This triggered quite a few people
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (54)
sorted by:
This is the very first time that an even mildly dubious text from the Talmud has been sourced by someone. Normally, it's just copy-paste for people who look for a club with which to beat people they don't like.
And if I understand it correctly, and I'm not a Jew let alone one spending 18 hours a day at the Yeshiva as some here believe, the Talmud is nothing more than a collection of the words of famous Jewish 'theologians'. As if you were to gather all the famous medieval Christian theologians who commented on Lombard's book. Now, some of them no doubt said something batty. It doesn't follow from that at all that this is 'the Jewish view'.
Well yeah, if you claim the Talmud says something and it's a Kabbalistic text, they're right to dismiss that.
If I purported to quote Augustine and produce as evidence something from Quesnel's devotional or some text of mysticism, you'd call me a retard, and rightly so.
One has 1.5 billion followers, is exterminating all religious minorities as well as freethinkers in its midst, is threatening to overtake all of Europe, and the other is a pitiful sect taking no or barely any converts whose adherents go from one catastrophe to the other.
If Muslims kept to themselves, had only 15 million people, took no converts, and better yet, were effing off to a country they created, I'd love them.
Just posing an alternative interpretation to "the Jews just want to rape 2-year-olds", which seems pretty strange to me.
I'd do it if it did any good. But it doesn't, as the past two decades have taught us.
Right now, it's the 'Chosen People' fighting Islam and the Muslims. So "the goyim" are sending the Jews to do their dirty work for them. You should love them.
Lmfao, dude, don’t be so disingenuous:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disputation_of_Paris
That was what? 800 or so years of cited sources of “even mildly dubious text from the talmud”? On the one hand you’ll claim “most oppressed people of all time!” But you never seem to want to discuss any potential causes for their situation beyond “goyim bad”.
Wrong, it is the holy book of Rabbinic judaism. Like hadiths if every muslim agreed on them. Nothing like “early church fathers” (tangentially, many of whom had based opinions on that matter, but that’s neither here nor there).
Well it seems they were trying to until a few people with funny sounding last names took over in a violent terroristic campaign of violence, murder, and genocide. You might have heard of it? Palest-something? Palaski? Palawitz? Palestine? Something like that.
Shit dude did you miss that whole Epstein raping kids for the mossad thing? Amazing how selective you are with your memory. Because jews have never EVER been associated with child murder and mutilation. Nope never, totally invented out of whole cloth in 2016.
Lmfao the naievity is astounding. I bet you would have supported the austere religious scholar Bin Laden in his holy religious crusade against communism, had you existed as anything more than a sample of jizzum at the time. You seem far too easily swayed by the ramblings of ((intellectuals)).
Dude, talking about Internet Stormfags. Don't pretend that they know anything of history.
And where did I say that? There are plenty of causes. Middlemen minorities are hated everywhere, as Sowell has demonstrated.
The Old Testament is the holy book of Rabbinic Judaism. Not sure why you're comparing it to the hadiths. The church fathers provided guidance on how to interpret the Bible, just like the Talmudists did for the Old Testament.
Actually, zero of them would have said that Jews are bad on account of their race or lineage. They just said that their religion is wrong, which is perfectly legitimate. They were far too close to the time when nearly all Christians were ethnic Jews to condemn an entire people based on their race. Hell, that disputation you cited, as well as Tortosa, was conducted by a converted Jew.
Muslims were trying to eff off back to their own countries? Could have fooled me.
This in defense of the idea that "the Jews want to rape 2-year-old kids"? All I have to do is present one white pedo and you'll say this proves that whites want to rape 2-year-old kids? Be serious.
"Intellectuals" generally back Islam...
Except you (used to?) call me a sToRmFaG for presenting the same historical arguments. I think you’re being a little too broad when you just assume that everyone who feels this way is an unthinking racist. They may since have descended into unthinking racism on the subject, but I would wager many if not most got to that point through applied logic initially, saw that the subject was not ((allowed)) to be discussed logically, and decided “well if they don’t why should I” - or something along those lines. I mean, you even do it here. You’re dancing around the validity of everything I raise while still decrying the imagined (though not necessarily imaginary) sToRmFaG.
So you’re victim blaming? Yikes. Do better sweaty.
Wrong. They don’t follow “the OT”, they follow the talmud. That’s the definition of rabbinic judaism.
Yeah no shit, who else could expose evil from within but for someone within already. Are you ((again)) trying to insinuate that I’m looking at this solely through a racial lens? You’d be a fool to. You should look up Ron Unz of the Unz Report, Henry Makow, Norman Finkelstein, Glenn Greenwald, among others for some modern day jews with integrity. Sounds like you could do with some exposure to thoughts outside your comfort zone.
If you found one who was running his operation on behalf of a White intelligence agency for the purpose of collecting blackmail on influential non-whites*
Seriously stop playing so fucking dumb on this subject. “Blood Libel” “vampires” “Saint Simon of Trent”. Literally thousands of years of accusations of satanic ritual child abuse.
Inb4 “mUh mean goyim were mean to them for no reason!!!!! Whites are gross too!!!!!”
Fack off with that gay shit
Yeah I think they’re calling themselves “jews for palestine” these days?
I called you a Stormfag for very different reasons, perhaps things that you just said because you thought it would rile me up.
This sounds logical, but I wouldn't be sure on the percentages. It doesn't help that nearly everyone who, say, talks about the USS Liberty tends to a rabid Jew-hater. At the same time, I've seen people wonder about the Holocaust: they lie about everything else, so why would that be true. Besides, they try to silence everyone who argues otherwise, and that's how a guilty mind acts.
If all I know about a given topic was that "the regime is trying to censor side X", I'd say that side X was probably in the right.
Leaving satire aside, almost everything has a reason or a cause. It doesn't mean that it is sufficient justification for the reaction.
Do you mean that they don't follow the Old Testament at all? That is certainly wrong. You might argue that the Talmud has equal standing with the OT, because I recall it being called the 'oral law' as opposed to the 'written law' of the OT - but the other claim would be preposterous.
Right, but that doesn't work if you were to argue - which it seems you don't - that Jews are inherently evil by virtue of their ethnicity, rather than their religion being no good.
That's good, but it is a legitimate assumption because it holds for 99% of people here who don't like the Jews.
I watch Greenwald's show almost every day. I agree he has integrity. I just disagree with him on Israel.
That would implicate non-whites more than whites.
By Jews? Less than a thousand, actually. I believe 1144 was the first one. And of course, none of them are in any way credible. The only way you could rightly accuse Jews of child abuse is what they do to their own children.