Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

64
Everything falls… (www.forbes.com)
posted 1 year ago by FartFag5000 1 year ago by FartFag5000 +64 / -0
Sony May Be Buying FromSoftware’s Parent Company, Says Report
ony is in talks to acquire Kadokawa, the parent company of FromSoftware which is the developer of games like Elden Ring and Dark Souls.
www.forbes.com
37 comments share
37 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (37)
sorted by:
▲ 19 ▼
– Norenia 19 points 1 year ago +19 / -0

It looks like it's even worse- Kadokawa itself has made a statement of intent to have Sony buy them, supposedly to make sure they aren't bought out by a certain other company.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0

Can these companies not just say "no thanks, we'll just keep operating as our own company."?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 26 ▼
– Hullohoomans 26 points 1 year ago +26 / -0

Not under modern capitalism. It's their fiduciary responsibility to acquire maximum profits for their share holders, even if that means getting bought out by someone they know will kill the company and all future profits.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 9 points 1 year ago +9 / -0

That seems like it goes against their duty to yield maximum profits.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– Adamrises 19 points 1 year ago +19 / -0

Shareholder responsibilities require constant "line go up" at all times. Making a decision that doesn't make line go up immediately will usually have them lose their shit, even if its a better long term choice that would make them more money.

Its why most corporations are constantly fucking around with shit that already works and destroying their futures.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 14 points 1 year ago +14 / -0

This is an incredibly perverse system of incentives that ought to be dropped. How does one go about utterly destroying the stock market?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– Grant_us_eyes 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0

Either total governmental collapse by this point or a complete purge from the bottom up of the current group-think of economists running everything in the background.

The Fed will literally lose it's goddamn mind over the notion of us having a depression and do everything in it's power to prevent that.

Oh, and likely [REDACTING] anyone and everyone who has a MBA or listens to thier advise.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– undecidedmask2 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

Reverse this terrible verdict: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_v._Ford_Motor_Co.#:~:text=Article-,Dodge%20v.,of%20his%20employees%20or%20customers.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– powerneed 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

100% one of the worst moments in the timeline 2nd maybe only to removal of the gold standard

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– el_hoovy 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

this didn't happen by itself. people with names and addresses made it happen.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– lapalapa 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

The solution is for new companies never to enter the shareholder market.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Grumman 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Shareholder responsibilities require that you put the best interests of the shareholder first, but that's not supposed to mean you have to stick your head into every mousetrap you find along the way. If companies are being sued for not making shortsighted, self-destructive decisions that is a corruption of the intent behind the rule.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Adamrises 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

That is true, but the issues arises when you are forced because the shareholders themselves demanding you stick your head into a trap because they want that short term gain. Because they, or at least the board representing them, are doing more than just throwing money at it, its also their opinions and beliefs.

You may try to explain it to them, but its not always going to work. Because most of them will be the force behind things like "a new study from Harvard says more blacks equals more money, hire more blacks immediately" and anything otherwise is racism to get you ousted from the company.

Its the "out of state landlord" problem. When someone has a lot of money invested in something, but has no actual investment mentally about it otherwise. So all they care about is the money flowing, even if less money now means more later.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Hardcore_Facestab 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

I saw an article around the 2000s ish about some shareholder suing microsoft. Because the 8 billion research budget could be "better" used on shareholder payouts...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– HallucinatoryBeing 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

The only public company I've seen that tries to combat stupid normies and gambling degenerates from fucking with its operations is Berkshire Hathaway. Warren Buffet made its Class A stock obscenely expensive (currently at $723,549.00 a share) so people who buy the stock would be long-term investors and have some skin in the game, and not just YOLO.

That said, Buffet did create Class B shares for normies to get in, but with drastically lower voting power (1/10,000th of Class A).

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 6 ▼
– SR388-SAX 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

Is FromSoft a publicly traded company?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Hullohoomans 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Good question. Doesn't look like it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Unfortunately, I can think of several companies WORSE than Sony to be owned by so this might be better the devil you know than don't situation.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– Lurker404 15 points 1 year ago +15 / -0

Considering how Sony has become more Westernized, i.e. woke, that's concerning enough. It ain't no Netflix or Amazon but the trend is there.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Hullohoomans 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

You know Sony was originally an American company, right?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– Lurker404 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0

Doesn't sound like it was: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony#History

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Oranguchan 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

You might be thinking of Sega.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Hullohoomans 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Yeah probably

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Raos044 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

For the longest time I thought From was owned by Bamco.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– OBRIENMUSTSUFFER 14 points 1 year ago +14 / -0

Well, it was fun while it lasted. At least Elden Ring was a pretty good game to go out on. Maybe Miyazaki can start his own studio, I’d hate for him to have to see the inevitable Biowarification that’s to follow.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Adamrises 10 points 1 year ago +10 / -0

They can buy the company, but the company has already proven once that its incapable of making a good game without Miyazaki himself. Dark Souls 2 is a meme of a joke for a reason.

So if they fuck around too hard and press a man who would get paid massively to jump to anywhere else, they will just Konami/Kojima the entire franchise and end up making a shadow of what they want.

Also, personal opinion but, Elden Ring showed the genre is on its last legs. Its pumped full of things that would be found in a bad Soulsclone game instead of a legitimate game by the man himself. Empty exploration, hugely bloated stats, and bosses designed to troll you because "le hard!" Really feels like they are running out of ideas to make the formula work again.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AbleistSL 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

They will just Konami/Kojima the entire franchise and end up making a shadow of what they want.

Metal Gear is a dead franchise at this point, all they can do is port all their games like MGS4 to multiplatform and that's it.

Only Kojima would want it at this point, just to preserve the IP from fuckery by squatting it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Adamrises 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Exactly. Konami tried to keep going and instantly fell on their face. All they have left is porting and "remaking" the classics to modern levels, which is working decently but is going to run out soon. While Kojima seems to be happily doing whatever the fuck he wants and making a shit ton of money/connections doing it (even if the product is iffy).

From is in a worse position if they lose Miyazaki. All the Souls games are readily available and most are PC already. The Demon's Souls well is tapped and Bloodborne is the white whale left. The games are far too new for a "remaster/remake" to make much money (since unlike DS1, the online works on all of them). They have a catalogue of non-Souls games to draw from, but we know Sony isn't interested in that.

So they'd end up with the B-team who made Dark Souls 2, hoping they don't botch it this time and also make something better than Elden Ring. While Miyazaki would be snatched by literally any company he wanted.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– voidposter 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

F

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Shill4Hire 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Bearer, seek seek lest.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– LastRights 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

That game also had George R.R. Martin as a promotional vehicle. Martin being a woke-flake from beginning to end.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– 8BitArchitect 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

The game wasn't gay

The DLC kinda was.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– nuggetpatrol 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Welp. That makes me sad.

Looks like it's DEI flavored PSN required log ins from here on out boys.

[Shape Metal Alloy quietly fades out]

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy