I've seen studies that say over 30% of white people at colleges like MIT or Harvard are of Jewish (specifically Ashkenazi Jewish) heritage. I don't mean any hate to them with this comment, just that it is a striking figure given they're ~2% of the US population.
Why would it be striking though? Asians make up 7.5% of the population and are now 47% of incoming freshman. Perchance the jewish and asian demographics actually score higher on placement tests and have disproportionate academic achievement.
This video is pretty lacking. I see the attempted debunking of what is, effectively, a single source of 'meh' data. Whereas, we actually have multiple sources over a long period of time studying the IQ of jews, including going back to the time when most jews in the US were below the average IQ of whites due to them being recent immigrant populations, and generally younger.
In fact, a portion of the video is dedicated to the acknowledgement that a non-normal distribution of IQ could lead to a population having lower average IQ, that legitimately has a higher number of geniuses; which undermines the whole argument. You might be asking me to concede that "okay, jews have a lower IQ on average, but due to the non-normal distribution of jewish IQ, then this means the disproportionate number of jews is correct." Which, I mean, if you want to try and make that argument you can.
Overall, the silliest thing he does is break down possible explanations for higher jewish IQ and then treats them as fully distinct and unrelated hypothesis, rather than a multi-variable explanation. Jews going into intellectual work, and jews emphasizing reading, are purely distinct ideas that don't overlap; or, is it possible that the combination of these factors has an effect?
There's really not enough here to say that jews having high IQ is a myth, especially when the original conversation doesn't even include jews as a broken-down demographic.
I mean, if we're trying to do anything to/for you, it's to make you understand that, as Hitler said, jews subvert and destroy nations.
Their 20th century American bid involved targeting the educational system. You claim to not be a jew, so you probably understand that most Aryans, such as myself, spent about 0 seconds studying anything school-related. Some of the wealthier ones might have got to 30min/day (weekdays only). We lived very 'normal' lives, that had little to do with 'education'. It's why we're creative.
Then, we're 'competing' with jews who literally, and by their own admission, basically did nothing but study. Hours a day! Like, the average jew in the 80s had studied more by the age of six than anybody I know did until at least 18 years old.
So... no, obviously jews don't have a higher concentration of 'geniuses'. They just targeted systems and told us what geniuses are. 'Einstein is a genuis!!!' Right, then why didn't he understand that the Riemannian curvature is the natural analog for the 2nd derivate in Newton's equations. Oh... he had to go to the Aryan Hilbert to have that explained to him. Quelle genie!!!
You can think this through for yourself. You just have to stop thinking that us 'stormfags' 'hate all jews'. Nah, I know plenty of jews, and they're fine. I just wish they'd stop lying about their alleged 'talents'.
Your not fucking Aryan. Go actually read what your Nazi friends wrote. You're not a 20 foot tall frost giant of a hyperborean civilization that founded Atlantis. At best, you're probably what you'd call: "An Amerimutt"
It's why we're creative.
When I call you a faggot, it's not because you're a stormfag. I'm calling you a faggot because you're a retarded, smug, self-righteous redditor. This takes me back to the old "Top Minds" level bullshit from back in the day.
Right, then why didn't he understand that the Riemannian curvature is the natural analog for the 2nd derivate in Newton's equations.
Oh fuck, you really are a full blown redditor.
Yes, Einstein did know basic calculus. Einstein was good at math. Everyone agrees that he was outstanding at math, even in school. The idea of him not being good at math is an old wives tale made to help students getting C's in math feel better about themselves.
You can think this through for yourself. You just have to stop thinking that us 'stormfags' 'hate all jews'. Nah, I know plenty of jews, and they're fine. I just wish they'd stop lying about their alleged 'talents'.
Jesus fucking Christ, you're even doing the redditor thing of: "mmmm, I'm actually a sophisticated and unemotional intellectual."
I don't even necessarily disagree with that. But that's one of the reasons I wouldn't expect it to match any IQ sampling. Even if it were of only a single demographic, the selection would be class based even more than merit.
Considering that schools were straight up saying that they were going to just find other ways to do it anyway after the SC ruling, anyone who thinks it isn't still happening is naive.
Just like with every other racialist program, there's going to be "true believers" that are literally going to use every bureaucratic weapon at their disposal to make sure it doesn't end.
There's probably recruiters at MIT that now straight refuse to talk to Asians and Whites at this point, specifically because they believe they need to correct the schools policy against the actions of the court.
That could be an artifact of kids who have a high performance relative to their classmates at shit schools.
Also scholarship availability. Jamal and Timmy both get in. People fall over themselves to give Jamal a free ride. Timmy would have to pay out of pocket and settles for a cheaper college. The chart isn't students accepted. It's the actual incoming class.
This is the right answer. Texas has something similar where they automatically admit the top 10% of high school students. Note this can either be from all-White schools where 100% of them are going to college or all-Minority schools where only that 10% is going to college.
Why would a single school's freshman class be perfectly reflective of IQ distribution nationally?
Here's the Undergrad population of Montana University:
The enrolled student population at The University of Montana, both undergraduate and graduate, is 69.7% White, 7% Two or More Races, 6.1% Hispanic or Latino, 5.82% Asian, 3.58% American Indian or Alaska Native, 1% Black or African American, and 0.1% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islanders.
Does that look like an IQ distribution, or do you think living in Montana might have something more to do with it?
No, it would get applicants from populations of people who could afford to go to it, and are interested in the technical degree, and who have enough social capital to apply with a real chance to go.
All you are offering up is that it might be more representative, not that it is.
Those grants don't counter and remove the influences of class differences and social preference, I can promise you that. And even then, your argument covers applicants not acceptance.
Even if the process were purely meritocratic, there's no reason it must match IQ distribution. I mean, IQ doesn't even necessarily correspond with Ivy League attendance.
And 37% White.
No commentary needed.
Counting Jews as white, so less than that.
I've seen studies that say over 30% of white people at colleges like MIT or Harvard are of Jewish (specifically Ashkenazi Jewish) heritage. I don't mean any hate to them with this comment, just that it is a striking figure given they're ~2% of the US population.
Now look up ivy league presidents and see how overrepresented jews are there. Nepotism at work among the nose tribe, oy vey!
Why would it be striking though? Asians make up 7.5% of the population and are now 47% of incoming freshman. Perchance the jewish and asian demographics actually score higher on placement tests and have disproportionate academic achievement.
https://youtu.be/stLCurXu0fc?si=l9mZyPWdf8Gr1FfN
High jewish IQ is a myth.
This video is pretty lacking. I see the attempted debunking of what is, effectively, a single source of 'meh' data. Whereas, we actually have multiple sources over a long period of time studying the IQ of jews, including going back to the time when most jews in the US were below the average IQ of whites due to them being recent immigrant populations, and generally younger.
In fact, a portion of the video is dedicated to the acknowledgement that a non-normal distribution of IQ could lead to a population having lower average IQ, that legitimately has a higher number of geniuses; which undermines the whole argument. You might be asking me to concede that "okay, jews have a lower IQ on average, but due to the non-normal distribution of jewish IQ, then this means the disproportionate number of jews is correct." Which, I mean, if you want to try and make that argument you can.
Overall, the silliest thing he does is break down possible explanations for higher jewish IQ and then treats them as fully distinct and unrelated hypothesis, rather than a multi-variable explanation. Jews going into intellectual work, and jews emphasizing reading, are purely distinct ideas that don't overlap; or, is it possible that the combination of these factors has an effect?
There's really not enough here to say that jews having high IQ is a myth, especially when the original conversation doesn't even include jews as a broken-down demographic.
I mean, if we're trying to do anything to/for you, it's to make you understand that, as Hitler said, jews subvert and destroy nations.
Their 20th century American bid involved targeting the educational system. You claim to not be a jew, so you probably understand that most Aryans, such as myself, spent about 0 seconds studying anything school-related. Some of the wealthier ones might have got to 30min/day (weekdays only). We lived very 'normal' lives, that had little to do with 'education'. It's why we're creative.
Then, we're 'competing' with jews who literally, and by their own admission, basically did nothing but study. Hours a day! Like, the average jew in the 80s had studied more by the age of six than anybody I know did until at least 18 years old.
So... no, obviously jews don't have a higher concentration of 'geniuses'. They just targeted systems and told us what geniuses are. 'Einstein is a genuis!!!' Right, then why didn't he understand that the Riemannian curvature is the natural analog for the 2nd derivate in Newton's equations. Oh... he had to go to the Aryan Hilbert to have that explained to him. Quelle genie!!!
You can think this through for yourself. You just have to stop thinking that us 'stormfags' 'hate all jews'. Nah, I know plenty of jews, and they're fine. I just wish they'd stop lying about their alleged 'talents'.
