The part that I hate about this vide is that the only reason she gets away with this is because there are men behind her. Female cops would go away fast if we left them on their own.
the only reason she gets away with this is because there are men behind her
You just described every single action taken by women as individuals and as a group in history.
They don't have any real power, because real power comes from the ability to inflict violence. All of their so called empowerment comes from the very men they despise so dearly. Some of them are cognizant of this, most probably try not to think of it too hard, but all of them use it.
There are so many problems that could be solved if men would just wake up to this reality. Unfortunately, most men are led around by their dicks, and thus we are eternally doomed by simps to repeat this cycle of suffering.
"Something given has no value. When you vote, you are exercising political authority, you're using force. And force my friends is violence. The supreme authority from which all other authorities are derived.”
The simp population in the west is definitely the problem, you see it in male politicians and it all goes back to it. Boris Johnson got into shit over covid because he couldn't tell his wife no and I'm not exaggerating that. It was because of her he threw the parties at number 10 in the first place because she wanted social gatherings, should have told her to shut up. Male politicians want to be seen as the good guys so they frequently do the bidding of cross party feminists that have infiltrated the ranks of government.
Woman slaps the shit out of a man, he slaps her back. A handful of men literally rush him and start beating him down while screaming that he is a bastard, as he screams in confusion and pain about why was she allowed to hit him at all.
Unfortunately, most men are led around by their dicks, and thus we are eternally doomed by simps to repeat this cycle of suffering.
It's worse than that. Most men are not only led around by their dicks, but they actively advocate for being led around by their dicks even more. How many posts in this forum are about:
"Oh no, they made this female character less attractive" (i.e. I can't wank to my fantasies about a video game character any more, the horror!)
"Oh no, someone is making pornography less accessible" (i.e. It will be harder to find material that overstimulates my sex drive and makes me more of a slave to sex, the horror!)
Until men learn to stop being slaves to their passions, and reject media that helps enslave them, women and feminists (i.e. most women) will continue leading men around by their dicks.
You are right, but your conclusions for your examples are wrong.
I don't even play the games where these women have been uglified, but I can understand and I support the outrage. Why? Because as I've mentioned a few times before, it's not just about the uglification of the women, it's the intent.
But, again, you are right that way too many men are led around by the knob (it's how the human race sustains its existence). The problem is when men are unwilling to forfeit those urges to do the right thing; to tear down disruptive institutions, or to abandon irrational civic policies.
It's how we end up with people being arrested for posting "mean" things online, or calling some wench a "lesbian" (even if it's true), or laws that protect the delusions of those who deny basic reality.
It's also frustrating seeing a lot of men defend elements of wokeness that adhere to their own fetishes. That's one of the major reasons why faggotry keeps spreading. You have a lot of knobheads who will enable it because "lesbians are hot guys!".
I had a few encounters over the last several years where some coomers unironically said, "I'm fine with them making the LGBT content canon because it's already like that in the porn I watch". I had no response because what else is there to say?
This issue has extended from entertainment media all the way into politics. And as others have mentioned throughout this thread, a lot of it could have been prevented if men thought with their right head and simply said, "No!".
The point I'm making is there are far bigger things to worry about that "uglification of women" in media. Yet that is what many men care about enough to make a big fuss over. Why? Because they are so brainwashed to think that sex is the most important thing in life, that they will fight tooth and nail to access sex in some form. Men need to devote their time to actual standing up for what actually matters in society - actual morality - not a quick fix like a junkie.
The point I'm making is there are far bigger things to worry about that "uglification of women" in media.
Media is as important as politics, because media affects culture, and culture affects politics.
Do you know why there are so many people who accept Leftist agitprop? Because it's pushed heavily across all of their consumable media. If you accept it in media, you accept it in politics.
Men need to devote their time to actual standing up for what actually matters in society - actual morality - not a quick fix like a junkie.
I agree, to an extent, but you need to combat it on all fronts, not just at the polls. Because that's exactly how the polls are affected -- just like the overt promotion of abortion across media, television, literature, and advertising has convinced people it's good, so they vote for politicians who support abortion... why? Because media told them so.
Even the normies are complaining about how bad films and entertainment are and this is why I'm partly looking forward to how bad 2024 is going to be because they are going to get really naked about beating women with the ugly stick and pushing a political agenda. It's amazing how there are still idiots who don't get the game being played by the left, no wonder we've made zero progress since 2016.
Either the whole point of that post went over your head or you're intentionally acting obtuse so nobody can debate you on the facts. (i.e. If I just expel verbal diarrhea instead of making a concrete argument they can't refute it!) (this is how your game works, right?)
? My comment stands on it's own. I don't give a shit about some lame Reddit thread that you linked to; my comment was a general statement based on obvious observations that any fool could make by themselves (yes, I am a fool, no doubt).
Although, the fact that you care shows how easily you are manipulated "OMG! Some wanker on Reddit said something stupid! I must adopt the opposite position because my idea of right and and wrong is: Leftist on reddit = wrong; opposite of leftist on reddit = right."
In contrast to you, I will stand by my positions when I am basing them on my morality regardless of whether some idiot on Reddit happens to have the same opinion or not.
It's tiny woman syndrome, look at her for fuck's sake LOL. I remember ages ago there was a Joe Rogan podcast where he was discussing this sort of thing about how dangerous it is that women have been tricked into thinking they can do this sort of shit. Lots of women grow up thinking they can pick fights like this and it is a fucking dangerous mentality.
I don't know about you guys but when it comes to men even I had the upbringing of, never pick fights you don't think you can win but that's luckily due to me picking up proper martial arts lessons at an early age. These women all think they're a Mary Sue character and she's obviously got that mentality on steroids.
Reminds me of that video with the little woman going off on some dude at a bar, not realizing he was a Russian tourist who dgaf about European chivalry and put her on the floor.
Some people refuse to acknowledge that men and women are different - mentally, physically, and the social experience they receive growing up.
Every man - barring the extreme outliers - is going to receive a physical education growing up, whether they want it or no. And part of this is understanding how to hold back, how to exercise restraint, how to go in a sliding scale of response from 0 to 100. They have to. Alot of men deal with fragile hot-house flowers on a daily basis they could do extreme damage to if they went all out on(ie, women) and learn very quickly to dial things up and down as necessary.
Women never receive that. They never have to. They live in blissful ignorance, lulled by propaganda, thinking they're a badass bitch and believing 100 on the dial response is what they need to do, all the time, every time.
So you get shit like this. Unrestrained violence without any repercussion, because she's inculcated the knowledge that she can do anything she wants and no one's going to stop her.
There is a solid reason why it used to be socially acceptable to backhand a woman if she got out of line.
(As an aside, this also applies to social interaction, as well, and why it's so difficult for women to emulate how good male friends can shit-talk amongst one another without causing offense. Unrestrained, women go for the throat, all the time, every time, and react with confusion when men react negatively toward this, because they think that's what men are doing without understanding any of the learned nuance.)
Tiny dogs aren't viewed as a threat so when it gets shitty the owners never discipline it. Jump 6 months/a few years later and you have a dog that was never told to STFU that never STFU.
The UK authorities and establishment are a joke ACROSS the board, not to go too much off a tangent, was watching a breakdown of the HS2 rail line project and it's such a colossal failure compared to just Europe that the money it costs to just get through planning permission....was enough to build the longest road tunnel in Europe.
The UK would be better going back under feudalism with dukes and barons at this stage, where lesbian nana over here would have to fend for herself so I'd give her a week before her Karen act gets her chucked off a cliff.
It was three seperate governments, the Labour government, the coalition (Conservative and Liberal Democrats) then the Conservatives. All of them failed to properly budget, manage costs especially given that the proposed line would go through or near the estates wealthy Conservative donors owned.
Depends, if they show up to my door then start dancing and stripping in my living room because they're a stripper, I'm happy for them to be in uniform...for a short while so long as not 'lesbian nana' levels of attractiveness /s
The reason why this woman was allowed to do this is because the average resident of her town disapproves, says something like "right bit of a scuffle, eh?" and gets on with their life, where they should really be on a megaphone campaigning to replace the PD like all the budding UK jihadists do with Israel. I bet this is the case even with the people she pepper sprayed.
Normies have this quality where they think it's cringe or beneath them to care too much about governance/political issues, no matter how black and white wrong they are. In conservatives, this is often disguised as "well I have a job and a family so I can't protest like jobless antifa" as their kid is groomed on the internet and transitioned at school. Sometimes I want to slap their stupid fat heads.
Reminder that the active wing of the IRA never really had more than 250 people at any one time, yet that 250 kept tens of thousands busy all day, every day.
The part that I hate about this vide is that the only reason she gets away with this is because there are men behind her. Female cops would go away fast if we left them on their own.
You just described every single action taken by women as individuals and as a group in history.
They don't have any real power, because real power comes from the ability to inflict violence. All of their so called empowerment comes from the very men they despise so dearly. Some of them are cognizant of this, most probably try not to think of it too hard, but all of them use it.
There are so many problems that could be solved if men would just wake up to this reality. Unfortunately, most men are led around by their dicks, and thus we are eternally doomed by simps to repeat this cycle of suffering.
"Something given has no value. When you vote, you are exercising political authority, you're using force. And force my friends is violence. The supreme authority from which all other authorities are derived.”
"what is the moral difference, if any, between a civilian and a citizen?"
The simp population in the west is definitely the problem, you see it in male politicians and it all goes back to it. Boris Johnson got into shit over covid because he couldn't tell his wife no and I'm not exaggerating that. It was because of her he threw the parties at number 10 in the first place because she wanted social gatherings, should have told her to shut up. Male politicians want to be seen as the good guys so they frequently do the bidding of cross party feminists that have infiltrated the ranks of government.
Laws forcing us to be simps is the problem.
Ah, but who voted for those laws in the first place?
Jewish controlled politicians.
Its like the famous "How can she slap!?" video.
Woman slaps the shit out of a man, he slaps her back. A handful of men literally rush him and start beating him down while screaming that he is a bastard, as he screams in confusion and pain about why was she allowed to hit him at all.
It's beyond the realm of common men, it's a government issue at this point.
It's worse than that. Most men are not only led around by their dicks, but they actively advocate for being led around by their dicks even more. How many posts in this forum are about:
"Oh no, they made this female character less attractive" (i.e. I can't wank to my fantasies about a video game character any more, the horror!)
"Oh no, someone is making pornography less accessible" (i.e. It will be harder to find material that overstimulates my sex drive and makes me more of a slave to sex, the horror!)
Until men learn to stop being slaves to their passions, and reject media that helps enslave them, women and feminists (i.e. most women) will continue leading men around by their dicks.
You are right, but your conclusions for your examples are wrong.
I don't even play the games where these women have been uglified, but I can understand and I support the outrage. Why? Because as I've mentioned a few times before, it's not just about the uglification of the women, it's the intent.
But, again, you are right that way too many men are led around by the knob (it's how the human race sustains its existence). The problem is when men are unwilling to forfeit those urges to do the right thing; to tear down disruptive institutions, or to abandon irrational civic policies.
It's how we end up with people being arrested for posting "mean" things online, or calling some wench a "lesbian" (even if it's true), or laws that protect the delusions of those who deny basic reality.
It's also frustrating seeing a lot of men defend elements of wokeness that adhere to their own fetishes. That's one of the major reasons why faggotry keeps spreading. You have a lot of knobheads who will enable it because "lesbians are hot guys!".
I had a few encounters over the last several years where some coomers unironically said, "I'm fine with them making the LGBT content canon because it's already like that in the porn I watch". I had no response because what else is there to say?
This issue has extended from entertainment media all the way into politics. And as others have mentioned throughout this thread, a lot of it could have been prevented if men thought with their right head and simply said, "No!".
The point I'm making is there are far bigger things to worry about that "uglification of women" in media. Yet that is what many men care about enough to make a big fuss over. Why? Because they are so brainwashed to think that sex is the most important thing in life, that they will fight tooth and nail to access sex in some form. Men need to devote their time to actual standing up for what actually matters in society - actual morality - not a quick fix like a junkie.
Media is as important as politics, because media affects culture, and culture affects politics.
Do you know why there are so many people who accept Leftist agitprop? Because it's pushed heavily across all of their consumable media. If you accept it in media, you accept it in politics.
I agree, to an extent, but you need to combat it on all fronts, not just at the polls. Because that's exactly how the polls are affected -- just like the overt promotion of abortion across media, television, literature, and advertising has convinced people it's good, so they vote for politicians who support abortion... why? Because media told them so.
Even the normies are complaining about how bad films and entertainment are and this is why I'm partly looking forward to how bad 2024 is going to be because they are going to get really naked about beating women with the ugly stick and pushing a political agenda. It's amazing how there are still idiots who don't get the game being played by the left, no wonder we've made zero progress since 2016.
You're absolutely right about that....
There is a breaking point affecting normies. But the big question is, what will they do about it?
Oh my god it took less than 24 fucking hours for someone to pick up the idiot ball.
Either the whole point of that post went over your head or you're intentionally acting obtuse so nobody can debate you on the facts. (i.e. If I just expel verbal diarrhea instead of making a concrete argument they can't refute it!) (this is how your game works, right?)
Eat a bag.
? My comment stands on it's own. I don't give a shit about some lame Reddit thread that you linked to; my comment was a general statement based on obvious observations that any fool could make by themselves (yes, I am a fool, no doubt).
Although, the fact that you care shows how easily you are manipulated "OMG! Some wanker on Reddit said something stupid! I must adopt the opposite position because my idea of right and and wrong is: Leftist on reddit = wrong; opposite of leftist on reddit = right."
In contrast to you, I will stand by my positions when I am basing them on my morality regardless of whether some idiot on Reddit happens to have the same opinion or not.
It's tiny woman syndrome, look at her for fuck's sake LOL. I remember ages ago there was a Joe Rogan podcast where he was discussing this sort of thing about how dangerous it is that women have been tricked into thinking they can do this sort of shit. Lots of women grow up thinking they can pick fights like this and it is a fucking dangerous mentality.
I don't know about you guys but when it comes to men even I had the upbringing of, never pick fights you don't think you can win but that's luckily due to me picking up proper martial arts lessons at an early age. These women all think they're a Mary Sue character and she's obviously got that mentality on steroids.
Reminds me of that video with the little woman going off on some dude at a bar, not realizing he was a Russian tourist who dgaf about European chivalry and put her on the floor.
It is truly the only language they understand, in the end.
All their immigrants would make sure of it.
just like the prehistorical days, the invading men from the other villages don't give a shit about your village elder nana
I don't know what I have less confidence in if the system stops working: Two female cops together or two female pilots together.
Some people refuse to acknowledge that men and women are different - mentally, physically, and the social experience they receive growing up.
Every man - barring the extreme outliers - is going to receive a physical education growing up, whether they want it or no. And part of this is understanding how to hold back, how to exercise restraint, how to go in a sliding scale of response from 0 to 100. They have to. Alot of men deal with fragile hot-house flowers on a daily basis they could do extreme damage to if they went all out on(ie, women) and learn very quickly to dial things up and down as necessary.
Women never receive that. They never have to. They live in blissful ignorance, lulled by propaganda, thinking they're a badass bitch and believing 100 on the dial response is what they need to do, all the time, every time.
So you get shit like this. Unrestrained violence without any repercussion, because she's inculcated the knowledge that she can do anything she wants and no one's going to stop her.
There is a solid reason why it used to be socially acceptable to backhand a woman if she got out of line.
(As an aside, this also applies to social interaction, as well, and why it's so difficult for women to emulate how good male friends can shit-talk amongst one another without causing offense. Unrestrained, women go for the throat, all the time, every time, and react with confusion when men react negatively toward this, because they think that's what men are doing without understanding any of the learned nuance.)
Women have the same problems with finance. They were never taught it in school and never learned the responsibility of keeping a budget.
I can assure the same goes for the majority of female "leaders" in the military.
I suppose it's the same situation with tiny dogs being so aggressive and loud (probably because they feel threatened all the time like this lady)
Tiny dogs aren't viewed as a threat so when it gets shitty the owners never discipline it. Jump 6 months/a few years later and you have a dog that was never told to STFU that never STFU.
Which is why she'll probably be the next chief of police.
The UK authorities and establishment are a joke ACROSS the board, not to go too much off a tangent, was watching a breakdown of the HS2 rail line project and it's such a colossal failure compared to just Europe that the money it costs to just get through planning permission....was enough to build the longest road tunnel in Europe.
The UK would be better going back under feudalism with dukes and barons at this stage, where lesbian nana over here would have to fend for herself so I'd give her a week before her Karen act gets her chucked off a cliff.
Doesn’t the current UK government have a massively majority and the ability to push through any law changes it wants to?
How come they failed to get the rail project approved (by their own government)
It was three seperate governments, the Labour government, the coalition (Conservative and Liberal Democrats) then the Conservatives. All of them failed to properly budget, manage costs especially given that the proposed line would go through or near the estates wealthy Conservative donors owned.
Anyone who thinks women should be cops (or firefighters) has lost touch with reality.
Or firemen, don't use their words.
Depends, if they show up to my door then start dancing and stripping in my living room because they're a stripper, I'm happy for them to be in uniform...for a short while so long as not 'lesbian nana' levels of attractiveness /s
What was the context for this? I heard it was because they arrested someone and the community came out in anger. Which is odd for White people.
The reason why this woman was allowed to do this is because the average resident of her town disapproves, says something like "right bit of a scuffle, eh?" and gets on with their life, where they should really be on a megaphone campaigning to replace the PD like all the budding UK jihadists do with Israel. I bet this is the case even with the people she pepper sprayed.
Normies have this quality where they think it's cringe or beneath them to care too much about governance/political issues, no matter how black and white wrong they are. In conservatives, this is often disguised as "well I have a job and a family so I can't protest like jobless antifa" as their kid is groomed on the internet and transitioned at school. Sometimes I want to slap their stupid fat heads.
Protesting doesn't do anything except identify yourself so your life can be ruined. Only fear of death can make people change their minds.
Reminder that the active wing of the IRA never really had more than 250 people at any one time, yet that 250 kept tens of thousands busy all day, every day.
That was done with institutional support and was before modern mass surveillance. Besides that