Considering "sexual assault" can range from meaning absolutely nothing to "absolutely nothing" any allegation levied towards any self identified male feminist comes off as nothing more than his worth being considered as having run out and now other grifters are looking for their own 15 minutes of fame by being the ones who out him, regardless of what did or didn't happen, and whether it did or didn't happen anyway.
That's certainly one interpretation of it all, yes. His usefulness has run out and so it's another head for the trophy wall.
Of course he saw heads prior to his own going up and thought nothing of it apart from "Believe all women" and kept on in his cavorting carousel unawares that his ride has to come to an end at some point too.
So he's either into shady degrading sexual assault and claiming his victims have memory problems or he's innocent of these claims and will have to wait for the next ones to lap up on shore.
I've no idea as to the truth just now but I know who lit the fuse and it has "Neil Gaiman assisted" written all over it and so I'll just enjoy the fireworks and see who in the audience has decided it's time to leave and find a less 'problematic' place to extol their virtues to hungry nymphs who'll soon seek flesh instead of sublimating stories to sate their satirical succour.
I don't know why, but the alliteration is flowing out of me on this one!
Do not ever give any grace or benefit of the doubt to any leftist no matter the circumstances. They would never extend it to you. Assume that Gaiman is a serial rapist until proven otherwise, and he has the burden of proof to prove his innocence.
Considering "sexual assault" can range from meaning absolutely nothing to "absolutely nothing" any allegation levied towards any self identified male feminist comes off as nothing more than his worth being considered as having run out and now other grifters are looking for their own 15 minutes of fame by being the ones who out him, regardless of what did or didn't happen, and whether it did or didn't happen anyway.
Whether or not he's guilty, this is what he has voted for. Lay down with woke, wake up with sexual assault allegations.
That's certainly one interpretation of it all, yes. His usefulness has run out and so it's another head for the trophy wall.
Of course he saw heads prior to his own going up and thought nothing of it apart from "Believe all women" and kept on in his cavorting carousel unawares that his ride has to come to an end at some point too.
So he's either into shady degrading sexual assault and claiming his victims have memory problems or he's innocent of these claims and will have to wait for the next ones to lap up on shore.
I've no idea as to the truth just now but I know who lit the fuse and it has "Neil Gaiman assisted" written all over it and so I'll just enjoy the fireworks and see who in the audience has decided it's time to leave and find a less 'problematic' place to extol their virtues to hungry nymphs who'll soon seek flesh instead of sublimating stories to sate their satirical succour.
I don't know why, but the alliteration is flowing out of me on this one!
He's rich and famous and people want to cash in on that. That's the reason. That was always the reason.
Then: associating with someone rich and famous in order to get gibs.
Now: throwing someone under the bus who is rich and famous in order to get gibs.
Do not ever give any grace or benefit of the doubt to any leftist no matter the circumstances. They would never extend it to you. Assume that Gaiman is a serial rapist until proven otherwise, and he has the burden of proof to prove his innocence.
And when he has the evidence to prove he didn't do it, don't believe him. He'd do the same.
Until our guys really embrace this kind of stone cold friend/enemy response, things will only get worse.
His work has been shit since he joined Scientology.