Your not fucking Aryan. Go actually read what your Nazi friends wrote. You're not a 20 foot tall frost giant of a hyperborean civilization that founded Atlantis. At best, you're probably what you'd call: "An Amerimutt"
When I call you a faggot, it's not because you're a stormfag. I'm calling you a faggot because you're a retarded, smug, self-righteous redditor. This takes me back to the old "Top Minds" level bullshit from back in the day.
Oh fuck, you really are a full blown redditor.
Yes, Einstein did know basic calculus. Einstein was good at math. Everyone agrees that he was outstanding at math, even in school. The idea of him not being good at math is an old wives tale made to help students getting C's in math feel better about themselves.
Jesus fucking Christ, you're even doing the redditor thing of: "mmmm, I'm actually a sophisticated and unemotional intellectual."
Nah, the oversampling of Jews has less to do with intelligence and more to do with money.
You absolutely can buy your way into these schools, even if it's indirect.
I don't even necessarily disagree with that. But that's one of the reasons I wouldn't expect it to match any IQ sampling. Even if it were of only a single demographic, the selection would be class based even more than merit.
It's not just about money. You can also put trolling for the IDF on your resume and get extra nepo-points
does being a jew mod on this site count?
i do fuck those nepotistic tunnel diggers
To fill in the obvious missing line from the tweet:
- 3% less White (38% to 37%)
Whites being replaced still... but cheer about muh based Asians. Thank God our campuses are safe for Asians and jews now. Thanks white man!
And that's all that matters.
I do not give a single fuck how many Asians are admitted into university. In White countries, Whites should be the overwhelming majority.
Many people doubt they truly ended Affirmative Action:
https://x.com/eyeslasho/status/1826367330596655495
Considering that schools were straight up saying that they were going to just find other ways to do it anyway after the SC ruling, anyone who thinks it isn't still happening is naive.
Just like with every other racialist program, there's going to be "true believers" that are literally going to use every bureaucratic weapon at their disposal to make sure it doesn't end.
There's probably recruiters at MIT that now straight refuse to talk to Asians and Whites at this point, specifically because they believe they need to correct the schools policy against the actions of the court.
That is what actual systemic racism looks like.
This graph gives me aids.
😂 I didn’t even look at it and now I feel like I’ve had a stroke trying to understand it
In the US, Asians are from Asia, and we do not refer to Muslims as inherently Asian.
The vast and sweeping majority of Asians in the US are: Indian, Chinese, Japanese, and Phillipino.
Typically we would have to try and classify them as ethnically Middle-East/North African
I’m sure they found some loopholes but it seems a sleep in the right direction
MIT is a brand. Tarnish the brand and eliminate the competition.
seems about right
I'll tell you one thing, affirmative action is responsible for labeling the axes on that graph.
Post Reported for: Fuck off, Imp
???
That could be an artifact of kids who have a high performance relative to their classmates at shit schools.
Also scholarship availability. Jamal and Timmy both get in. People fall over themselves to give Jamal a free ride. Timmy would have to pay out of pocket and settles for a cheaper college. The chart isn't students accepted. It's the actual incoming class.
This is the right answer. Texas has something similar where they automatically admit the top 10% of high school students. Note this can either be from all-White schools where 100% of them are going to college or all-Minority schools where only that 10% is going to college.
Why would a single school's freshman class be perfectly reflective of IQ distribution nationally?
Here's the Undergrad population of Montana University:
Does that look like an IQ distribution, or do you think living in Montana might have something more to do with it?
The University of Montana mostly gets applicants and students from Montana.
MIT is an elite school that gets applicants from all over the country. It would obviously be more representative of the national population.
No, it would get applicants from populations of people who could afford to go to it, and are interested in the technical degree, and who have enough social capital to apply with a real chance to go.
From all over the country.
And grants and scholarships are available to "disadvantaged" or "marginalized" students that are unavailable to poor white kids.
It would still be much more representative of the national population than University of Montana.
All you are offering up is that it might be more representative, not that it is.
Those grants don't counter and remove the influences of class differences and social preference, I can promise you that. And even then, your argument covers applicants not acceptance.
Even if the process were purely meritocratic, there's no reason it must match IQ distribution. I mean, IQ doesn't even necessarily correspond with Ivy League attendance.
And you're splitting hairs and comparing it to the University of Montana as if that has any meaning. I guess we'll call it even.
I think it's likely to be more representative, and I guess you don't. Whatever.
Your guess is wrong.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks (x2)
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks