Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

60
This triggered quite a few people (media.kotakuinaction2.win)
posted 2 years ago by evilplushie 2 years ago by evilplushie +60 / -0
54 comments download share
54 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (54)
sorted by:
▲ 42 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 42 points 2 years ago +42 / -0

As I've said many times, I agree with Sean Connery

A lot of women don't understand the ideas of consequences and retaliation and so act like they'll never be on the receiving end. If one well timed slap stops this and causes them not to be entitled idiots, better that than they push too far and suffer REAL consequences..

permalink save report block reply
▲ 29 ▼
– evilplushie [S] 29 points 2 years ago +29 / -0

I mean I think some people need to get hit, male and females, as a form of discipline and to tell them to knock it off. This can range from a slap to a full on beatdown depending on the severity of their actions

People who think otherwise are either deluded pacifists or white knights

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 28 ▼
– Adamrises 28 points 2 years ago +28 / -0

Hitting women is like hitting children.

If you ever use your full strength you are out of line, short of them actively in the process of committing serious harm on someone. Otherwise, the fear of the hit and the built anticipation will always do more work than the actual hit needs to but the knowledge you will follow through needs to be there.

I think anyone who was raised right knows that the fear of the belt did more work to curb their behaviors than anything, and right now no woman fears any belt (metaphorically, don't belt adults that's just a fetish).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 27 ▼
– MrGiggles 27 points 2 years ago +27 / -0

If the belt works, it needs to be used very sparingly. It needs to be known as the line you NEVER cross, otherwise the use of physical punishment loses its meaning.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 26 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 26 points 2 years ago +26 / -0

Males are more prone to getting hit it's why we're usually more restrained and learn risk assessment a lot early on.

The problem we have is because of 'oppression Olympics' and giving minorities essentially the leeway of early feminists, you have not provided that fear of consequence to minority men which is EXTREMELY dangerous and results in these animalistic attacks whether as a group or just randomly attacking people.

We see some women using this to attack ALL men like they're all as violent but we can see the amount of times they hide race in assault reporting to know that's bullshit.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– AgilePickle1123 21 points 2 years ago +21 / -0

I think unironically Mike Tyson has one of my favorite quotes regarding exactly that.

"Social media made y'all way too comfortable with disrespecting people and not getting punched in the face for it."

Soyboys and trannies wouldn’t exist in the olden days because they would’ve got the shit beat out of them for saying stupid shit or trying to groom kids.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– FromTheShadows 21 points 2 years ago +21 / -0

Sounds like a modern-day revamp of an old Conan the Barbarian quote: “Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing.”

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– Arkana 12 points 2 years ago +12 / -0

Islam still teaches this to some extent. Obviously this guy is dressing it up quite a bit though. It's a shame that most men in the west have lost the ability to properly show force in a restrained and controlling way.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Assassin47 14 points 2 years ago +14 / -0

Nayef is obviously a boy, but let's imagine that he is the wife.

Was this filmed in Afghanistan?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Rartin 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

It sounds like Arabic! Afghanistan speaks the same language as Iran, Farsi(Dari) and they have 3 extra syllables in their language. Arabic sounds like monkeys making guttural sounds emanating from the throat

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Not just 'to some extent'. The Koran literally says that it's OK to beat your wife.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Graphenium 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0

What does the talmud say about 3 year old girls?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Do tell.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Graphenium 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

https://www.sefaria.org/search?q=“3%20years%20old”&tab=text&tvar=1&tsort=relevance&svar=1&ssort=relevance

A female less than 3 years old, her intercourse is not considered as intercourse, and her virginity returns.

Weird thing to sneak into your holy book no?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

I'm impressed that you actually produced a source. Normally when people try to attack the Talmud, they just cite some website that collects quotes they think are damaging to Jews.

You actually linked to a Jewish site.

But I think you misunderstand the nature of the Talmuds.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Graphenium 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

But I think you misunderstand

So explain that verse to me, why are they worried about the virginity of 3 year olds?

I'm impressed that you

Yeah I’ve learned how to preemptively avoid many of the pilpulous pitfalls parlayed against the truth

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 28 ▼
– ernsithe 28 points 2 years ago +28 / -0

"HOW DARE YOU ADVOCATE VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN!" - t. retards on Twitter whose timelines are half posts fantasizing about hitting JK Rowling

permalink save report block reply
▲ 22 ▼
– AgilePickle1123 22 points 2 years ago +22 / -0

*killing JK Rowling. Let’s not kid around here, I’ve seen some abhorrent shit posted by troons and leftist commies that genuinely churned my stomach. All because she fucking donated money. Wild

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– TheStupidPrizeWinner 14 points 2 years ago +14 / -0

The only thing worse than a heretic is an apostate. If they let Rowling continue without punishment, then the other sheeple might get their own thoughts or ideas about the ideology. Best use fear to keep the flock in line.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– MLGS 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

One of the worst things you can do to communists is be somebody they liked growing up and then slightly disagree with them on a single issue.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 10 ▼
– alucard13mmfmj 10 points 2 years ago +10 / -0

"protect all women" unless the woman says something mean about trannies. then the lefties will wish rape and murder on that woman.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 25 ▼
– Adamrises 25 points 2 years ago +25 / -0

A coal burner like herself would have to agree with that, else she'd never be able to find a man again.

This is just a "pick-me" woman grifting hard off saying literally every single hard anti-feminist talking point possible, from body count attacks, to lowering the age of consent, to "its the woman's fault if he cheats."

Which is all fine and some of them completely correct, except she is a known ultra-rich slut who openly admitted to buying her way to social media prominence and then simping for whatever controversial man was popular at the time for clicks.

A "based" or "right-wing" woman's opinion, even if correct, should always be met with telling her that if she held those principles she'd not even be talking.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 23 ▼
– Vicious_snek6 23 points 2 years ago +23 / -0

pick-me

Leftist crab bucket language.

I don't disagree in her particular case. But this is just lefty language used against any woman who dares drift even slightly rightwards.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Adamrises 14 points 2 years ago +14 / -0

Yes, that's why its in quotation marks. Its still fitting in this case because she is literally adopting new talking points and politics in the moment whenever its beneficial to get a dude's attention.

Its why she wrote an anti-Jew song to hope that Nick Fuentes would notice her, senpai. And why she says things like the above to hope you don't notice her first BF was a homeless nigger who left her for being a cheating whore with an absurd body count.

Also, women never drift "slightly rightwards." If you know her politics and aren't in her family, she isn't a right wing woman, she is a grifter trying to get attention. So its completely fitting to call her a Lefty insult for an attention whore, because by opening her mouth she proves it fitting and that she still drinks from the Left's ill gotten gains of feminism.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Bouldabassed 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

Is it even a leftist insult? I hear it far more often used in right leaning circles to describe male feminists. If the shoe fits...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Adamrises 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

Its a woman's insult for other women. It usually does get used to describe "right-leaning" women because they are completely empty of any personality trait other than desperately trying to pander to men.

So its Leftist because women are mostly Leftist and "right wing women" are some of the most vapid creatures that they get special insults made for them.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– Justalurker69420 18 points 2 years ago +18 / -0

Anyone who thinks some women do not deserve to get hit have zero experience with women.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– Kaarous 13 points 2 years ago +13 / -0

Completely correct. Authority is derived from violence. Men have that power, stemming from God Himself, and His granted role of men as leaders of the household.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– The_Shadow_of_Intent 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

This is just a really volatile topic... I agree with the bare content of the post. As you go back far enough in cinema history, you'll see women getting slapped, by men, Sean Connery or otherwise, and a lot of the time they deserve it. However, the notion that it's OK to hit a woman sometimes is incredibly easy to misinterpret and misapply. Most domestic violence is unrestrained frustration and anger, so it's safer just to make up your mind to never hit a woman and leave it at that.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 14 points 2 years ago +14 / -0

pretty sure most domestic violence is women hitting men

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

I tend to agree with Sean Connery, but if you give people a license to hit others, they'll use it when they (wrongly) think that they are in the right - as you say.

There are other cases where it is clear-cut. It's always legitimate to hit a woman in self-defense or in retaliation for physical violence.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– evilplushie [S] 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

I mean it doesnt even need to be hit by a man. Women hit each other fairly often. Slaps count

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– The_Shadow_of_Intent 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

True but we all know that the discourse on hitting women is exclusively about men's actions

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– evilplushie [S] 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

It's only controversial if men hit women.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– The_Shadow_of_Intent 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

Yeah, that's what I mean.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– realerfunction 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

HOW CAN SHE SLAP

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– evilplushie [S] 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

https://twitter.com/pearlythingz/status/1779201969468412358?t=mIoUTC-6w5i92MSmRkH9Ng&s=19

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– GoldenInnosStatue 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Whoa, Based?!?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– NeonPiratePeteR 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Men who follow this broad are like feminists but vice versa. Its as close to being gay as you can be without touching peen or wearing crocs

permalink save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy