This triggered quite a few people
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (54)
sorted by:
So explain that verse to me, why are they worried about the virginity of 3 year olds?
Yeah I’ve learned how to preemptively avoid many of the pilpulous pitfalls parlayed against the truth
I might as well explain electro-weak theory to you. If you want it explained, you could consult someone who knows what he's talking about, who has made his life studying the Talmud.
Why are they worried? Purity religions are worried about a lot of weird things. Here, it might be retaining the girl as marriagable though.
How would you know it's "the truth" if you copy-pasted it from a site that has an ax to grind, which does not provide a source?
Many excellent infographics or whatever you want to call them on the subject exist, sourced and everything, but there’s no winning with some of you people, and even if every quote is cited and an unambiguous translation of writing included in the talmud, you’ll be accused of gishgallop - and on the other hand, if even one of two dozen quotes comes from, say, a kabbalistic text (thus not the talmud, a good example being the Toledat Yeshu), the image will be accused of conflation and dismissed out of hand by the usual suspects.
So that’s why I go to the source, and following from that the translation the mainstream jews themselves agree upon.
So to bring us back, tell me, why do you take such severe issue with one “purity religion” and not the other? When the jews work out just how old their rape victims can be to still be of mariable quality, you squeak out “buh buh im no expert, but I’m sure it’s justified!”, yet when the Muslims say “women should behave in X, Y, and Z fashion” you raise a bitch fit and act like we should send goyim, I mean “our sons and daughters” to fight them in some kind of clash of civilizations. Am I reading you wrong?
This is the very first time that an even mildly dubious text from the Talmud has been sourced by someone. Normally, it's just copy-paste for people who look for a club with which to beat people they don't like.
And if I understand it correctly, and I'm not a Jew let alone one spending 18 hours a day at the Yeshiva as some here believe, the Talmud is nothing more than a collection of the words of famous Jewish 'theologians'. As if you were to gather all the famous medieval Christian theologians who commented on Lombard's book. Now, some of them no doubt said something batty. It doesn't follow from that at all that this is 'the Jewish view'.
Well yeah, if you claim the Talmud says something and it's a Kabbalistic text, they're right to dismiss that.
If I purported to quote Augustine and produce as evidence something from Quesnel's devotional or some text of mysticism, you'd call me a retard, and rightly so.
One has 1.5 billion followers, is exterminating all religious minorities as well as freethinkers in its midst, is threatening to overtake all of Europe, and the other is a pitiful sect taking no or barely any converts whose adherents go from one catastrophe to the other.
If Muslims kept to themselves, had only 15 million people, took no converts, and better yet, were effing off to a country they created, I'd love them.
Just posing an alternative interpretation to "the Jews just want to rape 2-year-olds", which seems pretty strange to me.
I'd do it if it did any good. But it doesn't, as the past two decades have taught us.
Right now, it's the 'Chosen People' fighting Islam and the Muslims. So "the goyim" are sending the Jews to do their dirty work for them. You should love them.
Lmfao, dude, don’t be so disingenuous:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disputation_of_Paris
That was what? 800 or so years of cited sources of “even mildly dubious text from the talmud”? On the one hand you’ll claim “most oppressed people of all time!” But you never seem to want to discuss any potential causes for their situation beyond “goyim bad”.
Wrong, it is the holy book of Rabbinic judaism. Like hadiths if every muslim agreed on them. Nothing like “early church fathers” (tangentially, many of whom had based opinions on that matter, but that’s neither here nor there).
Well it seems they were trying to until a few people with funny sounding last names took over in a violent terroristic campaign of violence, murder, and genocide. You might have heard of it? Palest-something? Palaski? Palawitz? Palestine? Something like that.
Shit dude did you miss that whole Epstein raping kids for the mossad thing? Amazing how selective you are with your memory. Because jews have never EVER been associated with child murder and mutilation. Nope never, totally invented out of whole cloth in 2016.
Lmfao the naievity is astounding. I bet you would have supported the austere religious scholar Bin Laden in his holy religious crusade against communism, had you existed as anything more than a sample of jizzum at the time. You seem far too easily swayed by the ramblings of ((intellectuals)).