Liberalism isn't a cohesive moral framework for living. Christianity was the moral framework for living. Liberalism was an attitude towards that framework.
Now that the moral framework is gone but the liberal attitude remains, it boils down to nothing more then "minimizing harm to others", regardless of any negative societal outcomes.
This is how we got to the redditor "How does this effect you personally??" defense.
Note: I dont think more Christianity is going to save the west, because that is most likely the cause of its fall, imo
You're actually going to have me say I PREFER authoritarian Christians imposing basic morality over society.
I have to less worry about them creating some new STD! If we let you fags continue, we're going to have to look like Quarians just to live with the biological weapons factories you call a 'community'
If only that were possible, but unfortunately all authoritarian power attracts sick fucks, corrupt liars and sociopaths that inevitably infest the system. The solution is more independence and limited but strict law, not handing all power to government.
You don't need to lick a boot to keep predators away from children or have rule of law - the opposite in fact, strong central governments inevitably end up shielding these faggots, you'll find time and time again it's the politicians and other "elites" doing this shit the most.
Because any time a government actually does try to rout corruption, every corrupt government circles the wagons and begins to strangle them to death.
You in fact do need a strong authority to enforce morals and remove those who disobey. If you try to leave it to a "small government" or the public, then the degenerates will team up and gradually overpower them. Normies just want to be comfortable over anything else, and will gladly choose what they think is the "lesser evil" to accomplish that.
Authoritarian is authoritarian. it's like saying since this dictator doesn't behead his citizens for critiquing him. he's better than the other dictator who does. except both dictators punish you for not paying extra for your taxes... so forced taxes +. and jail people for not following absurd laws. but yeah, since one beheads, and the other doesn't. dictatorship is good, you're so right.
And what i'm saying, stupid. is why take either? a christian regime, isn't any better. and let's say the christian regime allows! beheading. than you asshole would still say: "welp, still better than being beheaded in a godless country" fucking idiots.
Unless we're talking about murderers, child fuckers, and rapist. those few, become even fewer... unless this is a race, sexual orientation thing. than i'm more then free to behead you, right? of course out of self-defense.
... Yes, if given the choice, I'm taking the dictator you said doesn't behead (it's funny because everything you said is literally just the USA minus a dictator) vs getting beheaded.
Fucking weirdo. Come up with a better analogy next time.
You don't need to be Christian or even religious at all to not want actual shit eaters in charge of important things or having access to children and the elderly.
Why do these fucks ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS want to be in charge of and/or close to children? Literally fuck off, you're not reproducing by inflicting more trauma on the innocent kids.
Classical liberals shill for Baphomet, news at 11.
Sexual perversion is not to be celebrated. In fact, in this case, Hans needs to go get his flamenwurfer.
--edit--
I didn't read the tweet before I posted, but now I have.
Atheists gotta atheist, it is only a matter of time. Peter cannot reconcile his militant atheism with the knowledge that it was Christianity that produced the finest civilization the world had ever seen, and it was people just like him that destroyed that civilization.
He's getting absolutelyroasted online for that tweet, and deservedly so.
For a supposedly smart guy, he has some remarkable blinders on.
"Classical liberals" were always the most useful of idiots for the Left.
They'll tsk tsk the Left's hedonist ways and disavow them so loudly, but then only actually come out and act when anyone actively tries to stop or prevent them from doing so.
The societies that did not have prohibitions against degenerate shit like shit eating, sodomy, and adultery, died to the diseases and parasites that degeneracy spreads. The major religions that exist, exist because they have traits conducive to spreading and maintaining society.
After watching Destiny and people of his ilk unironically defend incest because "it's not hurting anyone," and "logically it's just two consenting adults," you're damn right I'm in favor of Christian Authoritarianism. Secularists have proven their rules for society end in its degeneration and destruction due to their unfailing, childish want to be completely uninhibited from indulging in any desire. If we need to force you not to fuck your sister and not to eat your own shit, you're making the case for us.
I've come to truly despise so called "one of the good ones" liberals.
They turned a blind eye and ran interference for the radicals as they dismantled society, turned the law of the land on its head, and completely destroyed the moral fabric of what used to be American Civilization TM. They then have the audacity to not only claim they didn't know that this is what would have happened, but then outright deny any responsibility in letting it happen in the first place. When all is said and done, deep down most of them agree with the long term goals of Marxism, only giving a superficial disagreement toward the methods used.
There is no "far Left", there is only THE Left, and their "moderate" comrades can go <fedpost> alongside the peopledemons that perpetrated this.
Unless it becomes possible to arrest and permanently imprison or exile shit eaters, people who aren't immediately revolted by shit eaters, and people who don't think you should remove both of those groups, things will keep getting worse.
I believe in the homosexuality is just parasites theory.
We know parasites can hijack hosts and alter their behavior. Sometimes this involves the host essentially killing itself.
They say mice with Toxoplasma gondii lose their fear of cats. This is suicide for the mouse, but the parasite gets into the cat and the cat shits out more parasite. This is how it spreads itself.
They also say humans can be effected by T. Gondii. Women can become more promiscuous, and men can become less risk adverse (honestly just the same phenomenon in both sexes but men are always more promiscuous, so their lower risk adversion expresses itself in other way).
Why do gays want to bang poopy assholes? Why do they eat poop? Why does it seem like faggotry can be transferred through molestation? When young boys are molested by gays, a common outcome is to become gay themselves and molest other kids, repeating the cycle. Is this free will, trauma, or maybe parasitic influence?
There have been anecdotes about people taking ivermectin and losing their homo desires. This is why it was demonized so harshly imo. The establishment needs their army of mind controlled fags who cant control their lust running around destroying western institutions.
I have no idea who this guy is, but he's an idiot. Some taboos have become obsolete - it's no longer necessary to shun pig meat for fear of parasites, for example - but the one against eating shit remains valid. This politician is a biohazard and a degenerate and the strongest defense he deserves is that shoving him in the incinerator and burning him to sterile ash might be a bit excessive.
Going by the tweet... the person who "ate literal shit" religious affiliations are unknown. and it just seems to be a leftist reactionary, saying the only people who would oppose this are christians. so i have no idea what the comments in KIA2 are even talking about. also down voted and reported for breaking rule... throws dart* 7
Liberalism.
Convincing people its ok to eat something that with every human sensory input says "don't eat me"
That's liberalism in a nutshell
Even animals will shit in a corner of their cage and relocate to the opposite side as best they can.
Chickens will shit in their water, but thats why I steal their children and eat them for breakfast.
except for mice. they will literally shit where they eat.
Just like you!
I assume rodents in general do that. Short digestive track so they eat their shit to absorb all the nutrients.
Liberalism isn't a cohesive moral framework for living. Christianity was the moral framework for living. Liberalism was an attitude towards that framework.
Now that the moral framework is gone but the liberal attitude remains, it boils down to nothing more then "minimizing harm to others", regardless of any negative societal outcomes.
This is how we got to the redditor "How does this effect you personally??" defense.
Note: I dont think more Christianity is going to save the west, because that is most likely the cause of its fall, imo
You're actually going to have me say I PREFER authoritarian Christians imposing basic morality over society.
I have to less worry about them creating some new STD! If we let you fags continue, we're going to have to look like Quarians just to live with the biological weapons factories you call a 'community'
If only that were possible, but unfortunately all authoritarian power attracts sick fucks, corrupt liars and sociopaths that inevitably infest the system. The solution is more independence and limited but strict law, not handing all power to government.
You don't need to lick a boot to keep predators away from children or have rule of law - the opposite in fact, strong central governments inevitably end up shielding these faggots, you'll find time and time again it's the politicians and other "elites" doing this shit the most.
Because any time a government actually does try to rout corruption, every corrupt government circles the wagons and begins to strangle them to death.
You in fact do need a strong authority to enforce morals and remove those who disobey. If you try to leave it to a "small government" or the public, then the degenerates will team up and gradually overpower them. Normies just want to be comfortable over anything else, and will gladly choose what they think is the "lesser evil" to accomplish that.
Authoritarian is authoritarian. it's like saying since this dictator doesn't behead his citizens for critiquing him. he's better than the other dictator who does. except both dictators punish you for not paying extra for your taxes... so forced taxes +. and jail people for not following absurd laws. but yeah, since one beheads, and the other doesn't. dictatorship is good, you're so right.
You do understand that the person you're responding to is saying, given your analogy, "I'd rather be taxed than beheaded," right?
Better analogy for my current reference:
I'd rather have to live by only having sex within marriage than worry about an STD that makes your dick fall off because we gave the fags free reign..
Just trying to keep it as simple as possible, using his own terms, for him to maybe understand.
Yes.
1 problem... ever heard of a condom? also your wife, can have an STD and you don't know it.
That's your argument? Not have moral standards to sexual relationships but 'bruh use a condom'?
or your wife lying to you, and being a whore, and having an std
No, that goon is not capable of following a logical train to the station, from my own experience of trying to explain things to it.
And what i'm saying, stupid. is why take either? a christian regime, isn't any better. and let's say the christian regime allows! beheading. than you asshole would still say: "welp, still better than being beheaded in a godless country" fucking idiots.
Have you tried not deserving a beheading?
I mean this applies to everyone. but sure single me out like an asshole.
No it doesn't apply to everyone. I'm fact in my experience very few people need to work on not deserving being beheaded.
Unless we're talking about murderers, child fuckers, and rapist. those few, become even fewer... unless this is a race, sexual orientation thing. than i'm more then free to behead you, right? of course out of self-defense.
Perverts of most varieties in fact. And you're welcome to try. I've killed better than you and eaten a sandwich afterwards.
Don't eat your shit
... Yes, if given the choice, I'm taking the dictator you said doesn't behead (it's funny because everything you said is literally just the USA minus a dictator) vs getting beheaded.
Fucking weirdo. Come up with a better analogy next time.
Why not either?
You don't need to be Christian or even religious at all to not want actual shit eaters in charge of important things or having access to children and the elderly.
Dude was literally in charge of youth, children and families in his town's council.
Because of course he was
Why do these fucks ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS want to be in charge of and/or close to children? Literally fuck off, you're not reproducing by inflicting more trauma on the innocent kids.
Classical liberals shill for Baphomet, news at 11.
Sexual perversion is not to be celebrated. In fact, in this case, Hans needs to go get his flamenwurfer.
--edit--
I didn't read the tweet before I posted, but now I have.
Atheists gotta atheist, it is only a matter of time. Peter cannot reconcile his militant atheism with the knowledge that it was Christianity that produced the finest civilization the world had ever seen, and it was people just like him that destroyed that civilization.
He's getting absolutely roasted online for that tweet, and deservedly so.
For a supposedly smart guy, he has some remarkable blinders on.
Der schwere flamenwerfer
The only true and righteous thing any anarcho-Communist has ever said is that liberals rightly get the bullet, too.
Some ideas are so stupid only a highly "educated" academic would vouch for them.
The tweet boils down to "Look at me I'm so thoughtful and tolerant!"
People should fear being judged as shit eating child molesters. Fear shows the systems of incentives and consequences are working.
I think it is a good stigma to have, yes.
Tolerance is a sin.
"Classical liberals" were always the most useful of idiots for the Left.
They'll tsk tsk the Left's hedonist ways and disavow them so loudly, but then only actually come out and act when anyone actively tries to stop or prevent them from doing so.
Most of the rights big influencers are self described "classical liberals". Its pathetic.
Probably because those in power know they won't accomplish shit. If they were actually some form of right wing, they wouldn't be allowed on any media.
Its like Fox News, they only can exist by being toothless.
The societies that did not have prohibitions against degenerate shit like shit eating, sodomy, and adultery, died to the diseases and parasites that degeneracy spreads. The major religions that exist, exist because they have traits conducive to spreading and maintaining society.
Natural selection applies to EVERYTHING.
Normal people regardless of religion don't eat their own shit.
Or anyone else's for that matter.
After watching Destiny and people of his ilk unironically defend incest because "it's not hurting anyone," and "logically it's just two consenting adults," you're damn right I'm in favor of Christian Authoritarianism. Secularists have proven their rules for society end in its degeneration and destruction due to their unfailing, childish want to be completely uninhibited from indulging in any desire. If we need to force you not to fuck your sister and not to eat your own shit, you're making the case for us.
It's sure going to hurt the inevitable offspring, and not in a fixable way.
Depends on how close the relation is.
there was a stigma against these people for a reason.
the fence was necessary.
I've come to truly despise so called "one of the good ones" liberals.
They turned a blind eye and ran interference for the radicals as they dismantled society, turned the law of the land on its head, and completely destroyed the moral fabric of what used to be American Civilization TM. They then have the audacity to not only claim they didn't know that this is what would have happened, but then outright deny any responsibility in letting it happen in the first place. When all is said and done, deep down most of them agree with the long term goals of Marxism, only giving a superficial disagreement toward the methods used.
There is no "far Left", there is only THE Left, and their "moderate" comrades can go <fedpost> alongside the
peopledemons that perpetrated this.You can't be liberal if you don't think criticism is acceptable.
shuffles deck
The West really is mimicking the fall of Rome, coprophiliacs and all. Truly vile.
Unless it becomes possible to arrest and permanently imprison or exile shit eaters, people who aren't immediately revolted by shit eaters, and people who don't think you should remove both of those groups, things will keep getting worse.
I believe in the homosexuality is just parasites theory.
We know parasites can hijack hosts and alter their behavior. Sometimes this involves the host essentially killing itself.
They say mice with Toxoplasma gondii lose their fear of cats. This is suicide for the mouse, but the parasite gets into the cat and the cat shits out more parasite. This is how it spreads itself.
They also say humans can be effected by T. Gondii. Women can become more promiscuous, and men can become less risk adverse (honestly just the same phenomenon in both sexes but men are always more promiscuous, so their lower risk adversion expresses itself in other way).
Why do gays want to bang poopy assholes? Why do they eat poop? Why does it seem like faggotry can be transferred through molestation? When young boys are molested by gays, a common outcome is to become gay themselves and molest other kids, repeating the cycle. Is this free will, trauma, or maybe parasitic influence?
There have been anecdotes about people taking ivermectin and losing their homo desires. This is why it was demonized so harshly imo. The establishment needs their army of mind controlled fags who cant control their lust running around destroying western institutions.
I have no idea who this guy is, but he's an idiot. Some taboos have become obsolete - it's no longer necessary to shun pig meat for fear of parasites, for example - but the one against eating shit remains valid. This politician is a biohazard and a degenerate and the strongest defense he deserves is that shoving him in the incinerator and burning him to sterile ash might be a bit excessive.
I will not eat the shit, I will not live in the hole.
I'm sure that one african politician is feeling pretty vindicated after years of being the subject of mockery for saying gays "eat the poo poo".
Can they do it with a shit eating grin?
Yes. Experiment successful.
Going by the tweet... the person who "ate literal shit" religious affiliations are unknown. and it just seems to be a leftist reactionary, saying the only people who would oppose this are christians. so i have no idea what the comments in KIA2 are even talking about. also down voted and reported for breaking rule... throws dart* 7
Oops! Looks like you missed.
oops