"Certain" users here need to stop acting like stereotypes,
(media.scored.co)
Comments (89)
sorted by:
I think this might be more impactful than the pictured graph.
Or you can say "Jewish people overall are more anti-free speech than women in general"
Women are easily influenced by propaganda as well. Who do you think is running the media?
Imagine Jewish women.
Imaging Gal Gadot, Natalie Portman, and Scarlett Johansson
Coom brain activated.
Hey someone asked us to imagine jewish women, so I'm just following the rules
Then a few weeks later she gets the title rescinded after inappropriate sexual activity was involved in her winning.
Bitch looks like plastic too
Though you understand without plastic surgery yentas would look almost as ugly as pajeet women
Abby Shapiro.
Sure but wouldn't we need to see the number of male/female jews surveyed to see if religion or gender is the biggest factor?
Is Woody Allen Jewish?
The old "we would have Republican presidencies every time and a massively right wing government if it weren't for women."
We would have far less degeneracy, no replacement immigration, no bullshit "war on poverty" welfare, etc. if it weren't for women actively ruining the country.
Universal suffrage was implemented to destabilize the country deliberately. The founding fathers knew democracy was shit. It's also used as a cover for obvious corruption, like the constant election manipulation. It's easier to fake votes when you have unrestricted voting.
Repeal the 19th
Yeah... As much as I'd like to draw interesting conclusions from this data, I'd prefer if the entire survey was 100% men.
So womyn are still more based than jews. I mean not that those are orthognonal.
The funny thing is all that diversity wont care about the ----. Only white christians seem to care and the ---- are destroying them and cucking them. Doubt blacks, islam, middle eastern, indians, south americans, asians give a shit about ---- and they see ---- as the same as white people because most ---- are same shade as white people lol.
Remember, Dom is only part of the problem, the faggots who keep reporting comments as 'rule 16 violations' are the other. As annoying as Dom is, he oh so benevolently decrees that calling a nigger a nigger isn't bad if they're behaving like a nigger, so long as you don't say all blacks are niggers, or whatever arbitrary bullshit he uses. Nevertheless, Dom always cites a report whatever you say something mean, so there's those cowardly faggots to contend with.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: This doesn't do that.
An identity attack doesn't apply unless it's actually an attack on an identity group. Attacking an individual would never fall under Rule 16 so long as you didn't generalize the personal attack as an extension of their immutable group.
Case in goddamn point. You ever gonna name and shame the faggots who keep abusing the report system?
No, because for the most part it's not worth it to disincentivize reporting, and it also helps to educate people on how the rules work when there is confusion. Like now.
Counterpoint: that rule is gay, and so are you.
Counter-Counterpoint: I'm a moderator, which makes me a professional faggot. Thus, I can't be not gay.
Lol based Mormons.
Yeah, that was my thought. Are we being accused of being Mormon?
Leftists imagining Mormons right now
My friends in Utah will laugh at that.
No one is asking if your're mormon? The question about how many wives you have came up unconnected to the mormon question
Mormon friend always says, "Have you seen dating life today!? I can barely get a date."
Goddamn mormanons make the Amish look tame.
Isn't free speech rights why we're all here? Did I miss something?
Pedos don't have rights. Maybe they're upset about that.
This works as a pantone color chart to determine who get to be physically removed from America first.
How do you have a "diverse and inclusive" society when people can't speak freely? As speech restrictions increase, all people converge on being the same NPC. Palette swaps aren't diversity.
wow based mormons?
Protestants are more on your side than Catholics?
Now I'm tempted to rub this in the faces of anyone calling us mere "prots".
Unless you combine the 3 protestant categories into one.
What, no Buddhists were polled? Or are we just lumped in with "unaffiliated," which sort of makes sense?
Atheist here at 100% protecting citizens' free speech rights and wondering why the fuck anyone would value inclusion over that.
All the apartheid israel supporters are very fascist and want to stifle free speech everywhere they can.
That's a nice argument, senator. Care to back it up with a source?
It's from a survey by The Knight Foundation. The OP posted an archive to an article about it
Note: user is part of the shill brigade, last post was 20 days ago, only “uses” the donald
(Gfys insurgent)
You realize anyone can click a username and see their posting history, right?
