There are networks of groomers who smuggle sex change hormones to children online and teach them dubious recipes for producing sex change hormones at home, yes. It's too insane to make up.
The troon REEEing is actually correct this time that KF is responsible for getting the bathtub HRT peddlers deplatformed.
It's not even a direct assault on these degenerates. They are simply the lowest hanging fruit in a campaign to get Cogent to uniformly enforce their own ToS as ISP Internet Jannies.
Cogent has started nullrouting KF access requests from customers using unrelated ISPs but have to cross Cogent infrastructure at some point.
This makes access to KF for any user whose ISP includes Cogent in their downstream Tier 1 mix very unreliable to access independent of any concurrent DDos attacks or any domain/site specific hosting issues. Cogent is effectively stealing and blackholing requests for KF access that comes from users who aren't even their customers, by pretending KF's domain doesn't exist and causing an error if the shortest path available crosses on to Cogent infrastructure.
In response, Null decided on a campaign of malicious compliance to get more attention to KF's plight and Cogent's unprecedented jannying shenanigans.
The idea is to have individuals file Acceptable Use Policy reports regarding any Cogent customers they suspect aren't in compliance with their AUP and ToS, similar to how Liz Fong-Jones has been so successful in filing reports to get KF dropped.
It's not specifically against the DIY HRT sites, but these are the easiest targets since they are engaging in illegal activity out in the open.
The overarching goals are a little more amorphous.
The first is to try to get Cogent to start applying their new Internet jannying tactics more uniformly by enforcing their AUP against other sites rather than just KF. The hope is that this will create more awareness and more targets speaking out against Tier 1 ISPs acting as the Internet Police.
The second is to waste Cogent customer service resources and make them reconsider the implications of being jannies.
The third is that Cogent has a little-known policy that they bill 20$ to THE CUSTOMER for every successfully processed AUP complaint. So even legitimate complaints without enforcement action in theory have a financial cost to illegal and immoral sites they host.
Lastly, there's a separate campaign encouraging users of KF who are affected by Cogent's nullrouting downstream to contact their own local ISP to complain they are being denied access to a US legal website, as is their right. The hope being that their local ISPs will investigate the matter and possibly diversify their Tier 1 blend, potentially impacting Cogent's business.
Great summary. I find it loathsome, but the enemies of Kiwi Farms (namely Elliot Liz Fong Jones) found a strategy that got some traction--goes after the low level networks. It is awful, antithetical to a free and open Internet, and it should be exposed for the totalitarian tactic it is.
In the meanwhile, apply it against the same people people who came up with the strategy. Fuck them.
I mean, how they can unironically say: "they are preventing us of giving children homebrow hrt" and think not only that they are the good guys but that society at large isn't instantly revolted by them.
Oh wow, that opening salvo of a broad suggestion that Null gave in a recent video was no mere jest.
For context, all he was essentially proposing was that people simply "help" the various regulatory/censorship companies along a little by reporting on all the various websites that were clearly violating some kind of rules or another.
If it just happens to overload these entire systems with massive numbers of complaints and fines, and piss a lot of other people off, well that's just a little "unfortunate".
WTF?
People are buying "homebrew" hormones? Are they retarded?
Wonder what they thought of Ivermectin, lol
Have you heard of troonshine? It's where you boil plastic bags in water, leach the xenoestrogens out, and drink the resulting soup.
I was hoping that that was just a "one person did" type of thing.
You'd be better off ordering hormones from Silk Road than doing that.
There are networks of groomers who smuggle sex change hormones to children online and teach them dubious recipes for producing sex change hormones at home, yes. It's too insane to make up.
This is literally why KF was attacked in the first place. Keffals was black-marketing this shit to kids and KF found out about it.
The troon REEEing is actually correct this time that KF is responsible for getting the bathtub HRT peddlers deplatformed.
It's not even a direct assault on these degenerates. They are simply the lowest hanging fruit in a campaign to get Cogent to uniformly enforce their own ToS as ISP Internet Jannies.
Cogent has started nullrouting KF access requests from customers using unrelated ISPs but have to cross Cogent infrastructure at some point.
This makes access to KF for any user whose ISP includes Cogent in their downstream Tier 1 mix very unreliable to access independent of any concurrent DDos attacks or any domain/site specific hosting issues. Cogent is effectively stealing and blackholing requests for KF access that comes from users who aren't even their customers, by pretending KF's domain doesn't exist and causing an error if the shortest path available crosses on to Cogent infrastructure.
In response, Null decided on a campaign of malicious compliance to get more attention to KF's plight and Cogent's unprecedented jannying shenanigans.
The idea is to have individuals file Acceptable Use Policy reports regarding any Cogent customers they suspect aren't in compliance with their AUP and ToS, similar to how Liz Fong-Jones has been so successful in filing reports to get KF dropped.
It's not specifically against the DIY HRT sites, but these are the easiest targets since they are engaging in illegal activity out in the open.
The overarching goals are a little more amorphous.
The first is to try to get Cogent to start applying their new Internet jannying tactics more uniformly by enforcing their AUP against other sites rather than just KF. The hope is that this will create more awareness and more targets speaking out against Tier 1 ISPs acting as the Internet Police.
The second is to waste Cogent customer service resources and make them reconsider the implications of being jannies.
The third is that Cogent has a little-known policy that they bill 20$ to THE CUSTOMER for every successfully processed AUP complaint. So even legitimate complaints without enforcement action in theory have a financial cost to illegal and immoral sites they host.
Lastly, there's a separate campaign encouraging users of KF who are affected by Cogent's nullrouting downstream to contact their own local ISP to complain they are being denied access to a US legal website, as is their right. The hope being that their local ISPs will investigate the matter and possibly diversify their Tier 1 blend, potentially impacting Cogent's business.
Great summary. I find it loathsome, but the enemies of Kiwi Farms (namely Elliot Liz Fong Jones) found a strategy that got some traction--goes after the low level networks. It is awful, antithetical to a free and open Internet, and it should be exposed for the totalitarian tactic it is.
In the meanwhile, apply it against the same people people who came up with the strategy. Fuck them.
Who is the
pedotransgender that demanded his child grooming be censored and started all this?Keffals
TRANNY FART PORN
I mean, how they can unironically say: "they are preventing us of giving children homebrow hrt" and think not only that they are the good guys but that society at large isn't instantly revolted by them.
So it’s a false fag attack?
No. Null called for it on the 19th after Cogent started blackholing a bunch of IPs.
Total Retard War by sending complaints to their abuse staff to demand they apply their ToS universally.
Awesome, it’ll annoy them if nothing else.
It's not
Bro it's a straight kiwi campaign.
We're hitting back after the Cogent bullshit, or really just making them own up to what they claim they're responsible for.
They want to be the internet police, force them to commit.
... so, certain parties are upset that their payment providers have declined association with an unlicensed, unregulated mail-order pharmacy?
Colour me shocked that they didn't want to be up on "conspiracy" charges...
literally genocide
"Hey Kids!!!"
"Bonerrrrrrrrrrrr...."
"Bonerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr............"
What comic is that? Been wanting to find that.
This one : https://sinfest.xyz/view.php?date=2023-06-13
Anonymous delivers!!!
I'm pretty sure it was Sinfest.
I don't have it saved, sorry.
Request in ConPro. They'll have it.
Based if true.
If this actually works we should absolutely throw their shit back at them.
Unlike normal people, communists understand that "lol fuck off faggot" is a perfectly acceptable defense against any text-based attack.
a used tactic is a usable tactic
Oh wow, that opening salvo of a broad suggestion that Null gave in a recent video was no mere jest.
For context, all he was essentially proposing was that people simply "help" the various regulatory/censorship companies along a little by reporting on all the various websites that were clearly violating some kind of rules or another.
If it just happens to overload these entire systems with massive numbers of complaints and fines, and piss a lot of other people off, well that's just a little "unfortunate".
“How To Feel Better About The State Of Your Own Life: The Manual”
How does the radical Left claim to support net neutrality but support ISP blocks of Kiwi Farms at the same time?