It gets better. She was previously in the SS, in charge of guarding Biden during the Obama admin. And was then appointed as director under President Biden. And given an award by President Biden.
If you were wondering how this even happened, it sounds like 1) they didn’t secure the nearest roof and 2) snipers scoped the target before he opened fire. So SS let it happen.
Fair questions. Plus a closer watching shows the rapid and significant repositioning of the counter sniper's weapon, maybe he didn't have shooter in his sights initially. Still, why the fuck was there an unmonitored rooftop 150 yds away?
Taking out a rifle and aiming it at Trump must have taken enough time to know, IMO.
It looks to me like he had him under sights and hesitated. Or waited. He's either too weak for his position or he's the worst case scenario for the SS.
Her current “goal” was increasing the secret service to be 30% female. DEI almost allowed the first presidential assassination since the secret service began protecting presidents.
When the motorcade was backing up and it was all women I immediately knew standards were slipping, then details come out and it turns out they nearly got a president killed over the most basic of oversights.
If I was trying to be sold on life protection, why would I ever choose a woman to take charge? You know, someone who is easily overpowered by 90% of men just based on genetics alone?
The man, 42-year-old Omar J. Gonzalez, ran unobstructed for 70 yards across the front lawn of the White House before entering through the North Portico. On the way, he brushed by a Secret Service officer with a drawn gun, sources tell CBS News’ Bill Plante.
Gonzalez then proceeded to run through the entrance hall to the cross hall of the White House, past the staircase that leads up to the first family’s residence. He was confronted by a female Secret Service agent, who he overpowered and made it all the way to the East Room, Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, told CBS News, citing whistleblowers.
Ahahaha, you just don't stop. Female (appointed by male, awarded by male, previously relationship with male), may have been involved, so it was the Females that did the thing.
At least wait till all the information is out before you start declaring victory. If you're right, you're right. But you look foolish jumping the gun, either way.
Me slightly, only because when Trump gets in so long as his God armour holds, he'll have the legitimacy to go full order 66 on the establishment after the attempted hit.
I don't mind restraining myself for now if I can see the establishment loose their toys in a few months..
I'm sorry, but missing a rooftop with clear sight line and ignoring concern from the public about it screams malice.
She almost certainly wasn't onsite herself. Plenty of highly trained men were. If SS agents were in on it, it almost certainly goes higher than the SS itself. She may have been in on it, but she wasn't the lead. Come on.
Look, we've had this discussion multiple times. I don't dislike you, I think you have some very valid points, but you always, always, always take it to absurd lengths and torpedo your own cause.
If this was a deep state hit, were women involved? Statistically, likely? Were women pulling the strings? Potentially, but nowhere near as likely, and definitely not a certainty. Your unwavering confidence that it's always women just doesn't work.
Please don't ban Imp again, or at least not for months like his last ban. By starting with the conclusion every single time and working backwards, he makes it clear how ridiculous identity politics can get. If anything, he helps all the rest of us think through situations individually and not in terms of stereotypes...if only because, in the back of our minds, we have a little voice saying "That reflex assumption you just made sounds a bit like Imp".
Yeah, sure, a bit. I get that argument. However, I can't make the dude the exception to the rules forever, especially when he knows he can change the comment to rescind the ban, and openly refuses.
It gets better. She was previously in the SS, in charge of guarding Biden during the Obama admin. And was then appointed as director under President Biden. And given an award by President Biden.
In any other field, it would be a conflict of interest.
Honestly it's possible this was some sort of payoff. Super weird.
Welcome back!
If you were wondering how this even happened, it sounds like 1) they didn’t secure the nearest roof and 2) snipers scoped the target before he opened fire. So SS let it happen.
Here is the SS counter sniper hesitating
Devils advocate:
Fair questions. Plus a closer watching shows the rapid and significant repositioning of the counter sniper's weapon, maybe he didn't have shooter in his sights initially. Still, why the fuck was there an unmonitored rooftop 150 yds away?
I doubt he was able to reposition and fire accurately within 1-2 seconds.
nah, it's easily doable. Especially on a tripod like that. source: I shoot a lot.
Taking out a rifle and aiming it at Trump must have taken enough time to know, IMO.
It looks to me like he had him under sights and hesitated. Or waited. He's either too weak for his position or he's the worst case scenario for the SS.
Her current “goal” was increasing the secret service to be 30% female. DEI almost allowed the first presidential assassination since the secret service began protecting presidents.
When the motorcade was backing up and it was all women I immediately knew standards were slipping, then details come out and it turns out they nearly got a president killed over the most basic of oversights.
How about both? Because when you are sufficiently incompetent, there is no difference.
If I was trying to be sold on life protection, why would I ever choose a woman to take charge? You know, someone who is easily overpowered by 90% of men just based on genetics alone?
Relevant incident from 10 years ago:
https://www.unz.com/isteve/female-secret-service-agents-arent-actually-hollywood-style-buttkicking-babes/
Thank God the high-fructose corn syrup was unharmed.
So she wants more women to be shot and killed [in the line of duty]? Sounds misogynistic to me. 🤡
This bitch was guarding cheetos.
He literally would have been safer if she were a 250lbs ham planet.
Ahahaha, you just don't stop. Female (appointed by male, awarded by male, previously relationship with male), may have been involved, so it was the Females that did the thing.
At least wait till all the information is out before you start declaring victory. If you're right, you're right. But you look foolish jumping the gun, either way.
At the very least he's not claiming how this woman is a slut for not giving birth in her teens. Man those pajeets were annoying
Can't argue with that. He's still being annoying and incorrect, though.
Who cares?
Me slightly, only because when Trump gets in so long as his God armour holds, he'll have the legitimacy to go full order 66 on the establishment after the attempted hit.
I don't mind restraining myself for now if I can see the establishment loose their toys in a few months..
Yeah pajeet, we see you.
If he did that then he would never be able to declare victory.
She almost certainly wasn't onsite herself. Plenty of highly trained men were. If SS agents were in on it, it almost certainly goes higher than the SS itself. She may have been in on it, but she wasn't the lead. Come on.
Look, we've had this discussion multiple times. I don't dislike you, I think you have some very valid points, but you always, always, always take it to absurd lengths and torpedo your own cause.
If this was a deep state hit, were women involved? Statistically, likely? Were women pulling the strings? Potentially, but nowhere near as likely, and definitely not a certainty. Your unwavering confidence that it's always women just doesn't work.
Never thought I'd hear that from you.
You don't have detractors. You have delusions of grandeur and a bunch of random people who get tired of your stupid shit.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
I have no idea what "female backed" is supposed to mean, but this doesn't appear to be a R16 violation.
Please don't ban Imp again, or at least not for months like his last ban. By starting with the conclusion every single time and working backwards, he makes it clear how ridiculous identity politics can get. If anything, he helps all the rest of us think through situations individually and not in terms of stereotypes...if only because, in the back of our minds, we have a little voice saying "That reflex assumption you just made sounds a bit like Imp".
Yeah, sure, a bit. I get that argument. However, I can't make the dude the exception to the rules forever, especially when he knows he can change the comment to rescind the ban, and openly refuses.