Considering "sexual assault" can range from meaning absolutely nothing to "absolutely nothing" any allegation levied towards any self identified male feminist comes off as nothing more than his worth being considered as having run out and now other grifters are looking for their own 15 minutes of fame by being the ones who out him, regardless of what did or didn't happen, and whether it did or didn't happen anyway.
That's certainly one interpretation of it all, yes. His usefulness has run out and so it's another head for the trophy wall.
Of course he saw heads prior to his own going up and thought nothing of it apart from "Believe all women" and kept on in his cavorting carousel unawares that his ride has to come to an end at some point too.
So he's either into shady degrading sexual assault and claiming his victims have memory problems or he's innocent of these claims and will have to wait for the next ones to lap up on shore.
I've no idea as to the truth just now but I know who lit the fuse and it has "Neil Gaiman assisted" written all over it and so I'll just enjoy the fireworks and see who in the audience has decided it's time to leave and find a less 'problematic' place to extol their virtues to hungry nymphs who'll soon seek flesh instead of sublimating stories to sate their satirical succour.
I don't know why, but the alliteration is flowing out of me on this one!
Do not ever give any grace or benefit of the doubt to any leftist no matter the circumstances. They would never extend it to you. Assume that Gaiman is a serial rapist until proven otherwise, and he has the burden of proof to prove his innocence.
While I don't like what Neil has become (or always was?) and while I think the precedent of "you made me feel bad in a consentual relationship" is horseshit, I can't help but chuckle as our feminist hero gets dragged through the mud.
Still, 20+ year olds accusing based off fee fees, one who had been sitting quietly on them for over a decade or something, shouldn't be encouraged. He should be ridiculed and ostracized and so should they.
Self admitted feminist, Neil Gaiman...accused of sexual assault
I'm surprised it took this long!
And, no, I'm not even saying he did it. But, if you hang around with scummy feminists, of course you'll get accused of assault sooner or later.
Every time something like this happens, I always say innocent until proven guilty, and that still holds true...but I'm also now finding it hard to be sympathetic. I do still feel some sympathy (I know, I know, my bad guys), as false allegations are pretty high up there on the 'terrible things to happen to you' list...but it's also just so expected, another part of me is going 'duh, of course.'
I've only glanced at it so far, but this looks fake as fuck. Or at least exaggerated as fuck. This looks like one of the most obvious smear pieces ever seen, in fact. This could be used as the definitive example of 'character assassination.' I can even believe he did some not so great stuff, but it seems like they're blowing any actual events way out of proportion to 'get him,' for whatever reason.
The real sign this is bullshit, or at the very least maliciously motivated targeting, is that a bunch of women seem to have all come out at the same time, for a podcast. This is another case of journalists deciding the story beforehand, I'd say. They were calling up anyone who knew Gaiman, and prompting them to say bad stuff, and then ran with that.
I'm sure in retrospect some of these men will understand that they should have backed away from the cause earlier and left the women to look after women-centric issues.
They'll still be lashing out at 'other men' as being vile and all the other sorts of rhetoric which keeps them as smecsy bois who are good to be around, but they'll maybe see that being an ally is only ever temporary in war and that when women are no longer women but birthing people who have to suck the lady cock they might understand that this is an all-out war and that the majority of 'people' are only fodder for the generals at the back on both sides.
Once again I feel like this is why we fail. I don't wanna see him canceled because some groupies revoke consent 30 years later. Whereas If I could just be more tribal, I would join the mob.
Once again I feel like this is why we fail. I don't wanna see him canceled because some groupies revoke consent 30 years later. Whereas If I could just be more tribal, I would join the mob.
We evaluate how Jewish a person is based on three factors. How Jewish they are internally, how Jewish they are externally and how much we want that person to be a Jew in the first place.
They can take away your Jew Score if you're not Jewy enough. It's kind of funny, but really fucking weird. I'm not quite sure the point. There are categories for 'Sadly, a Jew' and "Barely a Jew.'
At a glance it looks like they do actual research, but then the results seem comedic. They also do fictional characters. Darth Vader is 'Sadly, not a Jew,' and Boba Fett is apparently 'Barely a Jew.'
Also, Watto is Not a Jew because "He isn't studious, intelligent, or well-spoken. He neither gives to his community, nor adds anything to the society at large."
Lastly, because they include how much they want someone to be a Jew, someone more Jewish, but who did things that reflect poorly, scores lower than someone less Jewish.
The funniest part is always trying to determine if the people behind something like this are A) autistic weirdos, B) autistic weirdos who love Jews, or C) autistic weirdos who hate Jews.
The funniest part is always trying to determine if the people behind something like this are A) autistic weirdos, B) autistic weirdos who love Jews, or C) autistic weirdos who hate Jews.
Could be all three if there are multiple writers behind that site.
And just like that his world turns upside down and goes inside out. Those slight provocative paranoid perturbations in the periphery become full on inescapable attacking realities which require instinctual reflect to evade lest this be the end of it all for him.
Having been winded by the fifth dimensional tesseract blow of Madeleine L'Engle's further attempts to beat science fiction and fantasy into an accessible question of existence for innocent minds to query he is left asking "Which who whatsit?".
And so once again we have a wolf in sheep's clothing, a man purporting to be a feminist looking out for his sisters, someone open to the idea of practising polygamy while suggesting that his competition in that arena are somehow all inferior feeble-minded irradiated genetic disasters and mistakes to take a chance with, looking for people to find ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat, or at the very least a redemption path, when such thoughts were as far from his mind when it was others, some whom he knew well, who were accused of such things.
Another grandiose peacock who forgot that his tailfeathers shed and their markers tie them directly to him. Easy to spot for those with an eye for such things, but for those new to the game a surprising truth which they've known all along in the darkest recesses of their soul.
Who had "Male feminist who authored a book about a teenage girl who becomes homeless in London because she dropped her reality and has to hang around with egotistical fantasy paraphilics in an effort to save the world" on their bingo card?
How true any of this or is not, it was always going to be in play as it always has been and always will be. The game is now who is next and will anyone question who is doing the hunting?
Who had "Male feminist who authored a book about a teenage girl who becomes homeless in London because she dropped her reality and has to hang around with egotistical fantasy paraphilics in an effort to save the world" on their bingo card?
I mean, that's highly specific, but half the spaces on my bingo card are some variation of "male feminist" so yes it counts.
Whenever I see a man frantically virtue signal for "muh male feminism" I always (always) figure they have pretty epic skeletons ready to escape the closet.
I have some very liberal friends who worked in the comics industry in the 90s and crossed paths him him, they all hate him and say he's a massive cunt.
Apparently he'd do things like bring in his dirty laundry, throw it and people and tell them to go clean it hahaha.
Didnt hear any rumours of sexual assault though.
Woman found prestigious man hot and had consensual sex with him. Later regretted it and spun up a sob story. Tale as old as time. Women's complaints are insincere and should be ridiculed.
the long earth series by him and terry prachett is my favorite series, i dont care about what ever the media brands people, accusing people of sexual assault is like calling someone far right
Apparently there are some pretty damning receipts, both Whatsapp text records and pictures.
Remember, this is a guy who has boasted for years about his open marriage with his wife, and for years people have talked about how he likes to flirt with young women and teenage girls doing his book events. So this is a guy with an established history of depravity to begin with.
Considering "sexual assault" can range from meaning absolutely nothing to "absolutely nothing" any allegation levied towards any self identified male feminist comes off as nothing more than his worth being considered as having run out and now other grifters are looking for their own 15 minutes of fame by being the ones who out him, regardless of what did or didn't happen, and whether it did or didn't happen anyway.
Whether or not he's guilty, this is what he has voted for. Lay down with woke, wake up with sexual assault allegations.
That's certainly one interpretation of it all, yes. His usefulness has run out and so it's another head for the trophy wall.
Of course he saw heads prior to his own going up and thought nothing of it apart from "Believe all women" and kept on in his cavorting carousel unawares that his ride has to come to an end at some point too.
So he's either into shady degrading sexual assault and claiming his victims have memory problems or he's innocent of these claims and will have to wait for the next ones to lap up on shore.
