West and bottled water is a requirement in the third world.
you don't even need the government to do that. The neighbourhood can do that. Some indian group that wanted to tidy up india to their credit and said that it wasn't just the government that was the problem, it was the people, that's why Little India is the filthiest town in Singapore despite Singapore being one of the cleanest countries in the world.
And this exact mentality that causes them to make filthy towns is also why they are 3rd worlders.
that's why Little India is the filthiest town in Singapore despite Singapore being one of the cleanest countries in the world.
People who have not been to Singapore will not understand just how fucking stark the difference is when you are in Little India versus the rest of Singapore.
Yishun, which is supposedly the ghetto of Singapore, is better than most first world countries AND looks better than any area of Little India.
There is even a weird ass grime on the BUILDINGS of Little India! Like how?
Doesn't matter what the government invests in when the people have 3rd world mindsets. Install all the designated trash cans and dumpsters you want, those savages will keep throwing their trash on the ground anyway.
Japan has very very few public trash cans , and the place is still tidy because people bring the trash back home with them rather than mess up the streets.
They will also destroy the trash cans and dumpsters, just because they can. The last time the municipal gov installed brand new trash cans around the local gypsy ghetto, multiple have been completely destroyed within a week, and the ones that still worked (weren't literally torn off their mounts) were dented.
Third world mindset is "why empty the trash cans and take the trash to the landfill when I can charge people for taking the trash to the landfill but actually dump it in the river across the street instead?"
Remember when couple years back white Republicans tried to clean up the Baltimore neighborhoods and got angry responses from the blacks because it made them look bad? As shitty as Baltimore is, you can't say they don't have proper infrastructures to deal with the garbages
third world counties are indeed filthy... look at south africa...egypt...New York...California...washington DC...no pride in where you're from has a terrible effect on one's desire to keep it clean...
Its why we prefer not to have a lot of poos here.. if they HAVE to be here, we dont want them to make poo neighborhoods with other poos. We want to show them.. hey. Do what white people or the people that is already here do. Thats why this place is nice.. because we dont do poo shit.
I rented a house for years, and I put alot of time and effort into relandscaping the house, so that I could enjoy a more beautiful house and with the added benefit of the house being more beautiful for the neighborhood after I move out.
Foreigners are like, fucking white people and racism or something
I thought this was going to be a story about how Egypt is a shining example for other countries. Trying to collect and dispose of garbage is centuries more advanced than some.
This reminds me of when a few years ago I posted a study that there are more indians who have mobile phones than indians who have toilets, and everyone on reddit accused me of being a racist lol lol.
That study was from ages ago so maybe things have changed, but none of the people accusing me of racism were able to show me any new studies either.
Part of this is because the cleaner it gets, the more you stand out as a target for criminals. In these types of countries you are literally rewarded for being as repulsive and unremarkable as possible, making any chance of improvement impossible.
The problem with Egypt that most of its population is concentrated in a small part of the land, due to the rest being inhospitable for human habitation. This small part of the country is also where the arable land of the country is located. That's why Egypt also can't feed itself and is reliant on foreign countries for the import of foodstuffs.
Egypt also had a population explosion due to Islamic birthrates, further compounding the problem.
colonialism is the sole reason "3rd world countries" exist as a concept, without it there would have just been a bunch of tribes constantly at war with each other
Incorrect. Its because of low IQ people, it would still be trash no matter what religion they are. look at majority Christan countries in africa they are still trash
Bullshit cherry picked screenies from a biased video of a particular country by someone who has either not been around the world enough or stepped away from their 'guided' tours to have a look at how actual people live in these worlds.
Dead animals are food and trash is a commodity to the resourceful. Necessity breeds invention. Egypt: The WORST Country I ever Visited - My WARNING to Future Travelers is another Pizza Hut eating, once in a lifetime, traveller who has never travelled sending their thoughts out to a world back home where they think their insights will be wonderous.
Is Cairo a dump? Yup! Is there literally a dump behind the Pyramids? Yup! Has it seen massive social change in the last 6000 years? Sure has!
Hawaii has been settled by humans for around 1000 years, the US annexed it around 130 years ago and it became the 50th state just 65 years ago. Have you ever stepped off the beaten track there?
Both cool places if you know what the cultures are under the veneer but nobody has their house in order properly and so the grass is always greener to those in nice enough gardens.
One thing the thread title has right though is colonialism was the best thing to ever happen to most places with regards to quality of life by global standards. So good, in fact, that reverse colonialism is now a thing.
