I'm sorry, but missing a rooftop with clear sight line and ignoring concern from the public about it screams malice.
She almost certainly wasn't onsite herself. Plenty of highly trained men were. If SS agents were in on it, it almost certainly goes higher than the SS itself. She may have been in on it, but she wasn't the lead. Come on.
Look, we've had this discussion multiple times. I don't dislike you, I think you have some very valid points, but you always, always, always take it to absurd lengths and torpedo your own cause.
If this was a deep state hit, were women involved? Statistically, likely? Were women pulling the strings? Potentially, but nowhere near as likely, and definitely not a certainty. Your unwavering confidence that it's always women just doesn't work.
I never said the men were innocent. I haven't even watched the video. His security detail could have been the Israeli army for all I know. I've just been reading what reportedly happened, and the common theme is Secret Service leadership did not act when they should have. Didn't secure the perimeter, didn't send extra security when the campaign asked, didn't listen to public warnings.
The last two attempted assassinations of President Trump were both radfems, it wasn't a big stretch to call #3. First one was a Canadian who got busted trying to cross the border with a bag full of guns, and sent poison to the WH. Second was the heavily connected feminist woman who planned to kill him in the Bronx but everyone saw her schizo posting on the day. Honestly, my money was on her trying again, because Secret Service never detained her (this makes a lot more sense in hindsight.)
It's a cheap joke at my detractors. I'm sure they're getting their spin ready, they already had a few attempts at it, that didn't sound at all like their feminist masters...
First pictures of the perpetrator are out, I fed them into an AI gender prediction tool, it had 60% confidence in male.
She almost certainly wasn't onsite herself. Plenty of highly trained men were. If SS agents were in on it, it almost certainly goes higher than the SS itself. She may have been in on it, but she wasn't the lead. Come on.
Look, we've had this discussion multiple times. I don't dislike you, I think you have some very valid points, but you always, always, always take it to absurd lengths and torpedo your own cause.
If this was a deep state hit, were women involved? Statistically, likely? Were women pulling the strings? Potentially, but nowhere near as likely, and definitely not a certainty. Your unwavering confidence that it's always women just doesn't work.
I never said she was.
I never said the men were innocent. I haven't even watched the video. His security detail could have been the Israeli army for all I know. I've just been reading what reportedly happened, and the common theme is Secret Service leadership did not act when they should have. Didn't secure the perimeter, didn't send extra security when the campaign asked, didn't listen to public warnings.
The last two attempted assassinations of President Trump were both radfems, it wasn't a big stretch to call #3. First one was a Canadian who got busted trying to cross the border with a bag full of guns, and sent poison to the WH. Second was the heavily connected feminist woman who planned to kill him in the Bronx but everyone saw her schizo posting on the day. Honestly, my money was on her trying again, because Secret Service never detained her (this makes a lot more sense in hindsight.)
Never thought I'd hear that from you.
It's a cheap joke at my detractors. I'm sure they're getting their spin ready, they already had a few attempts at it,
that didn't sound at all like their feminist masters...First pictures of the perpetrator are out, I fed them into an AI gender prediction tool, it had 60% confidence in male.
You don't have detractors. You have delusions of grandeur and a bunch of random people who get tired of your stupid shit.