I've no idea as to the truth just now but I know who lit the fuse and it has "Neil Gaiman assisted" written all over it and so I'll just enjoy the fireworks and see who in the audience has decided it's time to leave and find a less 'problematic' place to extol their virtues to hungry nymphs who'll soon seek flesh instead of sublimating stories to sate their satirical succour.
I don't know why, but the alliteration is flowing out of me on this one!
He's rich and famous and people want to cash in on that. That's the reason. That was always the reason.
Then: associating with someone rich and famous in order to get gibs.
Now: throwing someone under the bus who is rich and famous in order to get gibs.
Do not ever give any grace or benefit of the doubt to any leftist no matter the circumstances. They would never extend it to you. Assume that Gaiman is a serial rapist until proven otherwise, and he has the burden of proof to prove his innocence.
And when he has the evidence to prove he didn't do it, don't believe him. He'd do the same.
Until our guys really embrace this kind of stone cold friend/enemy response, things will only get worse.
His work has been shit since he joined Scientology.
Male feminist = "sneaky fucker".
I agree.
They'll come for you, no matter what.
If you're not against them, you will be soon enough.
lol and they have a 4-part paywalled podcast on it by now of course.
Suck it Gaiboi, hope the nasty infected groupie pussy was worth it for helping feminism to infiltrate geek spaces and eventually destroy you.
RE
SET
THE
CLOCK
I already took care of that.
I used the time machine to change how timekeeping works. Now all analog clocks reset at noon and midnight.
It was an effort, I'll tell you. Did you know that timekeeping uses the Sumerian base four counting system? TIL!
While I don't like what Neil has become (or always was?) and while I think the precedent of "you made me feel bad in a consentual relationship" is horseshit, I can't help but chuckle as our feminist hero gets dragged through the mud.
Still, 20+ year olds accusing based off fee fees, one who had been sitting quietly on them for over a decade or something, shouldn't be encouraged. He should be ridiculed and ostracized and so should they.
I'm surprised it took this long!
And, no, I'm not even saying he did it. But, if you hang around with scummy feminists, of course you'll get accused of assault sooner or later.
Every time something like this happens, I always say innocent until proven guilty, and that still holds true...but I'm also now finding it hard to be sympathetic. I do still feel some sympathy (I know, I know, my bad guys), as false allegations are pretty high up there on the 'terrible things to happen to you' list...but it's also just so expected, another part of me is going 'duh, of course.'
I've only glanced at it so far, but this looks fake as fuck. Or at least exaggerated as fuck. This looks like one of the most obvious smear pieces ever seen, in fact. This could be used as the definitive example of 'character assassination.' I can even believe he did some not so great stuff, but it seems like they're blowing any actual events way out of proportion to 'get him,' for whatever reason.
The real sign this is bullshit, or at the very least maliciously motivated targeting, is that a bunch of women seem to have all come out at the same time, for a podcast. This is another case of journalists deciding the story beforehand, I'd say. They were calling up anyone who knew Gaiman, and prompting them to say bad stuff, and then ran with that.
I'm sure in retrospect some of these men will understand that they should have backed away from the cause earlier and left the women to look after women-centric issues.
They'll still be lashing out at 'other men' as being vile and all the other sorts of rhetoric which keeps them as smecsy bois who are good to be around, but they'll maybe see that being an ally is only ever temporary in war and that when women are no longer women but birthing people who have to suck the lady cock they might understand that this is an all-out war and that the majority of 'people' are only fodder for the generals at the back on both sides.
I don't extend innocence until proven guilty to people who don't believe that tenet. They chose the rules they want to play by, they can lose by them.
He is a twat.
Once again I feel like this is why we fail. I don't wanna see him canceled because some groupies revoke consent 30 years later. Whereas If I could just be more tribal, I would join the mob.
I do love seeing him get eaten by his own though.
Correct, this is why we fail.
Male feminists go along with the "men are predators" bullshit because they think every man is like them. They are the predators.
By women no less. I'm quite surprised, I've been calling him Neil Gayman for nearly twenty years.
http://www.jewornotjew.com/profile.jsp?ID=125
LOL.
Also, what a weird site.
They can take away your Jew Score if you're not Jewy enough. It's kind of funny, but really fucking weird. I'm not quite sure the point. There are categories for 'Sadly, a Jew' and "Barely a Jew.'
