Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

143
When you see ppl like this involved with a game, you know it's going to be shit (media.kotakuinaction2.win)
posted 1 year ago by evilplushie 1 year ago by evilplushie +143 / -0
38 comments download share
38 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (38)
sorted by:
▲ 54 ▼
– ApparentlyImAHeretic 54 points 1 year ago +54 / -0

replies locked

cowards

permalink save report block reply
▲ 52 ▼
– aloha_snackbar22 52 points 1 year ago +52 / -0

Elon needs to remove that shit.

If you post shit publicly, you shouldn't be able to restrict who can reply.

This shit pisses me off, specially when governmental agencies do it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 27 ▼
– SturmMilfEnthusiast 27 points 1 year ago +27 / -0

I lost any confidence I had in Elon when he backed off from removing the "block" feature. Twitter blocking is not blocking, it's banning, and, yes, you should not be able to ban people from public posts.

For the record, Bluesky (built by the now-burned useful idiots fired from Twitter) describes the ability to disable comments as a "safety" feature. I think we take for granted just how few people recognize that word as a euphemism at this point.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AccountWasFree 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

The fact there is a distinction between blocking and muting is criminal. It should be solely the same thing.

Because I'm fine if you don't want to listen to certain responses. It's not fine to simply be able to prevent anyone from responding to you bullshit.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Jack 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

Need to have a button called Side Tweet where you can reply and comment as usual only thing is the OP can't read it, when they click it will give them a passive aggressive response that these comments are blocked to them for emotional protection purposes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MLGS 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Our guys should be able to block leftists, leftists should have to endure unlimited slurs, death threats, and doxxing from our guys.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– Kienan 13 points 1 year ago +13 / -0

And they still got ripped hard before they locked them. Amazing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 25 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 25 points 1 year ago +25 / -0

Physiognomy is real.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 21 points 1 year ago +21 / -0

Trying to look back to make sure I'm not rose tinting my memory, was coloured hair EVER attached to attractive women or was that exclusively Goths, Punks and Emos with only jet black hair or green hair?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 32 ▼
– Kienan 32 points 1 year ago +32 / -0

...only jet black hair or green hair?

They did a few other colors, but yeah, I think it was mostly goths pulling it off. Dark blues and such were in their wheelhouse too. Also, rare, but could be pretty dang cool; white/silver hair. Weird but really cool look, when done well. Also, barely counts since it's just an exaggerated natural color, but I've seen bright red look good too.

Nowadays dyed hair is reserved for the freaks, though, and not the sorta cool edgy freaks...who barely even seem to exist nowadays, and who probably want to distance themselves from these other freaks as much as possible. They probably wear suits and ties now or something.

It's astonished me for years, but it's just wild that one of the big young people fashion trends is to make yourself as ugly and unfeminine/unmasculine as possible. Androgynous ugly is a massively popular look for young people. It's insane.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– MegoThor 20 points 1 year ago +20 / -0

Most of these land whales realize they will never look good, so they put all their effort into trying to look bad so that at least people will notice them.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– FromTheShadows 13 points 1 year ago +13 / -0

They also want to encourage everyone, including those with good genes and/or a willingness to stay in good health, to look just as wretched as they are. When everyone's ugly, then no one is.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Kini42 10 points 1 year ago +10 / -0

You sort of described communism perfectly…

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Kienan 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

I wish it was that simple, but I don't think it is. That's a part of it, but it really does seem to be deemed virtuous to look androgynous.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– MegoThor 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Lefties don’t care about virtues.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Kienan 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

But they care about signaling virtues a whole damn lot.

They're the Good Guys, remember?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– AlfredicEnglishRules 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

Bright colors were used for Pink Goths who used cuteness and Victorian clothing at the same time.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– Benevolentdictator 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0

In the mental health world, a woman entering the an exam room with brightly colored hair is essentially a diagnosis of Bipolar disorder without any further evaluation needed.

Or at least it was before full blown Clown World.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Adamrises 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

All the "red flags" like colored hair and tattoos and piercings we talk about now were once attached to attractive women, but part of what made it attractive was it signifying rebellion, taboo, and all sorts of societal norm breaking. That's pretty normal to be attracted to, especially for men as it usually meant that girl would fuck you like no other.

Now, just like back then, its used by women to constantly chase not hating themselves for 5 minutes that day, because that's always the reason it happens. But because you can't get that "fuck you I'm unique and non-comformist" feels off it because everyone is doing it, they now need to compensate with doing more of it and more often.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– ModsAreAIDS 14 points 1 year ago +14 / -0

Tattoos have only ever been attached to trashy women. Their attractiveness wasn't relevant.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Adamrises 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Well duh, if she is getting tattoos she already has all the prerequisite mental illnesses and low standards that usually create a trashy person.

And it used to be a clear sign she was "not like other girls," which often meant being easy to get wild sex from, would drink/smoke with you, and all sorts of other greener grass ideas that guys fantasized about back in the day.

Now that its become mainstream its both become blase, losing that taboo appeal, and we can openly see it means none of those things.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– TheAnon 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

It was specifically ones who were already hot and put effort into their appearance. They'd've been hot no matter what color their hair or what clothes (if any) they wore.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Kaarous 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

And paint huffers.

permalink parent save report block reply
View 2 more comments
▲ 16 ▼
– evilplushie [S] 16 points 1 year ago +16 / -0

https://x.com/talesoftheshire/status/1834604216398078108?t=rsvYuPetSoICR0QRA1qKxA&s=19

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– deleted 10 points 1 year ago +10 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– Gizortnik 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

The destroyers of the shire want to take the shire from the people of the shire, and use it for their own enjoyment.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

There is a reason the scouring of the shire in particular was cut from Peter Jackson movies. Some of the stuff, they brought back like Bombadil in the hobbit.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– deleted 12 points 1 year ago +12 / -0
▲ 11 ▼
– Gizortnik 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0

Big Red, meet Big Pink

"Shut the fuck up, fuckface"

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– RoulerBleu 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Big Red

Obligatory Big Red Remix : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpNapJK1uMg

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Impishdesire 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

I'd have thought that was a fictional person with A.I. art or something if I didn't watch the video

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– MLGS 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

AI generators almost exclusively generate attractive women.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Filo76 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

“What we need are some black female hobbits” said no one on Earth except one person.

The person:

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– alucard13mmfmj 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Why do western women make ugly ass games? While east asian women make visually spectacular, eye orgasm games?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CaptainZebideeBoing 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I just want to say. The title and picture of this post is inimitable in its perfection and truth.

permalink save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy