This is how it starts. It's not just the nose, but the fact that they want to blur the line between Japanese and Non-Japanese to help normalize open border policies.
Regardless of the rest of it... I've seen cosplayers that are hotter in the wild, after spending half the day sweating in the scorching sun. I don't get the Miss [location] judging qualities.
So your latest tact is that it doesn’t matter if a Jew clearly and stereotypically subverted another cultural institution because it was inevitable/typical? What even is this logic? You’re getting lazy.
Do you really think you're fooling anyone here, when you obfuscate like this? This kind of playing dumb is "leftoid/commie concern troll 101" and it is painfully obvious for anyone who's aware of it.
And when actually presented that information from OP, that's the moment I said this:
That is a fair complaint. Japan should never embrace multiculturalism because it doesn't work and is damaging to any society that adopts it. If there's a reason she should be deported, it's for values like that. That shows she's not trying to integrate.
For the most part, his primary line of complaint is that integration is physically impossible, which is silly.
Well it's a fine line isn't it? Japan can't consider genetically different people to be fully and completely Japanese, otherwise that would lead to their replacement. It seems kind of harsh but that is the reality.
Sounds pretty fine to me. Not impossible, but delicate. If the immigrant considers themselves as interchangeable in all cases with the natives, then the next question is, "why should I be a racial minority?"
Why would that be a legitimate question if they are properly integrated?
Normally, "integration" was almost directly understood as: intermarriage. After 3 generations of intermarrying into the majority group, you wouldn't even identify as the minority group.
If, on the other hand, they are still within their group (which suggests you weren't going slowly and you have created a colony), and they are integrated into the society, there is no reason to fear being a minority.
If the minority is merely recognized as a present minority in the country with no real concern about them one way or another; then there is no issue. I have yet to hear anyone complain about the number of Finns in their country, regardless of country. Nobody seems to really care. This is because either integrate with their neighbors or don't form colonies. But if a minority were to emerge and properly integrate; it would be recognized as simply a local curiosity. "Over here, you will see a small finish community. They have good fish!"
Now, we are left with the possibility of minorities in the country that won't integrate. This could be a problem, but only if they do not adopt a "model minority" tradition. Very few people complain about the presence of Amish beyond their buggies being slow. They are separatist to a significant degree, but they do not seek war, nor conflict, and often deal fairly with others. The overseas Germans, Japanese, and Chinese were also regarded in similar manners.
The danger of the model minority is that they might be too successful. You don't need a domestic population getting resentful of a successful minority otherwise you could create serious ethnic tension. Such as what has occasionally happened with the Chinese, Japanese, the Boer, and Jews. The Amish, physically can't outpace the domestic population by virtue of their religion, protecting them from popular reprisals; but the others could be a problem. This is why you want to keep immigration low. Low enough to the point that those populations do not colonize in the first place, and integrate with the society at large.
The only exception to this is in Civic Nationalism, where you basically forcibly integrate them into your civic value structure. This, in and of itself, is a big way of pushing back on most migration if you maintain it. The immigrants have to voluntarily arrive, and then voluntarily abandon their old ways to assimilate. Refusal is depuration. Nothing else can be tolerated.
Multi-culturalism doesn't work because it is staunch segregation. It can't work. You are either all in, or you are all out.
Normally, "integration" was almost directly understood as: intermarriage. After 3 generations of intermarrying into the majority group, you wouldn't even identify as the minority group.
OK I agree, but that's not what we're talking about here.
If, on the other hand, they are still within their group (which suggests you weren't going slowly and you have created a colony), and they are integrated into the society, there is no reason to fear being a minority.
If the minority is merely recognized as a present minority in the country with no real concern about them one way or another; then there is no issue. I have yet to hear anyone complain about the number of Finns in their country, regardless of country. Nobody seems to really care.
I would agree in theory. But in practice, the ethnic narcissism of certain groups, fanned by Jewish interests, insists on the privilege to import more and more of them - and who are the genetic natives to disagree because that would mean that a native is somehow more of a citizen than racial minorities?
Also there is the justification that the genetic natives are not really legitimate because they themselves displaced a native people, which can easily be applied to Japan via the Ainu. In practice, the immigration debate is a slippery slope toward this argument.
You really do just wander around taking huge Ls in order to protect the tribe. This is about as clear a case as shapeshifting and subversion as I can imagine, and you’re response is “I see nothing wrong here”.
No matter how many times you call me a jew, it doesn't change the fact that Exodus didn't happen and god of Abraham doesn't exist.
As far as I can see, this is a Leftist trying to push multi-culturalism. That is what is wrong with that, but it took several comments for OP to even bring it up, when his primary complaint is that integration doesn't real.
So in other words, you DO have ethnic jewish ancestry, even though you’re an atheist.
I really, really never wanted to do all this noticing. 2010 me would be horrified at the things I’ve come to believe, but the evidence is just shoved in my face over and over again.
I didn't see much that stood out until he posted that she specifically said that Japanese people need to accept her as Japanese for multi-culturalism. That's why I said that I didn't see anything particularly egregious. And yeah, I didn't look into it much because I read a portion of what OP presented and that was about it.
Is this a big thing on twitter or something?
I have no intention of calling you a weeb.
I said "Tell it to Japanese Immigration law" because I can't do anything about Japan, and neither can OP, because none of us are Japanese as far as I can tell.
What are the odds the US ambassador Rahm Emanuel pushed for this? Hell, what are the odds those two are related? Looks close enough.
You will never be Japanese.
This is how it starts. It's not just the nose, but the fact that they want to blur the line between Japanese and Non-Japanese to help normalize open border policies.
Japan is for the Japanese
Regardless of the rest of it... I've seen cosplayers that are hotter in the wild, after spending half the day sweating in the scorching sun. I don't get the Miss [location] judging qualities.
What's going on with her weird stick bug arms?
Lack of protein and vitamins/minerals while in the womb and in the first years of life. The Standard American Diet at work.
All fluff rewards show are worthless. Yes, all of them. VGA, Eurovision, Miss <location> every single one.
Time to kick them out
This reminds me of when I lived in Hawaii. I was from Hawaii, not Hawaiian. In the same way Ncuti Gatwa is from Scotland, but not Scottish.
She passes none of these tests and I'm sure she nose how full of shit she is.
I'm sure the actual people of Japan are thrilled with this outcome.
So if she had children, for what hot blooded man could resist such a woman, would her children be Japanese or Jewish? Or both? Jewpanese? Japish?
Fellow Japanese.
Her daughter should be named sosumi
First generation immigrant is attempting to integrate.
Good?
I mean, if your complaint is that Ms. Japan should not be a 1st gen immigrant, okay; but that doesn't seem like your hyperventilating argument.
We don't want more randos integrating. Go home.
That's not my problem. Tell it to Japan's immigration laws.
I said your emphasis on someone being a foreigner and winning a contest is silly. Your stupidity is the problem.
Look at her. A beauty contest. An ugly foreign blood won top beauty of native peoples. DEI won here.
Beauty contests are normally retarded. It's like being surprised a racist rant won at a debate tournament.
So your latest tact is that it doesn’t matter if a Jew clearly and stereotypically subverted another cultural institution because it was inevitable/typical? What even is this logic? You’re getting lazy.
What institution are you talking about? Ms. Japan is an institution?
Lmao
Do you really think you're fooling anyone here, when you obfuscate like this? This kind of playing dumb is "leftoid/commie concern troll 101" and it is painfully obvious for anyone who's aware of it.
There's too many replies so I'm not sure what your complaint is in reference to.
This isnt even a beauty contest. If it was, a beauty would have won. This is a goblin dolled up to its best.
Why are we complaining about this retarded contest at all, then?
She's doing the opposite of integrating. From her own mouth, she's trying to change Japan.
And when actually presented that information from OP, that's the moment I said this:
For the most part, his primary line of complaint is that integration is physically impossible, which is silly.
Well it's a fine line isn't it? Japan can't consider genetically different people to be fully and completely Japanese, otherwise that would lead to their replacement. It seems kind of harsh but that is the reality.
That's not a fine line, you just need to accept that immigrants may need 3 generations to fully integrate, and must be kept as the minority.
That does start with the immigrant trying to recognize themselves as that thing (even if they are not).
Sounds pretty fine to me. Not impossible, but delicate. If the immigrant considers themselves as interchangeable in all cases with the natives, then the next question is, "why should I be a racial minority?"
Why would that be a legitimate question if they are properly integrated?
Normally, "integration" was almost directly understood as: intermarriage. After 3 generations of intermarrying into the majority group, you wouldn't even identify as the minority group.
If, on the other hand, they are still within their group (which suggests you weren't going slowly and you have created a colony), and they are integrated into the society, there is no reason to fear being a minority.
If the minority is merely recognized as a present minority in the country with no real concern about them one way or another; then there is no issue. I have yet to hear anyone complain about the number of Finns in their country, regardless of country. Nobody seems to really care. This is because either integrate with their neighbors or don't form colonies. But if a minority were to emerge and properly integrate; it would be recognized as simply a local curiosity. "Over here, you will see a small finish community. They have good fish!"
Now, we are left with the possibility of minorities in the country that won't integrate. This could be a problem, but only if they do not adopt a "model minority" tradition. Very few people complain about the presence of Amish beyond their buggies being slow. They are separatist to a significant degree, but they do not seek war, nor conflict, and often deal fairly with others. The overseas Germans, Japanese, and Chinese were also regarded in similar manners.
The danger of the model minority is that they might be too successful. You don't need a domestic population getting resentful of a successful minority otherwise you could create serious ethnic tension. Such as what has occasionally happened with the Chinese, Japanese, the Boer, and Jews. The Amish, physically can't outpace the domestic population by virtue of their religion, protecting them from popular reprisals; but the others could be a problem. This is why you want to keep immigration low. Low enough to the point that those populations do not colonize in the first place, and integrate with the society at large.
The only exception to this is in Civic Nationalism, where you basically forcibly integrate them into your civic value structure. This, in and of itself, is a big way of pushing back on most migration if you maintain it. The immigrants have to voluntarily arrive, and then voluntarily abandon their old ways to assimilate. Refusal is depuration. Nothing else can be tolerated.
Multi-culturalism doesn't work because it is staunch segregation. It can't work. You are either all in, or you are all out.
OK I agree, but that's not what we're talking about here.
I would agree in theory. But in practice, the ethnic narcissism of certain groups, fanned by Jewish interests, insists on the privilege to import more and more of them - and who are the genetic natives to disagree because that would mean that a native is somehow more of a citizen than racial minorities?
Also there is the justification that the genetic natives are not really legitimate because they themselves displaced a native people, which can easily be applied to Japan via the Ainu. In practice, the immigration debate is a slippery slope toward this argument.
You really do just wander around taking huge Ls in order to protect the tribe. This is about as clear a case as shapeshifting and subversion as I can imagine, and you’re response is “I see nothing wrong here”.
No matter how many times you call me a jew, it doesn't change the fact that Exodus didn't happen and god of Abraham doesn't exist.
As far as I can see, this is a Leftist trying to push multi-culturalism. That is what is wrong with that, but it took several comments for OP to even bring it up, when his primary complaint is that integration doesn't real.
So in other words, you DO have ethnic jewish ancestry, even though you’re an atheist. I really, really never wanted to do all this noticing. 2010 me would be horrified at the things I’ve come to believe, but the evidence is just shoved in my face over and over again.
Gradually...
I thought it was one day for no reason at all...
Gradually... Was his experience arguing with them
One crowd says one thing, the other says the other.
Dude, I'm not a jew, I don't know why you are so obsessed with insisting that I am one.
Here: "Israel has no right to exist."
Can I go now?
Post foreskin. Jk
We both know the response would be: "this isn't your foreskin shapeshifter"
I didn't see much that stood out until he posted that she specifically said that Japanese people need to accept her as Japanese for multi-culturalism. That's why I said that I didn't see anything particularly egregious. And yeah, I didn't look into it much because I read a portion of what OP presented and that was about it.
Is this a big thing on twitter or something?
I have no intention of calling you a weeb.
I said "Tell it to Japanese Immigration law" because I can't do anything about Japan, and neither can OP, because none of us are Japanese as far as I can tell.
Yikes that nose
Also was she the one gaining traction online saying based stuff or was that someone else? Can't remember
The Nose Knows
> she
Post Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Post Approved: This actually doesn't do this.
yep. jewish when its convenient. white when convenient lol.