At a glance it looks like they do actual research, but then the results seem comedic. They also do fictional characters. Darth Vader is 'Sadly, not a Jew,' and Boba Fett is apparently 'Barely a Jew.'
Also, Watto is Not a Jew because "He isn't studious, intelligent, or well-spoken. He neither gives to his community, nor adds anything to the society at large."
Lastly, because they include how much they want someone to be a Jew, someone more Jewish, but who did things that reflect poorly, scores lower than someone less Jewish.
The funniest part is always trying to determine if the people behind something like this are A) autistic weirdos, B) autistic weirdos who love Jews, or C) autistic weirdos who hate Jews.
It can't be C. They'd consider Watto a 10/10 Jew.
Could be all three if there are multiple writers behind that site.
Right after his divorce no less. It's like the feminists who liked his ex wife better decided to destroy him in the way they always use.
And just like that his world turns upside down and goes inside out. Those slight provocative paranoid perturbations in the periphery become full on inescapable attacking realities which require instinctual reflect to evade lest this be the end of it all for him.
Having been winded by the fifth dimensional tesseract blow of Madeleine L'Engle's further attempts to beat science fiction and fantasy into an accessible question of existence for innocent minds to query he is left asking "Which who whatsit?".
And so once again we have a wolf in sheep's clothing, a man purporting to be a feminist looking out for his sisters, someone open to the idea of practising polygamy while suggesting that his competition in that arena are somehow all inferior feeble-minded irradiated genetic disasters and mistakes to take a chance with, looking for people to find ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat, or at the very least a redemption path, when such thoughts were as far from his mind when it was others, some whom he knew well, who were accused of such things.
Another grandiose peacock who forgot that his tailfeathers shed and their markers tie them directly to him. Easy to spot for those with an eye for such things, but for those new to the game a surprising truth which they've known all along in the darkest recesses of their soul.
Who had "Male feminist who authored a book about a teenage girl who becomes homeless in London because she dropped her reality and has to hang around with egotistical fantasy paraphilics in an effort to save the world" on their bingo card?
How true any of this or is not, it was always going to be in play as it always has been and always will be. The game is now who is next and will anyone question who is doing the hunting?
I mean, that's highly specific, but half the spaces on my bingo card are some variation of "male feminist" so yes it counts.
Whenever I see a man frantically virtue signal for "muh male feminism" I always (always) figure they have pretty epic skeletons ready to escape the closet.
I assume "male feminist" equals "rapist".
He’s a male feminist so he doesn’t get the benefit of the doubt on this one I’m afraid.
He was popular with leftist women, so his choices were to catch a false accusation or follow the Pence 24/7 (and still catch a false accusation)
I have some very liberal friends who worked in the comics industry in the 90s and crossed paths him him, they all hate him and say he's a massive cunt. Apparently he'd do things like bring in his dirty laundry, throw it and people and tell them to go clean it hahaha. Didnt hear any rumours of sexual assault though.
Woman found prestigious man hot and had consensual sex with him. Later regretted it and spun up a sob story. Tale as old as time. Women's complaints are insincere and should be ridiculed.
Scratch a male feminist...
male feminists are guilty until proven innocent.
The real shocking part.
the long earth series by him and terry prachett is my favorite series, i dont care about what ever the media brands people, accusing people of sexual assault is like calling someone far right
What if he owned up to the relationship as consensual, one where she's 22 and he was in his 60s?
I mean I personally would give him a high five but he wouldn't high five a degenerate conservative like me.
I think he did say one was consensual sex
Long Earth was Pratchett and Stephen Baxter.
Good Omens was Pratchett and Gaiman.
The jokes that were funny in Good Omens were probably written by Pratchett.
The thing feminists need to realise is that the biggest threat to their safety comes from their male allies.
Do keep in mind, innocent until proven guilty.
Apparently there are some pretty damning receipts, both Whatsapp text records and pictures.
Remember, this is a guy who has boasted for years about his open marriage with his wife, and for years people have talked about how he likes to flirt with young women and teenage girls doing his book events. So this is a guy with an established history of depravity to begin with.