Yes champ, hence me drawing attention to his post history. What part did I get wrong, the odd cross post to KiA months ago with zero follow up comments?
When an account does nothing but post easily digestible rage bait, yeah, they probably aren’t a good faith contributor. But I think he can stand up for himself, assuming I’m wrong, no?
It is always in the interest of warmongering shitbags to stifle free speech so their propaganda is protected against rebuttal or criticism.
You would think, with all their constant blathering about WW II, Jews would be more sympathetic to an open society. This idiotic war (which very well may have been orchestrated by Israel as the Final Solution to the Palestinian Problem) has brought the real scumbags floating to the surface, like that absolutely monstrous speed-freak Benny Shapiro and the nameless assholes voting to bankrupt the US treasury to fund that idiotic tribal shit-show grubbing over sand and rocks and rubble.
Fuck these people.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
This doesn't do that yet.
Thoughts on the hundreds of obvious sockpuppet accounts which have been activated and deployed here over the last week? Especially the ones which call for a total change in leadership while advocated they become the new mod? I’ve seen a lot more of that than lethn-esque retards
Lethn himself is advocating to become a new mod though? LOL
Yes, and in the last week there have been maybe two other accounts like lethn (one being bluestorm and I can’t think of any others). On the other hand, previously dormant accounts suddenly roaring back to life and claiming we need to 1) “remove dom” and 2) appoint mods to “clear out the jidf” have been a dime a dozen. And yes, that’s in addition to the “pedo pajeet” accounts
Well, animus has been building against Dom after bans of a few longterm users. I think ModsAreAids [sp] is somebody's sock. You're right the timing shouldn't be overlooked though.
Hah, no, I mean the guy activating accounts created long before the first time he donned the “pedo pajeet” mask
Dude what are you talking about lol? I recognize ger111, he's not the Indian weirdo.
Also based Prots
Yeah the timing doesn't line up. ger111 had been posting here for months before the pedo shows up. Graphenium on the other hand...
On the other hand what faggot? You can’t be this stupid can you? Prove it
The “Indian weirdo” is but one persona used by this shill, one among hundreds, with thousands of sockpuppets used to vote manipulate or astroturf conversations. And there’s little chance he’s actually indian, unless you think gopower was actually jewish (which are admittedly reasonable enough first assumptions but which don’t stand up under scrutiny).
https://communities.win/c/Meta/p/141Yg8cAra/vote-manipulation-problem/c
That is what happens when DoM bans a user for rule 16 repeatedly. Anyways, Ger111 contributes more than you do here.
Imagine living through the enshitification of ConPro and still being this dense. Then again you think the “age cuck” is actually a random indian as opposed to the known shill with thousands of accounts who was pushing the “age cuck” line literally 2 years before the “pedo pajeet” showed up
Dawww still mad I said your nostalgia-goggles game looked like shit?
Ger111 isn't Insurgent you fucking retard. They type nothing alike, or are you gonna start saying that u/else is insurgent too?
And like I said in the other thread, if Insurgent wants to pretend to be an Indian as well as a pedo, let him. It just gives more reasons to ban him.
You were part of that anyways, with your feud with insurgent over your continuous posting of far east mysticism.
I posted it there 3 times in 2 years you mongoloid, it was him “spamming” it. Fuck you’re thick.
And here’s some of his pedo spam from before his genius idea to don shit-face:
https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/141EwRIPj6/for-all-you-pedo-advocates-who-a/c
Comment Reported for: Rule 11 - Spam
So, ger111 is probably not a brigand. I've had enough enforcement actions to remember his name. This isn't abnormal. Yes, he wants a mod change, it is because he hates me.
Yeah, but, this is what a lot of alt-right accounts do all the time. Even the better ones.
Maybe you need a rule 17 then - what happened to “border enforcement”?
He does still do that even without a rule.
That's why they are getting nuked and IP banned.
Does that even work? The language use of the ones yesterday matches the ones from last week, suggesting it's the same person so any IP bans from then don't seem to have had much effect.
VPN's are real. It's just one of those things.
That'll be why yet another one activated and started posting recently.
https://kotakuinaction2.win/u/wewillkilljim/
Thanks, yeeted.
I could have sworn you did, but I could be misremembering.
Didn’t you call him jidf? Are you saying you don’t hate jidf?
jidf confirmed