All you are offering up is that it might be more representative, not that it is.
Those grants don't counter and remove the influences of class differences and social preference, I can promise you that. And even then, your argument covers applicants not acceptance.
Even if the process were purely meritocratic, there's no reason it must match IQ distribution. I mean, IQ doesn't even necessarily correspond with Ivy League attendance.
All you are offering up is that it might be more representative, not that it is.
Those grants don't counter and remove the influences of class differences and social preference, I can promise you that. And even then, your argument covers applicants not acceptance.
Even if the process were purely meritocratic, there's no reason it must match IQ distribution. I mean, IQ doesn't even necessarily correspond with Ivy League attendance.
And you're splitting hairs and comparing it to the University of Montana as if that has any meaning. I guess we'll call it even.
I think it's likely to be more representative, and I guess you don't. Whatever.
Your guess is wrong.