They wanted independence but now they are flocking to the country that colonized them. Interesting. Also, I really hate the term “colonialism”. Just another term whiny young people throw around. They can’t seem to shut up about things they never experienced
It is young people and it is guilt at their own having while others don't.
Rather than do the pious thing and give away all their possessions and live a life of poverty though they'd rather attack everyone who makes the reason that anyone has anything, and that's the reason why people want to be near them, in some perverted sense of being able to fix a system which has gone on before they can imagine and will go on well after they're forgotten.
Still, do what you feel is right and help when and where you can without putting yourself in any trouble.
Sounds like you are a 3rd worlder that got offended by my post. Cry about it . In the first place that town in your article still isn't as filthy as the picture above and also how exactly do you figure that its a 100% White neighbourhood anyways?
Dublin is the capital city of Ireland(the city of the suburb you pointed out). And like all capital cites its the most globalist and open to foreigners. And like all capital cities in Europe , its the worst city of the country. Of course it would be the worst city in Ireland. It just further proves that foreigners make more mess.
I was more hoping for people to see that these nigger kikes don't import more wetbacks to do a woman's work. But I suppose it's all about who you ask these days?
Swap the entire populations of Sweden and Egypt, and in less than a generation Egypt would be a paradise, and Sweden would look like a shithole.
3rd world countries are the shitholes they are because 3rd world people live there. Race is measurable, quantifiable, and observable in the wild. Blank slate theory of human development is just so much garbage.
its funny when people say "a country is safe" or "a country is not safe"
its not the country, its the PEOPLE of the country that are safe people to be around. Or the PEOPLE of that country who are not safe to be around.
Are you sure? I'm pretty sure Australia would remain very unsafe regardless of who lives there.
Have you seen their spiders? 🤣
The spiders aren't that big an issue - you get used to them around the house and garden. The snakes surprise you sometimes in the backyard though!
It's not the snakes in the backyard that'll get ya, though, it's the ones in public office.
True.
And I think the Swamps of the American South would be both gross, smelly and unsafe biologically speaking (disease) even if we removed the nigger population from it.
Heck you can't even remove it, as doing so is why New Orleans is literally sinking under sea level.
You can remove it, you just can't remove it willy-nilly.
New Orleans is loose dirt and maneure piled on bogland, then heavy buildings heaped on top.
Dirt... erodes and sinks and settles. Rocks, concrete, cement... You can turn a swamp into what would effectively be in geology terms a sedimentary extrusion of igneous-based conglomerate, using enough construction material. Dig deeper than the bog-dirt, right to bedrock, and then fill with stone. Dam the incoming water sources, too.
Perfectly possible. Just expensive, and would require foresight and significant advanced planning.
They had to deal with aborigines for thousands of years. They're excused.
This! This is also why throwing money at homelessness doesn't solve it.
I tell people that you can round up all the homeless people in a major city, house them in luxury high-rise apartments where food is delivered to them, laundry is done for them, and they have all the movies, video games, and other entertainment they could want for free, and the place look like something out of Mad Max within a week. It's not an affluence problem, it's a people problem.
America was carved out of the wilderness with handmade tools and has a climate much more harsh than these tropical shit holes. Whatever misfortune they may have isn't any worse than the challenges that Western nations had and overcame. The reason they lag so far behind is because the people there are lesser.
It is a callous but true statement that, if you kill off all non-successful humans in a city every winter just from the cold, there's not going to be many non-successful humans in that city.
We want to take care of our disadvantaged and the least of us. But that simple statement of fact stands: Homeless who are homeless for more than a year are a finite population that grows fairly slowly over time, and contracts pretty much only with their deaths. Very few homeless who've been unable to climb back after a year, overall, climb back ever again. Some do, but statistically negligible.
Every effort to long-term "sustain" the homeless, is analogous to an effort to increase the overall numbers of homeless. It would benefit "the homeless" as a class more to spend money on cops to kill drug traffickers, than to overnight-house the homeless, because it will stop future homeless from existing in the first place.
Wait, that sounds kind of... awesome? Trade harsh winters for tropical paradise. The cold would help them build character, while they're too busy fighting the weather to fight each other.
Control of the Suez Canal too. Egyptian "port authorities" constantly extort fees and even goods from vessels which are mostly owned by smaller countries that can't retaliate.
https://archive.is/EaW2B
https://archive.is/vrz8n
No, it would not, Egypt would look like a matriarchal hellhole, your average swede is a 80 iq low testosterone faggot who entirely depends on his nanny state, all the smart swedes have left the country a century ago.
The reason is simple, all of these countries are weak in thinking about logistics. They don't think about how to source something, how it will be transported and finally what to do after they are finished.
The reason European empires of old and the current US military is so powerful is because of their logistical capacity. These countries just care about having a thing so cut corners leading to inferior products and waste everywhere.
Inability to understand abstract ideas like predicting and planning for the future is common for low iq races
Forget which anthropologist it was but he lived with the Zulu for a while and reported that they didn't even HAVE words for the extended future. They had the immediate and "tomorrow" but that was it.
When will you next wake up? Tomorrow When will you gather more food? Tomorrow When will the rain come? Tomorrow When will that tree be fully grown? Tomorrow
https://www.amren.com/news/2017/10/morality-racial-differences/
Damn good pull.
I forgot that's the article that put me onto "the written word is more important than the wheel" idea in terms of cultural power.
That's what I'm implying as in developed countries we do this at a micro and macro level.
In a micro level, we put trash in the bin to ensure we don't end up with pests or trip hazards
Macro, we ensure there's properly maintained landfill or disposal facilities to get rid of trash. It's why you can drink tap water in most of the West and bottled water is a requirement in the third world.
their government simply needs to invest in proper waste management. designated landfills, garbage trucks and infrastructure, training.
they won't because they're too busy fighting civil wars or being so corrupt that they cause a civil war.
you don't even need the government to do that. The neighbourhood can do that. Some indian group that wanted to tidy up india to their credit and said that it wasn't just the government that was the problem, it was the people, that's why Little India is the filthiest town in Singapore despite Singapore being one of the cleanest countries in the world.
And this exact mentality that causes them to make filthy towns is also why they are 3rd worlders.
People who have not been to Singapore will not understand just how fucking stark the difference is when you are in Little India versus the rest of Singapore.
Yishun, which is supposedly the ghetto of Singapore, is better than most first world countries AND looks better than any area of Little India.
There is even a weird ass grime on the BUILDINGS of Little India! Like how?
Probably kitchen exhaust vented directly outside with no grease filters. But hey, the authentic ethnic yum-yums are #WorthIt.
Doesn't matter what the government invests in when the people have 3rd world mindsets. Install all the designated trash cans and dumpsters you want, those savages will keep throwing their trash on the ground anyway.
Japan has very very few public trash cans , and the place is still tidy because people bring the trash back home with them rather than mess up the streets.
They will also destroy the trash cans and dumpsters, just because they can. The last time the municipal gov installed brand new trash cans around the local gypsy ghetto, multiple have been completely destroyed within a week, and the ones that still worked (weren't literally torn off their mounts) were dented.
Third world mindset is "why empty the trash cans and take the trash to the landfill when I can charge people for taking the trash to the landfill but actually dump it in the river across the street instead?"
Remember when couple years back white Republicans tried to clean up the Baltimore neighborhoods and got angry responses from the blacks because it made them look bad? As shitty as Baltimore is, you can't say they don't have proper infrastructures to deal with the garbages
Sure I can. Residents are part of the infrastructure.
Is ''defective farming equipment'' too edgy for a joke?
No, but it is inaccurate. Farming equipment can be repaired.
The idea of why you might want designated landfills simply doesn't occur to people under a certain IQ threshold.
So you're on your way to superpower country if you have designated shitting streets.
third world counties are indeed filthy... look at south africa...egypt...New York...California...washington DC...no pride in where you're from has a terrible effect on one's desire to keep it clean...
Its why we prefer not to have a lot of poos here.. if they HAVE to be here, we dont want them to make poo neighborhoods with other poos. We want to show them.. hey. Do what white people or the people that is already here do. Thats why this place is nice.. because we dont do poo shit.
Filth is a choice
I rented a house for years, and I put alot of time and effort into relandscaping the house, so that I could enjoy a more beautiful house and with the added benefit of the house being more beautiful for the neighborhood after I move out.
Foreigners are like, fucking white people and racism or something
I thought this was going to be a story about how Egypt is a shining example for other countries. Trying to collect and dispose of garbage is centuries more advanced than some.
This reminds me of when a few years ago I posted a study that there are more indians who have mobile phones than indians who have toilets, and everyone on reddit accused me of being a racist lol lol.
That study was from ages ago so maybe things have changed, but none of the people accusing me of racism were able to show me any new studies either.
Part of this is because the cleaner it gets, the more you stand out as a target for criminals. In these types of countries you are literally rewarded for being as repulsive and unremarkable as possible, making any chance of improvement impossible.
The problem with Egypt that most of its population is concentrated in a small part of the land, due to the rest being inhospitable for human habitation. This small part of the country is also where the arable land of the country is located. That's why Egypt also can't feed itself and is reliant on foreign countries for the import of foodstuffs.
Egypt also had a population explosion due to Islamic birthrates, further compounding the problem.
colonialism is the sole reason "3rd world countries" exist as a concept, without it there would have just been a bunch of tribes constantly at war with each other
Egypt is like that because of Islam.
Incorrect. Its because of low IQ people, it would still be trash no matter what religion they are. look at majority Christan countries in africa they are still trash
Bullshit cherry picked screenies from a biased video of a particular country by someone who has either not been around the world enough or stepped away from their 'guided' tours to have a look at how actual people live in these worlds.
Dead animals are food and trash is a commodity to the resourceful. Necessity breeds invention. Egypt: The WORST Country I ever Visited - My WARNING to Future Travelers is another Pizza Hut eating, once in a lifetime, traveller who has never travelled sending their thoughts out to a world back home where they think their insights will be wonderous.
Is Cairo a dump? Yup! Is there literally a dump behind the Pyramids? Yup! Has it seen massive social change in the last 6000 years? Sure has!
Hawaii has been settled by humans for around 1000 years, the US annexed it around 130 years ago and it became the 50th state just 65 years ago. Have you ever stepped off the beaten track there?
Both cool places if you know what the cultures are under the veneer but nobody has their house in order properly and so the grass is always greener to those in nice enough gardens.
One thing the thread title has right though is colonialism was the best thing to ever happen to most places with regards to quality of life by global standards. So good, in fact, that reverse colonialism is now a thing.
They wanted independence but now they are flocking to the country that colonized them. Interesting. Also, I really hate the term “colonialism”. Just another term whiny young people throw around. They can’t seem to shut up about things they never experienced
It is young people and it is guilt at their own having while others don't.
Rather than do the pious thing and give away all their possessions and live a life of poverty though they'd rather attack everyone who makes the reason that anyone has anything, and that's the reason why people want to be near them, in some perverted sense of being able to fix a system which has gone on before they can imagine and will go on well after they're forgotten.
Still, do what you feel is right and help when and where you can without putting yourself in any trouble.
Show me a 100% White neighbourhood that is as filthy as this. Oh wait you can't because White neighbourhoods are never this filthy
Knock yourself out and there's plenty more.
Sounds like you are a 3rd worlder that got offended by my post. Cry about it . In the first place that town in your article still isn't as filthy as the picture above and also how exactly do you figure that its a 100% White neighbourhood anyways?
https://ugeo.urbistat.com/AdminStat/en/ie/demografia/dati-sintesi/ballymun/102/4
13% foreigners, so it has to be at least 20% shitskins
Sounds like you are making assumptions about me based on nothing but that feeble wit of yours.
Depends what you mean by 100% white?
ok 3rd worlder.
Ain't nothing but a thang top kike!
Pick a random spot on Ireland on Google map and a random spot on India, the results are not the same.
I wasn't asked to do that. I was asked to pick a place where white people lived and show it to be as filthy as what was shown in the OP.
He asked for 100 % white
Yes. I can read. Thank you for specifying though.
The best I can make of this is that you can state that the 13% foreigners you pointed out earlier aren't white.
Can you do that?
Dublin isn't famous for importing white people, https://dublin.ie/live/relocating-to-dublin/diverse-community/
Dublin is the capital city of Ireland(the city of the suburb you pointed out). And like all capital cites its the most globalist and open to foreigners. And like all capital cities in Europe , its the worst city of the country. Of course it would be the worst city in Ireland. It just further proves that foreigners make more mess.
https://ugeo.urbistat.com/AdminStat/en/ie/demografia/dati-sintesi/ballymun/102/4 13% foreigners
Thanks for the 2016 demographics of that region!
13% foreigners, yes. I'm not quite getting why you feel that is relevant to this particular discussion though.
Are you going to ask for a peer-reviewed study from the University of Reddit that shows non-whites litter more?
I was more hoping for people to see that these nigger kikes don't import more wetbacks to do a woman's work. But I suppose it's all about who you ask these days?
Please take your meds